Bill of Rights
Treaty Of Versailles
Explain answer please
Thanks
Answer:
Fourteen Points
Explanation:
Support for a voting reform proposal, such as the implementation of ranked-choice voting (RCV), is grounded on its potential to promote democratic values, ensure diverse political representation, and improve campaign civility, despite opposition concerns over complexity and voter confusion.
Supporting a proposal requires a clear understanding of the issue at hand, a strong position, and the ability to address opposition with reasoning and evidence. Taking the example of a voting reform proposal, we might argue for the implementation of ranked-choice voting (RCV). This system allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference, which can promote a more democratic and representative outcome.
One reason to support RCV is that it can reduce the prevalence of negative campaigning, as candidates must appeal not only to their base but also to the second and third preferences of their opponents' supporters. Another reason is the elimination of the 'spoiler effect', where a third-party candidate can change the outcome of an election between two major parties. This encourages a more diverse field of candidates and political perspectives. As for constitutional principles, RCV aligns with the fundamental values of American constitutional democracy by refining the electoral process to better reflect the will of the people.
Opponents may argue that RCV is complex and could cause voter confusion. However, evidence from jurisdictions that have implemented RCV shows that with proper voter education, people understand and adapt to the system. Moreover, the potential benefits, such as higher voter satisfaction and more civil campaigns, outweigh the initial challenges of transition.
In conclusion, supporting RCV is justified by its alignment with democratic values, encouragement of diverse political representation, and ability to improve the civility of electoral campaigns.
#SPJ12
what is your proposel?
Mensheviks
Bolsheviks
republicans
A negative effect of the 1933 National Industry Revovery Act was: employees spying on employers.
The National Industry Recovery Act (NIRA) was passed during the Great Depression as a way to try to get American businesses back onto solid footing. But it was an overreach. It did give employees the right to collective bargaining with employers -- but that was a good thing. The bad thing was how the NIRA pushed and sometimes forced industries to operate in government-sanctioned alliances or cartels. (This was similar to actions that had been taken in Mussolini's fascist Italy.) Antitrust laws were suspended in this process. In effect, this meant the government was encouraging industries to set fixed prices, wages, and production levels. Much of this was enforced by the National Recovery Administration (NRA), created by an executive order from President Roosevelt following the passage of the NIRA. The Blue Eagle symbol was used as the emblem of the NRA. Businesses were to have a Blue Eagle sign in their windows saying, “We Do Our Part.” That was meant to show that each business adhered to the set price and production codes. Citizen committees then engaged in spying on local businesses and report them to authorities if they violated pricing agreements by trying to sell at lower than the set prices.
A Supreme Court case in 1935, A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, ultimately decided that the provisions of the NIRA and the actions of the NRA were unconstitutional.
B. These groups were considered weak and inferior by many male factory owners, allowing them to unionize without appearing threatening.
C. These groups generally worked in industries without large trusts, weakening management and allowing them to organize more easily.
D. These groups were considered especially vulnerable by many Americans, allowing them to become the public faces of early unions.
The use of women, children and immigrant allowed industrialists and factory owners to keep wages low for native born men. This was an important catalyst for the organization of labor unions, Children often worked long hours for low pay. The same was true of women and immigrants.