b. a type of brainstorming
c. writing that provides details that explain, restate, illustrate, or expand on the topic
d. part of the writing process that involves creating a first draft
Elaboration means writing that provides details that explain, restate, illustrate, or expand on the topic.
Elaboration is defined as to add details to something which enhances the writing and gives a wider idea. An example of elaborate is to add more details to a story. It is a process of selecting and integrating details that support, explain, illustrate, and/or develop ideas. Regardless of whether these ideas come from source materials or from experience, full, relevant elaboration enhances writing material. For example, to learn the pair “cow-ball” a person could form a visual image of a cow kicking a ball.
Therefore, (C) option is the correct answer.
To learn more about Elaboration, refer here :
#SPJ2
B. The noun or pronoun that follows it
C.The noun or pronoun that comes just before it.
Answer:
C.The noun or pronoun that comes just before it.
Explanation:
The term apposition is part of the terminology proper to grammar, more specifically it is one of the elements of the subject of a sentence. The apposition is a noun that aims to identify the noun or pronoun that is close to it.
For example, read the following sentence:
I was fine, until Luan, my ex boyfriend, phoned me again.
In that phrase, the expression "my ex boyfriend" is an apposition that is identifying what is the noun "Luan".
1. to convince readers that practices that destroy coral reefs must be stopped 3.to inform readers about how the coral reefs are being destroyed
The article does both of these things. First the reader is informed about how the coral reefs are being destroyed. This helps the reader understand and know what is happening with the coral reefs and also why their destruction is so terrible. This in turn helps to convince the reader that practices that destroy the coral reefs must be stopped. By organizing the article in this way, the reader comes to his/her own conclusion that these practices could and should be changed.
Answer:
A) and C)
Explanation:
Got this question right on Edge. Thank you MrsTate!
argumentum ad hominem
slippery slope fallacy
bandwagon
endorsement
either-or fallacy
Answer:
c? im guessing thats the answer the other person gave
Explanation:
The rest area near the hikers appeared in the distance after hiking for hours.
After hiking for hours, the hikers saw the rest area appear in the near distance.
The hikers near the rest area appeared in the distance after hiking for hours.
After hiking for hours, in the near distance the hikers appeared at the rest area
The correct answer is B. After hiking for hours, the hikers saw the rest area appear in the near distance.
Explanation:
The original sentence or "After hiking for hours the rest area appeared in the near distance" aims at explaining some hikers had been hiking for hours and then they could see the rest area in the near distance; however, this meaning is not completely clear because in the original sentence it is not explicitly stated who was the person or entity that hiked for hours and then saw the rest area instead it is stated the rest area appeared which creates a confusing sentence.
Considering this, the best revision for this sentence would be to state it the entity or agent of the action and change the word "appear", therefore, the best revision is "After hiking for hours, the hikers saw the rest area appear in the near distance" as this explicitly states the "hikers" were the ones that hiked for hours and then they saw the rest are, which corrects the mistakes of the original sentence.