Under the _______ Amendment, you have the right to know the charges brought against you and to question witnesses who bring evidence against you.a. First
b. Sixth
c. Fifth
d. Second

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:     Under the sixth amendment, you have the right to know the charges brought against you and to question witnesses who bring evidence against you. Hope this helped :)

Related Questions

How could you use the purposes when you write things yourself? (50 POINTS)
Is the sentence simple, compound, or complex? Since the guests arrived yesterday, the family has sat together for all meals.
Some realist fiction discusses relevant social issues. What important social issue does Kate Chopin's "The Story of an Hour" primarily focus on?
Which statement best describes the Sapphic stanza?A Sapphic stanza consists of three lines in which each line has two fewer syllables than the previous one.A Sapphic stanza consists of four lines with alternating lengths of 10 syllables and 14 syllables.A Sapphic stanza consists of three lines of iambic pentameter followed by a line with 11 syllables.A Sapphic stanza consists of four lines where the first three have 11 syllables and the fourth has five.
how the media covers different events and occurrence ;spaces allocated for advertisements and why certain topics are given prominence over others

Which of the following describes elaboration?a. a type of writing in which one argues for or against a point
b. a type of brainstorming
c. writing that provides details that explain, restate, illustrate, or expand on the topic
d. part of the writing process that involves creating a first draft

Answers

Elaboration means writing that provides details that explain, restate, illustrate, or expand on the topic.

Explain Elaboration with examples?

Elaboration is defined as to add details to something which enhances the writing and gives a wider idea. An example of elaborate is to add more details to a story. It is a process of selecting and integrating details that support, explain, illustrate, and/or develop ideas. Regardless of whether these ideas come from source materials or from experience, full, relevant elaboration enhances writing material. For example, to learn the pair “cow-ball” a person could form a visual image of a cow kicking a ball.

Therefore, (C) option is the correct answer.

To learn more about Elaboration, refer here :

brainly.com/question/2881453

#SPJ2

i think C is the most accurate choose to define elaboration

An appositive explains or identifies _____.A. The Verb
B. The noun or pronoun that follows it
C.The noun or pronoun that comes just before it.

Answers

Answer:

C.The noun or pronoun that comes just before it.

Explanation:

The term apposition is part of the terminology proper to grammar, more specifically it is one of the elements of the subject of a sentence. The apposition is a noun that aims to identify the noun or pronoun that is close to it.

For example, read the following sentence:

I was fine, until Luan, my ex boyfriend, phoned me again.

In that phrase, the expression "my ex boyfriend" is an apposition that is identifying what is the noun "Luan".

I think the answer should be B.

What is the author’s purpose in "Save the Coral Reefs”? Check all that apply. 1. to convince readers that practices that destroy coral reefs must be stopped 2.to entertain readers with a dramatic tale about the destruction of coral reefs 3.to inform readers about how the coral reefs are being destroyed 4.to inform readers about which fishing companies damage the coral reefs the most 5.to persuade readers to try scuba diving before the coral reefs are destroyed

Answers

1. to convince readers that practices that destroy coral reefs must be stopped 3.to inform readers about how the coral reefs are being destroyed

The article does both of these things. First the reader is informed about how the coral reefs are being destroyed. This helps the reader understand and know what is happening with the coral reefs and also why their destruction is so terrible. This in turn helps to convince the reader that practices that destroy the coral reefs must be stopped. By organizing the article in this way, the reader comes to his/her own conclusion that these practices could and should be changed.

Answer:

A) and C)

Explanation:

Got this question right on Edge. Thank you MrsTate!

Identify the logical fallacy.Bringing a team to our city is risky. They're either going to blow it and get booed out of town, or they'll win the Series and expect the city to fork over the cash for a new stadium. Taxpayers are losers either way.
argumentum ad hominem
slippery slope fallacy
bandwagon
endorsement
either-or fallacy

Answers

either-or fallacy. note the word "either" and "or" being placed before each argument. giving an ultimatum.

Your science teacher assigns you to complete a presentation on DNA with a group of fellow students. The project requires writing, drawing, presenting, and creating a model. Your group understands its goal, what should your group focus on now?

Answers

discover group member skills and assign roles

Answer:

c? im guessing thats the answer the other person gave

Explanation:

After hiking for hours the rest area appeared in the near distance.Which is the best revision of this sentence?

The rest area near the hikers appeared in the distance after hiking for hours.
After hiking for hours, the hikers saw the rest area appear in the near distance.
The hikers near the rest area appeared in the distance after hiking for hours.
After hiking for hours, in the near distance the hikers appeared at the rest area

Answers

The correct answer is B. After hiking for hours, the hikers saw the rest area appear in the near distance.

Explanation:

The original sentence or "After hiking for hours the rest area appeared in the near distance" aims at explaining some hikers had been hiking for hours and then they could see the rest area in the near distance; however, this meaning is not completely clear because in the original sentence it is not explicitly stated who was the person or entity that hiked for hours and then saw the rest area instead it is stated the rest area appeared which creates a confusing sentence.

Considering this, the best revision for this sentence would be to state it the entity or agent of the action and change the word "appear", therefore, the best revision is "After hiking for hours, the hikers saw the rest area appear in the near distance" as this explicitly states the "hikers" were the ones that hiked for hours and then they saw the rest are, which corrects the mistakes of the original sentence.

After hiking fir hours, the hikers saw the rest area in the near distance.