Answer:The answer is D as significant message or lesson.
Explanation:I just took a test on this and the answer that is verified is incorrect.
b. he
c. call
d. wants
Answer: the correct answer is B.
Explanation:
First person is the most effective and offers the fullest point of view from a narrative with the most cause and effects because from one character throughout the story, the story may give more of an effective use of describing words due to what the character thinks.
Second person is not as effective, though it is using the concept 'you'.
Third person is also effective, it shows everybody's point of view. However, because it is not from an individual, the point of view would not be focused and there would be little emotions/feelings etc to describe people.
Focusing on an individual would bring the most effect... FIRST PERSON.
Answer:
1 and 3
Explanation:
In 'The Knight's Tale,' The Knight, Palamon, and Arcite can be characterized based on their appearance, speech, description, and actions.
In 'The Knight's Tale,' there are several characters that can be characterized based on their appearance, speech, description, and actions.
#SPJ11
B.) Traditional energy sources generate more power than wind turbines.
C.) Wind power is the most unreliable renewable energy resource.
D.)Wind power is the most economical renewable energy resource.
Paragraph 5: Economic Benefits of Wind Energy
Wind energy is the lowest-priced renewable energy technology we have. It can cost between 4 and 6 cents per kilowatt-hour. At first glance, it can be argued that energy from traditional power sources such as gas can cost between 3.9 and 4.4 cents per kilowatt-hour. However, gas prices can rise and burning fuel releases pollutants and greenhouse gases into the air. Coal costs between 4.8 and 5.5 cents per kilowatt-hour. Because burning coal pollutes the air and coal mining destroys forests and soil quality, coal plants must meet strict environmental regulations. This makes it difficult and costly to build new coal plants. According to Synapse Energy Economics’ most recent report, if the use of wind energy was doubled in the mid-Atlantic and Great Lakes states, consumers could save $6.9 billion a year.
How well does the author address the counterclaims in paragraph 5 that fossil fuels are less expensive than wind power?
A.) The response is effective because the author lists added financial and environmental costs of using fossil fuels that raise the cost higher than what is stated.
B.) The response is effective because the author calls into question the reliability of the source information stated in the counterclaims.
C.) The response is ineffective because the statistics clearly show that energy from fossil fuels costs less than energy from wind power.
D.) The response is ineffective because the author chooses to ignore the information presented in the counterclaims.
Answer:
Question 1: D.)Wind power is the most economical renewable energy resource
Question 2: A.) The response is effective because the author lists added financial and environmental costs of using fossil fuels that raise the cost higher than what is stated.
Explanation:
Question 1: Which statement most accurately states a claim developed in paragraph 5?
A.) Traditional energy sources are safer for the planet than wind turbines.
Traditional energy sources are suggested to be a source of pollutants and greenhouse gases, making them a less safe option compared to renewable sources
B.) Traditional energy sources generate more power than wind turbines.
This is not mentioned in the paragraph
C.) Wind power is the most unreliable renewable energy resource.
This is not mentioned in the paragraph
D.)Wind power is the most economical renewable energy resource.
This is mentioned in the first line of the paragraph where it is stated that "wind energy is the lowest-prices renewable energy technology we have"
Question 2: How well does the author address the counterclaims in paragraph 5 that fossil fuels are less expensive than wind power?
A.) The response is effective because the author lists added financial and environmental costs of using fossil fuels that raise the cost higher than what is stated.
The additional financial (rising fuel prices) and environmental costs (pollutants, impacts of mining) are detailed to suggest non-quantified costs of traditional energy sources
B.) The response is effective because the author calls into question the reliability of the source information stated in the counterclaims.
The reliability of the source is not questioned, rather additional information is provided
C.) The response is ineffective because the statistics clearly show that energy from fossil fuels costs less than energy from wind power.
The statistics mentioned show that current prices of gas and coal (which may increase) result in energy costs comparable to energy generated from wind
D.) The response is ineffective because the author chooses to ignore the information presented in the counterclaims.
The information in the counterclaims is not ignored, alternate information is presented to show a different side