Which is a goal of socialists, but not those who support capitalism with regulations? A. government control of religion
B. total free-market economy
C. one-party dictatorship with limited elections
D. government control of the businesses that affect most citizens

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

While the capitalist strategy was one of private firms, the socialist program advocated for a significant role for government in society.

Explain about the capital strategy?

In order to optimize the capital appreciation of an investment portfolio over the long run, a capital growth strategy allocates assets in a way that favors securities with high anticipated returns.

A common strategy for investors aiming for capital growth is to distribute the different investments in a portfolio so as to make it diversified. Diversification reduces risk in a portfolio by dispersing the investments among several asset types, such as stocks and bonds.

Homes with high capital growth might be found in areas where demand is higher than supply. Prices increase as buyers compete for the few available properties. This frequently occurs in areas with good infrastructure, access to public transit, and employment opportunities (or these things are on the way).

To learn more about capital strategy refer to:

brainly.com/question/24462624

#SPJ2

Answer 2
Answer: D.

The socialist policy believed that the government should have a heavy involvement in the society, whereas the capitalist policy was one of private businesses.

Related Questions

How Abraham Lincoln honesty affect the outcome of the war?
Which of the following best describes John Adams?Fought with the British in the French and Indian War Spokesperson for the colonists about the Stamp Act Represented British soldiers in the Boston Massacre trials Organized the Boston Tea Party after Britain passed the Tea Act
Calculate the data and find the median.21, 17, 21, 25, 23, 13a21b13c20d25
What african american player helped desegregate the sport of baseball
Give an example of each of the Court’s two types of jurisdiction.

Why is Magellan not worth defending?

Answers

Magellan wasn't worth defending because he burnt down a village and he killed people. he was also bad to his fleet. he yelled at them and forced them to eat food that was bad for them and has been sitting there for days. So those are a few reasons to why he didn't deserve someone defending him. <br />

Final answer:

Ferdinand Magellan is sometimes seen as controversial due to his attempts to convert locals to Christianity, the failure of his mission after his death, and the competition between Portugal and Spain that his route to the Spice Islands stirred. However, he is still remembered today with monuments and other references.

Explanation:

Saying Ferdinand Magellan is not worth defending could be related to various reasons. He attempted to convert people to Christianity in territories he discovered, which not everyone finds commendable. He pledged to assist Rajah Humabon, the ruler of Cebu, in defeating a rival ruler, Lapulapu, and lost his life in the Battle of Mactan. After his death, his remaining crew abandoned their mission in the Philippines and returned to Spain, suggesting a failure to establish lasting connections with the locals.

In seeking an alternate route to the Spice Islands, Magellan's funding came from the Spanish king after being turned down by the Portuguese. Despite his initial dreams, Magellan’s expedition led to conflict and competition between Portugal and Spain, culminating in the signing of the Treaty of Zaragoza in 1529 to divide Pacific territories between the two nations.

Despite the controversies, Magellan's legacy persists in today's world. Monuments and references to him exist in the Philippines and elsewhere. However, his actions during his expeditions might cause some to question whether he is worth defending.

Learn more about Ferdinand Magellan here:

brainly.com/question/18332808

#SPJ3

7. How did authors in the years after World War I portray the concept of war differently than previousgenerations?

Answers

The first world war differs from the previous wars because it relies on modern industrial technology.

What do you mean by war?

The first world war was different from previous wars because it rely on advanced industrial technology and elaborated the economic and political organization of belligerent nations.

It was the first widespread use of machine guns, submarine operations, and vehicles.

Learn more about War here:

brainly.com/question/11375126

#SPJ2

The World War I was mainly described as The Great War - which was indicated, that it was the biggest and the most terrible war that ever happened. Till The World War II, none of previous wars engaged as many countries and caused as many deaths.

The student involved in New Jersey v. T.L.O. argued that

Answers

The student argued that the school violated her 4th amendment rights.

The 4th amendment of the US Constitution protects against illegal search and seizures. This means that the government/law enforcement agencies must have a warrant in order to search someone's personal property.

However, the Supreme Court ruled against TLO. The Supreme Court ruled that school administrators have more flexibility to search bags if there is reasonable suspicion present.

The student involved in New Jersey v. T.L.O. argued that  the Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures had been violated.


Can u Mark Brainliest Please :) Hope it helps

What did jim crow laws do?

Answers

Jim Crow's laws allowed the segregation of public schools, public places, and public transportation, and the segregation of restrooms, restaurants, and drinking fountains for whites and blacks.

Hope this helped you, please mark me brainliest!

It segregated blacks and whites

Hope this helped! :)

In which meeting was the proposal to draft the Declaration of Independence presented?

Answers

The second Continental Congress drafts the Declaration of Independence, on June 11, 1776.

Richard Henry Lee had added a decision on June 7; Congress laid the draught apart to speak about it. His notion informed Congress to attract a colonial confederation plan, claim independence, and construct worldwide alliances.

Resolved that those United Colonies are, and with the aid of using proper ought to be, unfastened and impartial States, that they may be unfastened from all responsibilities to the British Crown, and that each one ties to the State of Great Britain, whether or not non-public or political, are, and ought to be, absolutely severed.

So, Thomas Jefferson of Virginia, Robert R. Livingston of New York, and John Adams of Massachusetts can be met for the Declaration of Independence.

Learn more about Continental Congress, here:

brainly.com/question/3150495

#SPJ4

Pretty sure its was the meeting of the second continental congress, because the congress met on July 1, 1776, and some members would spend the next 2 days revising it. It was finally adopted by congress on July 4, 1776, but they signed it nearly a month after congress adopted it.

Write an argument that states your opinion on this question:Is lobbying good or bad for democracy? Why?
Write one to two paragraphs totaling at least five sentences in response to the prompt.

Answers

In thinking through this answer, it is important to begin with a definition of lobbying.

Lobbying is the actions of an interest group to inform and sway the vote of a legislator or policymaker.

The benefit of lobbying is that the interest groups often have subject matter expertise that the legislators might not have.

Lobbying can be bad when the legislators are not being lobbied equally, that is, the two sides of the argument that they are considering and are being educated on are represented by interests groups with vary different levels of power. This means that while the legislator or policymaker is being educated, the argument backed by more money and power is likely to win out.

Answer: YES

Explanation:

Maybe