Which two entrepreneurs believed they were examples of social Darwinism at work?

Answers

Answer 1

Answer: It would be "Andrew Carnegie" and "Cecile Rhodes" that believed they were examples of social Darwinism at work, since they felt it was not only their right but their duty to take what they could from society.

Answer 2

Answer:

Andrew Carnegie and Cecile Rhodes

Explanation:

social theory. Social Darwinism, the theory that human groups and races are subject to the same laws of natural selection as Charles Darwin perceived in plants and animals in nature.

Many Social Darwinists embraced laissez-faire capitalism and racism. They believed that government should not interfere in the “survival of the fittest” by helping the poor, and promoted the idea that some races are biologically superior to others.

Andrew Carnegie and Cecile Rhodes believed that the inequality that inevitably resulted from industrial capitalism was not inherently bad. Competition in society, as in the natural world, sorted people out according to their abilities.

Related Questions

Which of these innovations led to increased production in American factories in the early 1800s?the invention of the mechanical reaperthe use of interchangeable partsthe availability of electricitythe construction of canals
Mark each statement if it is a key characteristic of Greek drama and theater. A. Greek theaters had a circular or semicircular stage called an orchestra. B. Only men could be actors, even when characters in a play were female. C. Women formed a chorus that sang behind the actors. D. The Greeks did not want to feel sad at the theater.
President Woodrow Wilson won the 1919 Nobel Peace Prize for getting Congress to approve the United States' entrance into the League of Nations.a. True b. False
The main difference between sectionalism and federalism is that sectionalism...
What influence did the Aryans have on the people of Indus Valley ?

Given what you know about the Civil Rights Act of 1960, answer the following questions citing specific evidence to support your response. Your responses should be at least three sentences long.1. Under which president was the law signed? How was it similar to the Civil Rights Act of 1957?
2. What were the main provisions of the law? Explain at least four provisions.
3. Explain at least two shortcomings of the law.
4. Given what you know about the Voting Rights Act of 1960, do you think that the law was effective? Why or why not?
Remember to use correct spelling, grammar, and conventions.

Answers

Answer:

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the most significant civil rights legislation since the Reconstruction era.

1. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson. The law was similar to the Civil Rights Act of 1957 in that it aimed to protect the voting rights of African Americans.

2. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 had several key provisions, including:

Prohibiting discrimination in public accommodations, such as hotels, restaurants, and theaters.
Prohibiting discrimination in employment based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
Authorizing the Attorney General to bring lawsuits to desegregate schools and other public facilities.
Establishing the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to investigate and enforce claims of discrimination in employment.

3. Two shortcomings of the law were:

It did not explicitly address voting rights, despite being a major focus of the Civil Rights Movement at the time.
It faced resistance and noncompliance from some states and businesses, which hindered its effectiveness in achieving its goals.

4. It is worth noting that there was no Voting Rights Act of 1960. However, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was a significant piece of legislation that aimed to address the shortcomings of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 regarding voting rights. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was highly effective in dismantling barriers to voting that had been used to disenfranchise African Americans in the South. By eliminating discriminatory practices such as literacy tests and poll taxes, the law paved the way for greater participation by African Americans in the political process.

Which of these does the media allow the public to do?

Answers

The choices can be found elsewhere and as follows:

stay informed about current and proposed laws
gain a comprehensive understanding of policy
ensure that everyone has access to the same information
develop highly informed opinions about current events

I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is the first option. It would be staying informed about current and proposed laws that the media allows the public to do. Most of the news nowadays are regarding politics and other information that is related to the government.

What does Miss Mowcher suffer from? a Dwarfism b Cancer c Malaria d Alcoholism

Answers

Miss Mowcher suffer from dwarfism.

An example of a law that is justified in limiting individual freedom in order to protect the rights of others isA.) prohibiting trespassing on private property.
B.) preventing a female from attaining a driver's license because of her gender.
C.) denying a citizen the right to vote based on race.
D.) preventing a person from speaking at a town meeting.

Answers

Answer:

An example of a law that is justified in limiting individual freedom in order to protect the rights of others is prohibiting trespassing on private property.

Explanation:

Each person's freedom is essential to a fully fulfilling life. When someone does not have his own freedom, he cannot develop as a person. Freedom of expression, freedom of thought, movement and action are fundamental to anyone.

However, it is sometimes necessary that this individual's right to liberty be limited to protect the freedom of other individuals. An example of this is the law that prohibits trespassing on private property. You see, our right to individual liberty allows us to enter where we want, but that right has to be limited with respect to private property. We cannot invade private property because it takes away the freedom and security of others.

Choice B, C, and D all go against citizen's rights. I believe the answer would be A.

What did John Locke believe was the purpose of government?