The supreme Court case Worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the Cherokee Nation in Georgia because ita. Ruled that the US government's Indian Removal Act was unconstitutional.
b. Struck down laws created by the Georgia legislature.
c. Established the Indian Territory east of the Mississippi in present-day Oklahoma.
d. Declared that the US government would honor the Cherokee Nation's constitution.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

The Supreme Court case Worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the Cherokee Nation in Georgia because it struck down the laws created by the Georgian legislature.

Further Explanation:

Worcester V Georgia (1832) abandoned the judgement of Samuel Worcester by Supreme Court. It also held the Georgia criminal statute which was forbidding non-Native Americans to live on Americans native land without license. It was unconstitutional.

Samuel Austin Worcester was translator of Bible, protector of the Cherokee'ssovereignty and a missionary to Cherokee He made collaboration with Elias Boudinot to establish the Cherokee Phoenix, first American newspaper in vernacular language. Migration of European American settlers from coastal areas towards Cherokee territory even after making land cessions to the US government became prevalent. Worchester and his sponsor plotted to fight against the encroachment through court. They even want to take the case to the Supreme Court to explain the relation between the federal and the state government to establish the sovereignty of Cherokee nation.

Ex- U.S Attorney General, William Writ argued their position in US Supreme court. Cherokee Nation was described as a domestic dependent nation with no authority binding on a state by Chief Justice Marshall.

Worcester along with other eleven missionaries protested and published a resolution against the Georgia Law in1830 forbidding white men from living on the land of America without state license. According to the Worcester by obeying this law they will be compromising their sovereignty. After implementation of the law, Worcester and many others were charged for disobeying the law. They refuse to get the license.

Learn more:

1. DoesSupreme Court ruled in William Furman’s favor, saying that Georgia had in Furman v. Georgia (1972)? brainly.com/question/2816742

2. The Supreme Court is best characterized as?brainly.com/question/407715

Answer Details:

Grade: High school

Subject: US History

Chapter: Georgia Legislature

Keywords: Worcester V Georgia, Samuel Worcester, Supreme Court, Georgia, Native American, Samuel Austin Worcester, Cherokee’s sovereignty, Elias Boudinot, Cherokee Phoenix, U.S Attorney General, William Writ

Answer 2
Answer:

Answer: B. struck down laws created by the Georgia legislature to seize Cherokee lands

Explanation: The decision in Worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the Cherokee Nation because it struck down laws created by the Georgia legislature to seize Cherokee lands. Judge John Marshall wrote that the Indian Nations were independent political communities entitled to their own natural rights.


Related Questions

Individuals described as "left of center" have a. liberal views and are likely to support policies that restrict government services b. liberal views and are likely to support policies that expand government services c. conservative views and are likely to support policies that restrict government services d. conservative views and are likely to support policies that expand government services
Where was the first enslaved person recorded?Select the best answer from the choices provided. A.Virginia B.Mississippi C.South Carolina D.Missouri
When did Saigon fall to the communists? June 17, 1972 January 27, 1973 August 9, 1974 April 30, 1975
Combine these ideas into one sentence using an adverb clause. Prepare to go on stage. I will tell you the best time.
Following the period of the Crusades A) Christian invaders adopted Muslim scientific learning and military techniques. B) Christian invaders destroyed most evidence of Muslim intellectual achievements. Eliminate C) Muslim defenders repeatedly lost major portions of their empire to the Christians. D) Muslim defenders adopted Christian military practices in order to defeat their foes.

Which of the following best describes the purpose of the U.S. Constitution?A. It restricts the rights of citizens.
B. It outlines how the government should function.
C. It establishes a national bank.
D. It outlines basic rights for people all around the world.

Answers

Answer:

I believe its D

Explanation:

I took the test not long ago

In which colony would an enslaved person most likely live in 1760?A.Massachusetts
B.New York
C.Georgia
D.Rhode Island

Answers

Georgia is the most likely for an enslaved person to live in

Which of the following is the equivalent to Congress in the United States? a. President c. Court System b. General Congress d. Senate

Answers

general congress becuase of congress in the united states tell me if you get it

What was the state of the many, diverse, religions in India under British rule?A. They were, for the most part, united behind a goal for independence.
B. There was almost constant conflict between Hindus and Muslims.
C. India was almost entirely Hindu, so there was not much religious diversity.
D. Most religions were outlawed under British rule, with the exception of Christianity.

Answers

from all these answers the answer would be A - they were, for the most part, united behind a goal for independence.

What kind of items were found at a public square in Temixtilan

Answers

Both necessities and jewels were found at a public square in Temixtitlan.

In the 1800s, Border Ruffians and Free Soilers both wanted toA. influence the territorial elections in Kansas.
B. influence the territorial elections in Nebraska.
C. establish Nebraska as a free territory.
D. establish Kansas as a slave territory.

Answers

In the 1800's, Border Ruffians and Free Soilers both wanted to A) influence the territorial elections in Kansas. The Border Ruffians wanted slavery to exist in Kansas, while the Free Soilers were in favor of abolishing slavery in Kansas. We can say that they wanted to achieve this through territorial elections in the state.

In the 1800's, Border Ruffians and Free Soldiers both wanted  influence the territorial elections in Kansas. Option A is correct.

Border Ruffians was the name that pro-slavery activists  from the slave state of Missouri received in Kansas. In 1854 to 1860, Border Ruffians crossed the state border into Kansas Territory aiming to force the acceptance of slavery there.