The Dardanelles Campaign was a __________ for _____________.a. success/France
b. success/Russia
c. failure/Great Britain
d. failure/Ottoman Empire

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The Dardanelles Campaign was a great "failure" for "Great Britain," and the fact that Winston Churchill was a leader during this campaign made it very hard for him to attain the political office he wanted. 
Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

The Dardanelles campaign was a failure for Great Britain.

Explanation:

In the first place the Dardanelles campaign was a failure for Great Britain. Because, it was a very important strategic point due to its geographical location and the utility it provided to the power who dominated it. In second place because it was a big impact into Great Britain's and French's alliance reputation. But in third place because major personalities like Winston Churchill himself were in command of that fight and they weren't able to achieve success in it. But in fourth place because it made a perfect combination of failure with the Gallipoli defeat and dragged too much attention to the strength of the alliance.


Related Questions

Why do you think so many young Americans became so vocal in their condemnation of the Vietnam War?
Are most civil cases resolved by a trial?
One of the Patriots’ greatest strengths was theirA. reliance on local militia. B. persistence in fighting. C. superior troop numbers. D. well-trained soldiers
Name two conditions that make a helper at the nest strategy likely to evolve?
List some of the occupations open to women by the war

Why did president truman use the atomic bomb on japan?

Answers

President Truman used them during the war so the Japanese can surrender quickly.

Why did Japanese Americans sue the United States government?

Answers

Answer:

Because they were put in internment camps because they were Japanese because the United States had the mentality of "one Japanese person did this to us so everyone from the same country as them must be bad as well"

Explanation:

so they were suing for basically putting innocent people in camps, taking them away from their homes, and making them suffer

How did Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcom X differ in their approaches to gaining civil rights?

Answers

Martin Luther King Jr. believed in peaceful protests. He led many non-violent organizations and protests, such as the March on Washington and the Montgomery Bus Boycott. He wanted everyone to be equal. Malcolm X, the head of the Nation of Islam, on the other hand believed that blacks were a superior being and that they didn't have to listen to what the white man said. He believed that they should show their superiority by any means possible even if that meant violence had to be used.

Scientists in ancient Greece believed thatthe study of science was connected to feeling and emotion.
the study of science was connected to magic and mysticism.
everything in the world could be explained by logic and reason.
everything in the world could be explained by faith and religion.

Answers

I believe the answer is: Everything in the world could be explained by Logic and reason.

This belief later adopted by other countries in Europe led to the age of enlightenment, when people start to abandon superstition and start to pursue scientific knowledge to address the problems that people have.

Inventions to make people's life easier and the creation of social system that transfer the power from the monarchs to the people start to gradually arise ever since.

Everything in the world could be explained by Logic and reason.

Which American Indian nation tried to resist removal from the southeast through a series of wars at the beginning of the 1800s?Select the best answer from the choices provided.
Cherokee
Creek
Seminole
Chickasaw

Answers

Seminoles tried to resist, which was why the Indian Removal Act was more expensive than planned

Answer:

The Cherokee

Explanation:

The Cherokee chose to use legal action to resist removal. Their lawsuits, notably Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831) and Worcester v. Georgia (1832), reached the U.S. Supreme Court but ultimately provided no relief.

in 1963 what two recommendations did a group of Alabama clergymen propose to resolve the racial conflict in Birmingham, Alabama?

Answers

For the answer to the question above asking in 1963 what two recommendations did a group of Alabama, clergymen propose to resolve the racial conflict in Birmingham, Alabama?
I think you are referring to
The Martin Luther King Jr Plagiarism Story (1994) by Theodore Pappas.