How did the open door policy help prevent any one nation from monopolizing trade with China

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The treaty guaranteed equal trade agreements with European countries and the US.

The Open Door Policy was announced by the US as interest was increasing in China. The goal of the policy was to ensure China remained a sovereign nation but also gave each country an equal opportunity to trade with China. Great Britain, France, Germany, Russia, and Japan agreed to the policy and it was widely accepted in the US as a means of a negotiating economic foreign policy in Asia. This agreement ensured China would not be divided into many colonial segments.
Answer 2
Answer: The main way in which the Open Door Policy helped prevent any one nation from monopolizing trade with China is that it was formed an agreement between China, the US, and other European powers in which every entity agreed to trade equally and fairly with all involved. 

Related Questions

The president’s role as chief executive is to
What was the purpose of the poll tax?
Which of the following was a factor in whether or not a dynasty had the Mandate of Heaven? A. the wealth of a ruling dynasty B. the spiritual commitment of a ruling dynasty C. the religious level of a ruling dynasty D. the strength of a ruling dynasty
How did african american lose their rights after reconstruction
Laws are passed to regulate the funding of political campaigns in an effort to ensure that

After the Roman Empire was divided, there were two capitals. What were they? Athens Rome Istanhul Constantinople

Answers

hmm I did not know the second one, but I do know the first one: constantinople

Name 3 ways that the war had become a global war – as opposed to simply a ground war fought in Europe.

Answers

in the case of WW 1 it was mainly because all of the countries involved held colonies in other areas of the globe, thus spreading the influence of the war. For example, Britain called on her colonies like New Zealand and Australia to help, thus including Pacific nations in the war. Reason 2 for WW 1 was because at the time all nations of military significance (except the US) could be located in Europe. Europe was most certainly the powerhouse of the world, where all the greatest nations could be found. This meant that when the war kicked off, not only did it concern the European nations but many smaller Asian nations like Japan who relied on European powers for trade and supplies. If even one European power at the time was to be eliminated entirely, there would be a massive power vacuum which could prove dangerous for the rest of the world as well. 

WW 2 is a slightly different story.
1) Britain was no longer the greatest, largest colonial empire in the world, but still held a lot of influence in world politics. The formation of "The league of nations" (which was a primitive form of the United Nations) after WW 1 was largely because of Britain and France, and while the LoN had peaceful intentions, they had no army to back up the treaties and clauses they put in place, thus, when push came to shove, the LoN failed to stop another great war. The League included many countries from outside of Europe, which spread the effect of the war.
3) The US was directly involved in WW 2 (it was not in WW 1, they did however provide loans to France and Britain) thus spreading the fighting to the Pacific and South-East Asia.
2) China was weak, and Japan was able to take advantage of this by taking over Manchuria (a Chinese province) in 1931 providing them with the raw resources and food production required to build a large army. This was one of many short-comings of the LoN, as they did nothing to stop Japan from invading Manchuria, which made things much more difficult in the long run.

I hope this helps :)

Answer:

WW 2 is a slightly different story.

1) Britain was no longer the greatest, largest colonial empire in the world, but still held a lot of influence in world politics. The formation of "The league of nations" (which was a primitive form of the United Nations) after WW 1 was largely because of Britain and France, and while the LoN had peaceful intentions, they had no army to back up the treaties and clauses they put in place, thus, when push came to shove, the LoN failed to stop another great war. The League included many countries from outside of Europe, which spread the effect of the war.

3) The US was directly involved in WW 2 (it was not in WW 1, they did however provide loans to France and Britain) thus spreading the fighting to the Pacific and South-East Asia.

2) China was weak, and Japan was able to take advantage of this by taking over Manchuria (a Chinese province) in 1931 providing them with the raw resources and food production required to build a large army. This was one of many short-comings of the LoN, as they did nothing to stop Japan from invading Manchuria, which made things much more difficult in the long run.

Explanation:

In which way is the freedom of speech and Civil Rights Act of 1964 (which made segregation illegal) similar?A) both establish justiceB) both provide for the common defenseC) both secure the freedoms of libertyD) both form a more perfect union

Answers

The correct option is C; BOTH SECURES THE FREEDOM OF LIBERTY.
The freedom of speech upholds that every human has the right to express their opinion and to freely receive and give out information. The Civil Right Act of 1964 ended segregation in public places and stop employment segregation that is based on racial differences. These two acts secure the liberty of freedom for all. 

The correct option is C

  • The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a landmark legislation in the United States that prohibits unequal application of voter registration requirements and racial segregation in schools, blood banks, in the workplace and facilities that serve the public in general ("public places").
  • Freedom of expression is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or a community to articulate their opinions and ideas without fear of reprisal, censorship or punishment.

I have no misgivings about, or lack of confidence in the cause in which I am engaged, and my courage does not halt or falter. I know how strongly American Civilization now leans on the triumph of the Government and how great a debt we owe to those who went before us through the blood and sufferings of the Revolution. And I am willing—perfectly willing—to lay down all my joys in this life, to help maintain this Government, and to pay that debt. Read this excerpt from a letter by Civil War soldier Sullivan Ballou. Which cause does Ballou support?

Answers

Answer:

Ballou supported the Union.

Explanation:

The excerpt written by Sullivan Ballou, shown in the question above, shows how he felt in debt to those who fought during the American Revolution to create the government he knew, so it was his duty to support that government and to fight without any doubt or doubt. lack of confidence that this government would be maintained and strengthened.

These thoughts could not arise from a soldier of the Confederate cause, because Confederate soldiers believed that the government was unfair to the southern states and therefore that government should be undone and the Confederate states (the southern states) should be withdrawn of that government and create its own government.

For this reason, we can say that Sullivan Ballou supported the cause of the northern states, that is, the Union.

Well the south did not want to preserve the government they wanted to succeed from the union this person wants to maintain the government so I hope that helps.

What was integral to the spread of Enlightenment from Europe to America?

Answers

Answer:

Political attitudes and proposals were integral to the spread of Enlightement from Europe to America. Enlightement main authors wrote about them:

"John Locke defended the displacement of a monarch who would not protect the lives, liberties, and property of the English people. JEAN-JACQUES ROUSSEAU stated that society should be ruled by the "general will" of the people. BARON DE MONTESQUIEU declared that power should not be concentrated in the hands of any one individual. He recommended separating power among executive, legislative, judicial branches of government. American intellectuals began to absorb these ideas."

Reference: ushistory.org. “The Impact of Enlightenment in Europe.” Ushistory.org, Independence Hall Association

An educated financial and social elite in European colonies in the Americas.

Who was the first woman to become a Supreme Court justice?Shirley Chisholm

Sandra Day O'Connor

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Janet Reno

Answers

The correct answer is Sandra Day O'Connor. It was Sandra Day O'Connor who was the first ever woman to become a Supreme justice. She was an American jurist and was appointed by President Ronald Raegan (she was the first Supreme Court justice to be appointed by the President.)

Answer:

Sandra Day O'Connor

Explanation: