Why did President Johnson deviate his original plan of punishing southerners by making it difficult to reenter the union?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: This is a highly contested question, but most believed that he became far more lenient with the South because of a strong racist attitude, and the fact that many rich Southern planters "pleaded" for mercy. 

Related Questions

How did Muslim cities promote the sharing and diffusion of scientific knowledge across various cultures?
Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal reforms sparked an ongoing national debate on the proper role of government. the legitimacy of Roosevelt’s election. the necessity of private business. the need to end the Great Depression.
What percentage of slaves brought from Africa ended up In North America
Which is the first step in the creation of an informative essay? gathering and evaluating sources organizing a works cited page generating a “yes” or “no” question generating a research question
Why did diseases from Africa affect people in the Americas in the early 1500s?

What impact did railroads have on cities across the United States at the turn of the twentieth century?

Answers

For many historians the impact is concerned to the many cities became industrial centres.  

This happened because railroads helped with the transportation of goods to others places and in a faster way.  

There was a masive amount of construction was only a tiny piece of the large and varied impact of rail travel on the development of the United States.  

Many cities became industrial centers. Hope this helps!!

in "the legend of sleepy hollow," who is ichabod crane? a. a lonely child with few friends and an interest in local legends and folklore b. a friendly old man with a lot of money but not much ambition c. a burly, tough villager with a short temper and little patience d. a tall, skinny schoolteacher with a huge appetite and a vivid imagination

Answers

He is a tall, skinny schoolteacher with a huge appetite and a vivid imagination
D-  a tall skinny schoolteacher with a huge appetite and  vivid imagination

Why did Chamberlain suggest appeasement? Under what conditions would he fight? if he was forced to fight he would

Answers

Answer;
He suggested the appeasement plan because the British people, like most of Europe wanted to avoid another world war, and Chamberlain actually trusted Hitler. He said however that he would fight if the British nation was in danger.
The appeasement plan was the idea of identifying the socio-economic problems and events of other countries and anticipate their demands and reaching compromises.
Conditions under which he would fight; 
Chamberlain had directly stated that he was willing to fight over much more prevalent debacles in society or only be willing to fight over much greater issues facing the countries, which includes fighting in order to stop a country that was utilizing merciless and ruthless force in a valiant attempt to try and take over the world gradually. However, he also directly stated that he always prefers diplomacy as well as Chamberlain primarily favoring appeasement.
The main reason why Chamberlain suggested appeasement was because the British people, like most of Europe wanted to avoid another world war, and Chamberlain actually trusted Hitler. He said however that he would fight if the British nation was in danger. 

What is one similarity in Mesopotamian, Egyptian, Indus Valleyand ancient China was that they each developed *
A.
Democratic governments
B.
Monotheistic religion
C.
Irrigation systems
D.
Industrialized economies

Answers

C. Irrigation Systems

The U.S. military base at Pearl Harbor was attacked by _____. Germany Italy China Japan

Answers

Pearl harbor was attacked by Japan

1. Read the quote by Raphael Lemkin.Genocide is the criminal intent to destroy or to cripple permanently a human group. The acts are directed against groups as such, and individuals are selected for destruction only because they belong to these groups.

What is most significant about this quote by Raphael Lemkin?

Raphael Lemkin’s definition was the accepted version out of many.
Raphael Lemkin’s definition was not accepted until after the Holocaust.
Raphael Lemkin spoke these words on his death bed.
Raphael Lemkin spoke these words to the United Nations in 1945.

2. On December 9, 1948, in the shadow of the Holocaust and in no small part due to the tireless efforts of Lemkin himself, the United Nations approved the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. This convention establishes "genocide” as an international crime, which signatory nations “undertake to prevent and punish.” It defines genocide as:

Genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

Killing members of the group;
Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group

Answers

Answers to #1:

Raphael Lemkin's definition of genocide was not accepted until after the Holocaust.

Raphael Lemkin had been studying the problem of mass killings of a people group since the 1920s, in regard to Turkish slaughter of Armenians in 1915.  He coined the term "genocide" in 1944, in reference then also to the Holocaust.  The term uses Greek language roots and means "killing of a race" of people.  Lemkin served as an advisor to Justice Robert Jackson, the lead prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials.  "Crimes against humanity" was the charge used at the Nuremberg trials, since no international legal definition of "genocide" had yet been accepted.  Ultimately, Lemkin was able to persuade the United Nations to accept the definition of genocide and codify it into international law.  In December, 1948, the United Nations adopted the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, which made use of a number of Lemkin's ideas on the subject.

#2:   For item #2, you didn't ask a question, so I won't attempt to guess at what question you might have in mind.  The definition as you quote it comes from Article II of the UN's Genocide Convention.  Article III also indicts intention and conspiracy to commit genocide as crimes against international law.  Article IV of that same Convention then puts teeth into the UN's action, saying, "Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals."

#1) What is most significant about this quote by Raphael Lemkin?

Answer: After carefully reading the quote by Raphael Lemkin I concluded that what was most significant about this quote is that this definition was not accepted until after the Holocaust.

#2) the United Nations approved the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

Answer: This can be found in the United nations Treaty in Article II.

I hope it helps, Regards.