Please help!!!!What was the significance of the Supreme Court's ruling in the Maybury vs. Madison case?

A) The ruling determined that Congress could act against the president if it wished.

B) The ruling determined that the Supreme Court was more powerful than the president.

C) The ruling determined that laws that violated the U.S. Constitution could be thrown out.

D) The ruling determined that presidents could not remove judges appointed by their predecessor.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The primary significance of the Supreme Court's ruling in the Marbury vs. Madison case is that "C) The ruling determined that laws that violated the U.S. Constitution could be thrown out," since this established "judicial review". 
Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

The correct answer is C. The Supreme Court's ruling in Marbury v. Madison determined that laws that violated the U.S. Constitution could be thrown out.

Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.


Related Questions

The Republic of Texas existed from 1836 to 1845 before Texas joined the United States. Besides the likelihood of war with Mexico, why did annexation take so long?
if you were a land commissioner during the modern history of Hawaii, what would percentage of land would you give to the king, chiefs and commoners?
True or False : The republican radicals in congress disagreed with both Lincoln's and Johnson's reconstruction plans because they thought they were too lenient
Match each ecosystem with its location.Match Term Definition Alpine A) Alaska and Northern Canada Tundra B) Central United States Grassland C) High mountain ranges Deciduous forest D) Southwestern United States Desert E) Eastern United States
How did the Versailles Treaty lead to World War Two?

Why were the jobs in each region different as a slave

Answers

Because slaves were forced in doing things. Jobs were opinional. Have a great weekend!!

Because different regions of the colonies had different soil properties and different ways of life .


I hope that's help !

What eventually happened to the Spanish Armada as they went on theattack?(include why they retreated and what happened to them)

Answers

Answer:

A giant Spanish invasion fleet was completed by 1587, but Sir Francis Drake's daring raid on the Armada's supplies in the port of Cadiz delayed the Armada's departure until May 1588. ... Delayed by storms that temporarily forced it back to Spain, the Armada did not reach the southern coast of England until July 19.

Explanation:

When would the government be allowed to limit what people say?

Answers

Occasionally, a government sees itself as being justified in limiting what people say during emergencies, since they think that free speech during such times can harm a fragile country.
the government will never be able to limit what people say unless its a threat 

The graph shows the number of Jews in Palestine in the years leading up to World War I. A bar graph showing the number of Jewish residents in Palestine for the years 1880, 1900, and 1914. 1880, 24 thousand; 1900, 48,000; 1914, 84,000. Someone looking at these figures in 1914 would most likely predict that the number of Jewish residents in Palestine will level off. decline. continue to increase. triple by 1920.

Answers

Answer:

C. Continue to Increase

Explanation:

In Year 1880, the Jewish population in Palestine was 24,000;

In Year 1900, the Jewish population in Palestine was 48,000; and

In the Year 1914, the Jewish population in Palestine was 84,000.

From the figures, we notice an increase in the Jewish population as the year increases. Therefore, someone looking at the Jewish population in 1914 would most likely predict that the number of Jewish residents in Palestine will continue to increase.

Answer: continue to increase

Explanation:

What most affected the agreement between the United States and GreatBritain over the Canadian border?
O
A. Both countries had trouble controlling their settlers in the disputed
area.
O
B. Neither country knew the value of resources in the disputed land.
O
C. Both countries looked to other powerful nations to help settle the
issue.
D. Neither country was willing to start another war.
SUBMIT

Answers

Both countries had trouble controlling their settlers in the disputed

area thus it affected the treaty oregon agreement between us and great britain.

Explanation:

  • The Oregon treaty is agreement  between US and great britain signed in Washington DC dated 15 June 1846.
  • This treaty was signed in order to establish 49th parallel primary international boundary on the northwest of pacific.  
  • Both Britain and we believed that they had a prior historical claim of Columbia river but after many references to the documents there existed a dispute between us and Britain. But both were not willing to get into the war. Thus the US senate lend the hand for the compromise thus the final treaty signed on 15 June and ratified on 19 June 1846.

Final answer:

The agreement between the United States and Great Britain over the Canadian border was affected by the challenge both countries faced in controlling their settlers.

Explanation:

The correct answer is A.  Both countries had trouble controlling their settlers in the disputed area.

The agreement between the United States and Great Britain over the Canadian border was affected by the challenge both countries faced in controlling their settlers in the disputed area. Settlers from both countries were crossing the border and establishing settlements, which created tension and led to conflicts.

For example, the Aroostook War in 1839 was a result of clashes between American and Canadian settlers in the disputed territory between Maine and New Brunswick. This conflict highlighted the difficulty both countries experienced in maintaining control over their settlers.

Learn more about US-Canada Border Agreement here:

brainly.com/question/10349170

#SPJ12

Which of the following addressed the issue of slavery at the Constitutional Convention? A. The Virginia Plan B. The Great Compromise C. The Three-Fifths Compromise D. The New Jersey Plan

Answers

(C)The Great compromise