What are the three types of fallacies that structural linguists find in traditional grammar?normative, semantic, logical
transform, morphology, phoneme
syntactic, structural, generative

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

The correct answer is A. Normative, semantic, logical

Explanation:

The word linguistics refer to the study of language and the elements that are part of it, because of this, there are different approaches including the traditional and the structural approaches that aim at understanding language from different perspectives. In the case of the traditional approach, it was believed language was composed of fixed structures that could be applied in all cases. On the other hand, the structural approach understood language as a structure that can be described by understanding the units that composed it which are not fixed but varies according to multiple linguistic elements.

Due to this, structural linguistics criticized the traditional linguistics in terms of grammar as they believed there were multiple fallacies or incorrect ideas in considering grammar from the perspective traditional linguistics did. This included the normative fallacy as in traditional grammar there are standards for using the language, but according to structural linguistics language change and there are no static norms for it; the semantic fallacy as in traditional grammar the study of language is guided the meaning of words, but for structural linguistics this was not precise or objective and  the logical fallacy as traditional grammar supported the idea of universal laws that could be applied to all languages but structural linguistics believed this was not true.

Thus, the three types of fallacies that structural linguistics find in traditional grammar were the normative, the semantic and the logical considering the beliefs of structural linguistics about these three concepts were opposite to the beliefs of linguistics of traditional grammar and due to this, they called these fallacies or false ideas.

Answer 2
Answer: I would say that the three types of fallacies that structural linguists find in traditional grammar are normative, semantic, and logical. 

Related Questions

He took the bad news with surprising 1.witheredness 2.pavilion 3.detachedness 4.resignation and showed no emotion
Which one of the following is a correct spelling of a plural noun?a. buffaloes b. gooses c. knifes d. oxes
What change was made in the second sentence?The holidays are just around the corner. The holidays are just around the corner, so I need to go shopping. A. inverted subject-verb order B. created a compound sentence C. inverted subject-object order D. added a prepositional phrase
Sandy skied into a pine tree. She broke her leg.What is the best way to combine these sentences?Sandy skied into a pine tree and broke her leg. Sandy skied into a pine tree she broke her leg. Sandy skied into a pine tree; broke her leg. Sandy skied into a pine tree, broke her leg.
An author who evokes vivid images in the mind of the reader is usinga. syntax.b. allegory.c. imagery.d. metaphor.

Easy 7th grade work on inferences ! Please help fast !

Answers

Answer:

1.  It may be cloudy outside

2. The student may be in trouble

3. The food at school is not good

4. The loud music caused them to lose most of their hearing

5. It rained while you were watching the movie inside

Hopefully these are right...I never really had to do this in 7th grade..

:)

Explanation:

When a book has an editor instead of an author, the researcher records only the title and publication information, not the name of the editor on a source card.a. True
b. False

Answers

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Even when a book has an editor instead of an author, it is important for the researcher to record this information. An editor is still an important contributor to the particular work. More importantly, having the name of the editor can help future researchers find the cited source more easily.

b. False
This is not true as they record more than the title and publication. They also name the editor on a source.

Which helped to make roosevelts four freedoms speech interesting and relevant to his audience

Answers

He made the Four Freedoms speech relevant and interesting to his audience by applying his speech to the crisis of the world war happening in Europe.  He emphasized the importance of democracy and how it protected the four freedoms in his speech which were essential to have a free society.


Explanation:

He understood the various needs of his audience.

Freedom of speech is to talk freely while not censorship. Freedom of speech is protected by the primary change to the u. s. Constitution, likewise as several state and federal laws.

The four points were

Freedom of speech and expression.

2. Freedom of worship.

3. Freedom of wish.

4. Freedom from concern.

He made the Four Freedoms speech relevant and interesting to his audience by applying his speech to the crisis of the world war happening in Europe.  He emphasized the importance of democracy and how it protected the four freedoms in his speech which were essential to have a free society.

Read the sentence.Pronounce each syllable.

How does pronouncing each syllable of a word help you spell it correctly?

A.
Saying the word out loud helps you see the pattern of letters.

B.
Saying the word out loud is the easiest way to check its origin.

C.
Saying the word out loud helps you hear the sounds.

D.
Saying the word out loud is the best way to make sure the word is spelled correctly.

Answers

Saying the word out loud is the best way to make sure the word is spelled correctly. Therefore option D is correct.

When you say a word out loud, you engage both auditory and kinesthetic senses, which can help reinforce your memory of the correct spelling.

Pronouncing the word allows you to hear the sounds and syllables, which can assist in recognizing any discrepancies between the pronunciation and the spelling.

By speaking the word, you activate your oral muscles and articulate the sounds, which can create a stronger connection between the auditory representation of the word and its written form.

This can be particularly helpful in cases where the spelling might not follow standard patterns or might have irregularities.

Know more about syllables:

brainly.com/question/4541578

#SPJ2

Answer:

D is the correct answer for this problem.

Explanation:

angk - shuhs

Which of the following appeals can be considered unprofessional ? 1.logos 2.ethos 3.pathos 4.image 5. Ethics

Answers

2.ethos hope this helps.

Read this excerpt from Thomas Paine's essay "Common Sense":Mankind being originally equals in the order of creation, the equality could only be destroyed by some subsequent circumstance; the distinctions of rich, and poor, may in a great measure be accounted for, and that without having recourse to the harsh, ill-sounding names of oppression and avarice. Oppression is often the CONSEQUENCE, but seldom or never the MEANS of riches; and though avarice will preserve a man from being necessitously poor, it generally makes him too timorous to be wealthy.
But there is another and greater distinction, for which no truly natural or religious reason can be assigned, and that is, the distinction of men into KINGS and SUBJECTS. Male and female are the distinctions of nature, good and bad the distinctions of heaven; but how a race of men came into the world so exalted above the rest, and distinguished like some new species, is worth inquiring into, and whether they are the means of happiness or of misery to mankind.
What is Thomas Paine's central claim in this excerpt?
There will always be a distinction between kings and their subjects.
The equality that humans enjoyed during creation has been ruined because of war and famine.
Not all people who belonged to the upper sections of society were cruel.
The differences between the kings and the subjects were not religious or natural.

Answers

I just did the test, the answer is actually D.

D. The differences between the kings and the subjects were not religious or natural.

This is the plato answer. Have a nice day :)

I'm so disappointed that incorrect answers get approved..

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "The equality that humans enjoyed during creation has been ruined because of war and famine." Thomas Paine's central claim in this excerpt is that The equality that humans enjoyed during creation has been ruined because of war and famine.