In the 1974 case, __________, the Supreme Court ruled that even the President of the United States cannot withhold evidence from an ongoing criminal investigation. A. Bush v. Gore B. United States v. Nixon C. Kennedy v. Nixon D. United States v. Reagan

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: the answer is B. United States v. Nixon
Answer 2
Answer: In the 1974 case, "United States v. Nixon", the Supreme Court ruled that even the President of the United States cannot withhold evidence from an ongoing criminal
investigation, since the US was trying to determine if Nixon had been behind the Watergate scandal

Related Questions

In 1912 the federal reserve Sytem was astablish by the what ?
In which way did Roosevelt attempt to restore the nation's confidence in the banking system?a. Ordering banks to keep 100 percent of deposits in cash b. Firing and replacing top banking executives c. Declaring a bank holiday to give banks time to get in order d. Lowering interest rates
Please, I need the answer
Westward expansion that resulted in the destruction and removal of Native American tribes was one political and moral issue that arose after 1815. Which of the following was also a political and moral issue that arose after 1815?Question options:The growth of textile mills led to favoritism for rich southern farmers.The opportunity for profit from cotton production increased the demand for enslaved laborers.New states could not be admitted without agreeing to allow slaves to be used for farming.None of the aboveWhat banned slavery in the northern portion of the Louisiana Purchase?Question options:the Judiciary Act of 1789the Missouri Compromisethe Adams-Onis Treatythe Northwest Ordinance
Which modern-day country does not contain land that was once part of the Roman Empire?A. Denmark B. Israel C. Algeria D. Switzerland

A writ of habeas corpus is used toA. show just cause why you are being held a prisoner.
B. lock you up in jail.
C. schedule a court hearing.
D. request an appearance before a judge.

Answers

The correct answer is A) show just cause why you are being held a prisoner.

A writ of habeas corpus is used to show just cause why you are being held a prisoner.

A writ of habeas corpus helps individual freedom because it allows the accused to request a trial by jury. This way the court can confirm if its detention is lawful. The term was first used in 1215, as one of the clauses of the English Magna Carta.

the answer should be A.Habeas Corpus in english means bring the body

Hitler's power in Europe was seriously checked when the United States entered the war. TRUE. User: who led the Communist forces in Indochina and in North Vietnam.

Answers

Hitler's power was not checked when the US entered the war. The war with the US was between them and Japan. The USSR did join sides with the allies when Germany broke an treaty. However, the US did win the war between Japan.

What does Bantu means _____.
river
people
lion
tribe

Answers

Bantu refers to a certain group of Niger–Congo languages that are spoken in Central and South Africa. A few examples of Bantu are Swahili, Xhosa, and Zulu. The term Bantu can also refer toa number of ethnic groups in Africa who speak the Bantu language. The correct answer is people.
the bantu means people man

Which statement best describes how Catholic and Protestant missionaries interacted with African natives?A. They treated the natives as equals.
B. They turned a blind eye to the slave trade. <=
C. They respected African cultures and religions.
D. They saw natives as children in need of guidance.
(answered it)

Answers

The answer is letter D. Many African natives believe din God when missionaries from both Catholics and Protestants travelled to Africa in order to teach native children about God. Because of this, many African have started to believe in God when they hear the missionaries talked about God with the kids

Even though it did not appear a WMD program might be in place, what did Hussein do that increased the fears of weapons inspectors?

Answers

He didn't allow inspectors to check his facilities and institutions which inspired fear that he was producing weapons of mass destructions and biochemical weaponry even more. In the end, it turned out however that he did not have them and that the technology he owned was way way behind what was initially expected. He just hid it so he could inspire fear so people wouldn't bother him.

The thing that Hussein did regarding the programs that increased the fears of weapons inspectors was that he didn't allow the inspectors to check the facilities and institutions.

What is a program?

It should be noted that program simply means the policies that are put in place in order to achieve a particular goal.

In this case, the thing that Hussein do that increased the fears of weapons inspectors was that he didn't allow the inspectors to check the facilities and institutions.

Learn more about programs on:

brainly.com/question/26134656

#SPJ5

1. You have read the poems “Mending Wall” and “Any Human to Another.” Although the poems were written at different times in American history, they share some thematic elements. What do they have in common? State the theme of each poem in a complete sentence. Then briefly explain how they share some aspects of that theme.

Answers

The poem “Any Human to Another”  is addressed racial themes, although racial issues are not directly mentioned and the poem “Mending Wall” is about breaking the once whole world, the moral crisis of modern civilization, the tragic loss of a living, harmonic contact between humans.

That is why after reading these two works it can be concluded that they have a similar theme. The authors discuss the human condition and the issue of equality.

“Mending Wall” is about two farmers who were arguing over a wall and the writer does not seem to support the idea of the wall being created. “Any Human to Another” is a poem that stresses that humans are all connected to each other and that when one person feels oppression, the whole race of that person is greatly affected.

The Similarities are that, the two poems describe two arguing parties. In the two poems, there is division which is the wall and the discrimination.

I hope this helps, Regards.