Which amendment to the Constitution ended slavery in the United States

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The 13th amendment to the constitution which was ratified December 6th, 1865, abolished slavery in the United States.

Related Questions

A person who tries to get elected to public office
Lesson 6 unit 2 the third bank of the river 1.C2.C3.B4.A5.B6.D
Which of the following best defines a proxy war
Identify two early traditions of people in Southeast Asia.
How did prohibition contribute to the growth of organized crime?

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act provided support by

Answers

It provided temporary relief programs for the most affected by 2009 Recession and invested in infrastructure, education, health, and energy (renewable to be precise).
   

Final answer:

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act provided economic support through tax benefits, increased federal funds for education, health care, infrastructure, and energy initiatives to stimulate the U.S. economy and create jobs during the global financial crisis.

Explanation:

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), passed in 2009 during the height of the global financial crisis, was designed to stimulate the U.S. economy and save and create jobs. The ARRA provided economic support through multiple avenues including tax benefits, increased federal funds for education, health care, and infrastructure, and funding for various energy initiatives. For example, it supplemented state budgets enabling them to avoid severe cuts in education and healthcare. Also, the ARRA funded infrastructure projects for road, bridge, and building construction creating jobs and boosting the construction industry.

Learn more about American Recovery and Reinvestment Act here:

brainly.com/question/36703527

#SPJ6

Why did the Lend-Lease program anger isolationists?

Answers

Answer:

The Lend-Lease Program angered isolationists because it put an end to the neutrality of the United States and was a decisive step to leave behind its traditional policy of isolationism and nonintervention, which had dominated the foreign relations of the country before World War I and again since 1935 with the passing of the Neutrality Acts; After the war, the United States would adopt a completely different role with the constant supervision and intervention in world affairs.

It was seen as a way to undermine the Neutrality Acts.

From 1942 until the end of the war, American auto makers were not allowed to manufacture brand new cars

Answers

Yes, it is true that from 1942 until the end of the war, American auto makers were not allowed to manufacture brand new cars, since the government wanted these resources to allocated towards the war effort. 

Answer:

True

Explanation:

In 1942 The Office of Production Management announced a new order that will halt production of all non-military vehicles indefinitely, starting in February.

All cars, including commercial trucks, replacement parts and new civilian passenger vehicles are included in the rationing program.

Chairman of the War Production Board, Donald Nelson, ordered the prohibition of all production of automobiles and light trucks after Feb. 2. The order was approved by President Franklin D. Roosevelt with the intention to reorganize machinery for war production.

The ban’s initial start date was issued for Jan. 15. However, when more than 400 automobile dealers met with the House Small Business Committee to discuss the issue, Feb. 2 was selected as the new start date.

Clare Cargile, president of the National Automobile Dealers Association, said that dealers testified that the country’s defense and agriculture industries would “suffer from the restrictions.” According to Cargile, the dealers received a “very sympathetic response” from the House.

The production of stock will ensure all military demands will be met. Leon Henderson, head of the Office of Civilian Supply and of the Office of Price Administration, said new car dealer facilities will be used to store approximately 130,000 new passenger cars.

Nelson’s new order formalized a Jan. 1 announcement made by Henderson. The order barred dealers from selling new cars and introduced the freezing of automobile production.

The order applies to halting both civilian and military passenger car production. Nelson confirmed that “all foreseeable military demands” for vehicles could be met before the month’s production. He said that manufacturers who are unable to complete their production quota before Feb. 2 may request permission for additional operating time.

When the order was initially issued on Jan. 1, more than 38,000 trucks were already assembled and ready for distribution. Some manufacturers asked permission to produce vehicles without tires in order to maintain civilian stock, but were dismissed. The current order applies to all production regardless of previously established contracts. The rationing plan will materially reduce the number of cars available for civilian sale.

William Reagan, treasurer of the Chicago Automobile Trade Association, was present during the testimonies. “This committee would do well to get a true and complete picture of the automobile situation for the benefit of the motoring public, as well as for the benefit of the 44,000 car dealers in this country,” he said. “As the situation has been presented to date the 451 dealers in Cook County may be thrown out of business in 30 days.”

New vehicles will not be permitted for sale until next year at the earliest. All sales of 1942 model vehicles are prohibited, except for purchases by government agencies.

Otherwise, cars designated for sale will only be released to those certified or deemed eligible by OPA officials. Current estimates leave automobile manufacturers sitting on $175 million in unused inventory.

Automobile graveyards are also mentioned in the new order. It aims to collect older models, dating before 1935. Government officials accused graveyard operators of not cooperating and not surrendering the rusting vehicles for scrap metal.

The requisitioning law allows the government to immediately seize the vehicles and offer compensation at a later date. There are more than four million cars that would be used for scrap metal, accumulating a total of approximately three million tons.

While the rationing program continues, the restrictions have eliminated positions for about 200,000 truck and taxi drivers.

What did the vietnam war prove the state of global communism ?

Answers

The Vietnam war proved that the state of global communism was strong in winning battles with regards to alliances. It showed that if communist countries coordinated with each other, they would be a very powerful and fearful bunch of countries.

It showed that the domino theory was not correct; Laos and Cambodia converted communist later but abandoned to grow everywhere the rest of southeast Asia.

Explanation:

Vietnam, a one-party Communist state, has one of south-east Asia's fastest-growing markets and has set its scenes on growing a developed nation by 2020. It became a combined country once more in 1975 when the well-armed forces of the Communist north caught the south.

All of the following are examples of vertical organization EXCEPTA) Standard Oil's control of all phases of petroleum production and distribution.
B) the Krupp firm's integration of mines, steel mills, and munitions plants.
C) the British East India Company's monopoly on the tea trade.
D) U.S. Steel's control of mines, steel mills, and railroad manufacture.
E) All these answers are correct.

Answers

All of the following are examples of vertical organization "C) the British East India Company's monopoly on the tea trade," since vertical integration implies the acquisition of different elements of business. 

Answer:

The only example that was not a vertical organization system is:

The British East India company's monopoly on the tea trade.

Explanation:

The British East India Company was a very powerful organization that long-lasted around 250 years. It had a more horizontal type of organization because its structure gave freedom to perform decision making a all levels. It was one of its biggest flaws because the governors and directors relayed on their employees and that let them to the widespread usage of nonsupervised decision making.

HELP ASAP ILL MARK BRIANLISTSome historians point out that Woodrow Wilson's policies were not completely progressive. Why would they say this?

Answers

Woodrow Wilson claimed his place within the Progressive movement with his economic reform package, "the New Freedom." This agenda, which passed congress at the end of 1913, included tariff, banking, and labor reforms and introduced the income tax. Wilson also expanded the executive branch with the creation of the Federal Reserve, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Internal Revenue Service. His emphasis on efficiency and bureaucracy fit him squarely within the Progressive movement.