Which of the following correctly shows the underlined subject(s) and verb(s) and correctly punctuates the independent clauses?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: Please let us see the sentences first.
Answer 2
Answer:

I swear it is impossible for me to get rid of them

I am filled with them, and I will fill them in return.

I swear it is impossible for me to get rid of them;  

I am filled with them and I will fill them in return

I swear it is impossible for me to get rid of them;  

I am filled with them, and I will fill them in return.

I swear it is impossible for me to get rid of them,

I am filled with them; and I will fill them in return


Related Questions

HELP ME OUT PLEASEWhat is the AUTHOR'S PURPOSE in writing this passage? A) To inform the reader about some important facts and details about the sun B) To entertain the reader with exciting new information about the sun C) To persuade the reader to learn more about the sun D) To inform the reader about how the sun's gravity would affect people​
Who is the speaker of grateful never give up​
"The sunlight that brought life and healing to you, has brought stripes and death to me.this is an example of
Do girls like gentlemen? Just a curiosity
View the pencil drawing and contemplate Kurtz's words just before he dies. Are his words, "The horror! The horror!" appropriate as a caption for this painting? Why or why not? Explain your reasoning in one to two well-developed paragraphs. Consider what the painting reveals about Kurtz's insight into his situation and what he means, possibly in his last few moments of clarity and lucidity before he dies, with the words, "The horror! The horror!"

In the poem “beware: do not read this poem,” the speaker calls the poem “a greedy mirror” and describes the poem as having “taken in many victims.” What does this figurative language reveal about the poem and the effect the speaker expects the poem to have on the reader?

Answers

Answer:

to grab the attention of human curiosity.

Explanation:

In the poem “Beware: do not read this poem”, the speaker calls the poem “a greedy mirror” and describes the poem as having “taken in many victims” to grab the attention of human curiosity.

Strangely enough the poem begins with the story of an old women who haunts people and disappears inside the mirrors. The use of figurative language makes the poem sound grim and horrifying. The poet then changes the narrative of the poem into a more discursive speech from the fourth stanza.

From this point on, the poet warns the readers that the poem is alive and that there is no escape from it. She expects the readers to feel frightened as if they were devoured by the poem.

Final answer:

In “beware: do not read this poem,” the speaker's figurative language suggests the poem is a reflector of fears or insecurities that could profoundly impact its readers.

Explanation:

In the poem “beware: do not read this poem,” the speaker uses figurative language to create a sense of danger and intrigue about the poem itself. By calling the poem 'a greedy mirror,' the speaker implies that the poem reflects the reader's fears or insecurities in a magnified, and perhaps distressing, manner. The statement that the poem has 'taken in many victims' suggests that the speaker expects the poem to have a profound, potentially unsettling impact on its readers. This could mean that people can lose themselves in it, reflecting their fears, inadequacies, or even their own self-image.


Learn more about Figurative language in poetry here:

brainly.com/question/1554151

#SPJ3

Please help, i will mark your answer as brainlyiest if you do good TwT The Tell-Tale Heart By Edgar Allen Poe Claim: The storyteller believes that he is not crazy although he is. From the beginning, the narrator was attempting to convince the reader that he was not crazy although he was bothered over his neighbor's eye. The pace of the story-line began from the narrator admitting how he had a bad feeling whenever the old man's vulture eye looked at the narrator but didn't think that the narrator was crazy over it. Soon enough throughout the story the narrator was driven crazy over the vulture looking eye from the old man and decided to kill the old man. Although from the reader's perspective it seems to look like the narrator was crazy, the narrator did not think so. The narrator had planned very meticulously over the thought of killing to the old man and acted out on it. Once the deed was done, the police came by to check because a neighbor reported suspicious activity by the old man's home. The narrator let the police in the house search it and the narrator had explained how the old man was gone to visit a friend out in the country and the police believed him. But the narrator's guilt got to him and put him on edge. He behaved more and more suspicious and finally let a cry out of admitting to killing the man because the narrator thought the policemen were on to him. The way that the mood affected me was that the narrator had begun to admit that he was a normal person, perfectly fine. But once the narrator put out the exposition it started to give out the expression that he was crazy and him denying that he wasn't crazy made the narrator even more suspicious. To conclude my claim, I see that narrator is genuinely crazy and that even though he convinced his own self and attempted to prove the reader he wasn't crazy, in the end, he was.

Answers

In my thought the answer is Yes

Answer:

Pretty good maybe cite some evidence to make it better

Explanation:

PLZ HELP Read the excerpt from The Land. Based on this dialogue, which statement best describes Paul? Mitchell almost smiled. "Well, don't want that. Thing is, though, Paul, this here's a dangerous-looking animal." O He is an adventurer. O He is a risk-taker. "Dangerous enough for me to reconsider?" O He is a complainer. "Well, that's up to you. You the one hafta ride him." O He is a worrier. I walked up to the grey and looked into his eyes. "TII ride him," I decided right then for a fact. Tve got only my neck to lose and four times a rider's pay to gain."​

Answers

Answer:

The answer in B

Explanation:

Answer:

He is a risk-taker

Explanation:

Please mark brainliest

Have a good day :)

How is Maria Campbell's Joseph justice an act of social criticism

Answers

Answer:

History is a social criticism because it reveals how the Métis people are marginalized, when they just want to live their lives in a sustainable and honest way.

Explanation:

"Joseph justice" tells the story of Joseph, a man who does not want to harm anyone, does not want to remove Canadians, or anyone else from Canada, nor does he want to start any kind of conflict. Joseph just wants to recover his gun and furs that were caught by the Canadian army. Joseph needs his gun and furs because they are necessary for the survival of him and his family. In other words, Joseph just wants to be happy with his family, away from any problems. He tries to recover gun and furs honestly, but is subjugated and imprisoned on account of his tribe and the stigmatization that the British had against Native Americans.

This work is a strong social criticism, primarily because it shows how the native peoples were slaughtered by the imperialists when they just wanted to survive honestly.

3) This story MOST LIKELY takes placeA)
in the present day.
B)
in the near future.
C) in the distant past.
D) in the far-off future.

Answers

What is the story so I can answer?

Which of the following is Latin root?
a. age
b. aes
C. con
d. pro

Answers

Answer:

Con is a latin root word. It means in opposition to.

Hope that helps! Have a good day!

Answer:

C is the answer