The answer is A.) All citizens
It helped the United States crack Japan's naval code.
It forced Axis powers to admit defeat.
It forced the Allies to admit defeat.
Answer:
A. It reversed the trend of Japanese expansion.
Explanation:
on edge
The Battle of Midway Island was a turning point in the war in the Pacific, reversing Japanese expansion and providing the United States with a strategic advantage.
The Battle of Midway Island, which took place in June 1942 during World War II, was a major turning point in the war in the Pacific. It reversed the trend of Japanese expansion in the region, as the United States successfully repelled the Japanese fleet and inflicted significant losses on their forces.
Additionally, the battle helped the United States crack Japan's naval code, giving them a strategic advantage in future naval operations. This victory proved to be a critical blow to the Japanese and forced them to adopt a more defensive position in the war.
#SPJ6
Answer:
The two compromises established a delicate balance between the North and the South.
Explanation:
The Great Compromise of 1787, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was a political agreement during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that defined the structure of the legislature of the United States. Under the Compromise, the legislature would be divided in two chambers: the Senate, as the upper house, where every state would have equal representation, and the Congress, the lower house, where seats would be allocated to states proportionally, according to their population. The Three-Fifths Compromise, on the other hand, was the other great compromise agreed during the Constitutional Convention. According to this compromise, three out of every five slaves would be counted as part of the population of each slave state when allocating seats for the Congress.
The political significance of these two compromises was that they established a delicate balance between the North and the South. For the northern states, which were generally smaller than the southern ones, the Great Compromise meant that they would be considered as equals. For the southern states, the Three-Fifths Compromise meant that they were overrepresented. If slaves had not been counted, they'd have been a minority in Congress. However, this balance was very fragile, and the disagreements between the North and South erupted into the Civil War of 1861-65,
The Great Compromise proposed a bicameral congress to achieve political balance between small and large states, and the Three-Fifths Compromise counted three-fifths of enslaved persons for federal representation and taxation, giving extra political power to slave states. Both compromises significantly shaped the U.S. political landscape.
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise had significant political implications for the formation and structure of the United States government. The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, proposed a bicameral congress. It assuaged the fears of both small and large states by allowing for variable representation: equal representation for each state in the Senate and proportional representation in the House of Representatives, based on state population.
The Three-Fifths Compromise, on the other hand, pertained to the issue of slavery and representation. Under this compromise, three-fifths of the enslaved population would be counted when determining a state's representation in the House of Representatives and its federal tax bill. This compromise effectively gave extra political power to slave states and had a profound impact on the political balance between the North and South. However, it also entrenched racial prejudice in the Constitution by implying that enslaved people were less than fully human.
Both compromises played a crucial role in shaping the U.S. political landscape. They determined how states were represented in the federal government and managed contentious issues like slavery, ensuring the preservation of the Union.
#SPJ3
Answer:c
Explanation: