The passive sentence is
→ B. The walls of my bedroom had been painted bright pink
This sentence uses past perfect tense
✐ formula past perfect
(+) O + had + been + Verb 3 (by S)
(-) O + had + not + been + Verb 3 (by S)
(?) Had + O + been + Verb 3 (by S)?
_________________________
Subject : English
Keywords : Passive Voice, Past Perfect
Also read the similar question
brainly.com/question/9828825
B)through Haemon, when he goes against his father’s commands and tries to usurp the throne
C)through Ismene, when she tries to dissuade Antigone from burying their brother Polyneices
D)through Creon, when he tries to control matters that only the gods have the right to govern
D)through Creon, when he tries to control matters that only the gods have the right to govern.
Hubris is an extreme feeling of pride and self confidence, Creon causes his own catastrophic ending and those surrounding him by an excesive pride.
Sophocles primarily develops the element of hubris D) through Creon, when he tries to control matters that only the gods have the right to govern.
Hubris is a concept that makes reference to a personality characterized by extreme pride and arrogance, which most times also leads to a defiance or disobedience against the gods. In Antigone by Sophocles, Creon, who is the king of Thebes, is unwilling to listen to what others have to say. He goes against divine law when he forbids all the citizens to bury Polyneices. After he condemns Antigone to death for burying her brother, he refuses to listen to his own son, who tries to convince him not to kill Antigone. In that way, his pride and his arrogance not only lead to Antigone's death, but also to the deaths of his son and the queen.
to provide the details or facts
B.
to elaborate on the main idea
C.
to state the main idea
D.
to grab the reader’s interest
While writing, we are to use The purpose of a hook as a way: D. to grab the reader's interest.
In writing, a hook is a compelling opening or introductory sentence or paragraph that aims to captivate the reader's attention and draw them into the rest of the piece. It is often used at the beginning of an essay, article, or story to engage the reader and make them interested in reading further.
A well-crafted hook can take various forms, such as a provocative question, an intriguing statement, a vivid description, an anecdote, or a surprising fact. Option D is correct.
Read more on purpose of a hook here brainly.com/question/9282072
#SPJ6
B. "Cf. Hammond [p514] v. South Carolina State College, 272 F.Supp. 947 (D.C.S.C.1967) (orderly protest meeting on state college campus); Dickey v. Alabama State Board of Education, 273 F.Supp. 613 (D.C.M.D. Ala. 967) (expulsion of student editor of college newspaper)."
C. "While the absence of obscene remarks or boisterous and loud disorder perhaps justifies the Court's statement that the few armband students did not actually "disrupt" the classwork, I think the record overwhelmingly shows that the armbands did exactly what the elected school officials and principals foresaw they would."
D. "One does not need to be a prophet or the son of a prophet to know that, after the Court's holding today, some students in Iowa schools — and, indeed, in all schools — will be ready, able, and willing to defy their teachers on practically all orders.
Answer:
A. "In the absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate their speech, students are entitled to freedom of expression of their views. As Judge Gewin, speaking for the Fifth Circuit, said, school officials cannot suppress 'expressions of feelings with which they do not wish to contend.'"
Explanation:
In this excerpt, the speaker tells us that a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate speech was not found. This shows the importance of precedent. The doctrine of precedent is the idea that judges must inform their decisions by studying past judicial decisions. In this case, the fact that there was no precedent that could justify the regulation of speech means that the judges could not conclude that the regulation of speech had a legitimate constitutional basis.