Answer:
$105.60
Explanation:
Given: Total dividend paid= $1100000.
Retained earning= $3300000.
Number of outstanding shares= 725000.
PE ratio= 17.4 times.
First finding earning per share.
Formula;
⇒
⇒
∴
Hence, earning per share (EPS)= $6.07.
Now, finding the appropriate stock price.
Price of stock=
⇒ Price of stock=
∴ Price of stock=
Hence, $105.60 would be the appropriate price of stock.
Answer:
a. $36,000; $30,000
Explanation:
Consumer Surplus is the difference between price paid by the consumer & maximum price he is willing to pay. Graphically it is the triangular area above the equilibrium price, below the demand curve.
Producer Surplus is the difference between price received by the seller & his minimum selling price. Graphically it is the triangular area below the equilibrium price, above the supply curve.
So : The formula = 1/2 (price differential) (quantity)
Consumer Surplus = 1/2 (14-8)(12000) = 1/2 (6) (12000) = 1/2 (72000)
= 36000
Producer Surplus = 1/2 (8-3)(12000) = 1/2 (5) (12000) = 1/2 (60000)
= 30000
Years 11-20: 12%
Required: What is the maximum amount the Claussens should pay John Duggan for the hardware store?
Answer:
Explanation:
Calculate maximum that should pay:
Compute present value of cash flows from the store, year 1 to 5:
Annual cash flows are $70,000
Desired rate of return on investment for 1 to 5 years is 7%
Number of years is 5
Present value of cash flows generated during 1 to 5 years =
= $287,013.82
Compute present value of cash flows from the store for years 6 to 10
Annual cash flows are $70,000
Desired rate of return on investment for 6 to 10 years is 10%
Desired rate of return on investment for 1 to 5 years is 7%
Number of years is 5
Present value of cash flows generated during 6 to 10 years = annual cash flows x PVIFA (10%,5) x PVIF (7%,5)
= $70,000 x 3.79079 x 0.7130 = $189,198.33
Compute present value of cash flows from the store for years 11 o 20
Annual cash flows are $70,000
Desired rate of return on investment for 11 to 20 years is 12%
Desired rate of return on investment for 6 to 10 years is 10%
Desired rate of return on investment for 1 to 5 years is 7%
Number of years is 10
Present value of cash flows generated during 11 to 20 years = [annual cash flows x PVIFA (12%,10)] x PVIF (10%,5) x PVIF (7%,5)
= $70,000 x 5.65022 x 0.62092 x 0.7130 = $175,100.98
Calculate present value of estimated sale amount to be received for sale of store
Present value of estimted sale amount to be received = [Estimated sale amount x PVIF (12%,10)] x PVIF (10%,5) x PVIF (7%,5)
=$400,000 x 0.32197 x 0.62092 x 0.7130=
=$57,016.50
Calculate total maximum amount that should be paid
Particulars Amount ($)
Present value of cash flows during 1 to 5 years $287,013.82
Present value of cash flows during 6 to 10 years $189,198.33
Present value of cash flows during 11 to 20 years $175,100.98
Present value of estimated sale value $57,016.50
Maximum amount that C should pay to JD for store $708,329.63
Therefore, Maximum amount that should be paid $708,329.63
Answer:
As a result of the technology change, the price of pollution will be same as price of pollution with pollution permits.
The quantity of pollution with corrective tax will be lower than quantity of pollution with pollution permits.
Explanation:
The pollution permits are issued to reduce pollution by firms. The companies will reduce the pollution and will only be able to emit pollution up to certain limit. The price of pollution with corrective tax will be same as the price of pollution with pollution permits.
The change in technology will effect an increase in the price of pollution due to the increased cost of production factoring in the social cost of pollution, hence shifting the supply curve upward. The quantity of pollution will decrease as firms adopt cheaper technologies for pollution reduction influenced by the corrective tax policy and pollution permits.
The subject of your question is concerned with corrective tax policy and pollution permits in the context of a market economy under the influence of advances in technology. Under the original conditions before the social costs of pollution are taken into account, the equilibrium was met at a pollution price of $15 with a quantity of 440. However, once the external cost of pollution has been factored in, the supply curve shifts upward, creating a new equilibrium at a price of $30 and a quantity of 410, indicating an increase in the cost of pollution and a decrease in its quantity.
These policy instruments (corrective tax and pollution permits) induce companies to invest in technologies that reduce pollution higher costs of pollution as a result of the corrective tax motivate firms to seek cheaper technologies for pollution reduction. Those with less costly ways of lessening pollution will do so to reduce their tax expense, while those who would incur large costs in doing so would opt to pay the tax. The option of pollution permits introduces a marketplace where firms can purchase the right to pollute, the cost of which is again a motivator for firms to reduce pollution. Consequently, the demand for pollution permits among firms will influence their pricing. Firms that can reduce pollution at lower costs will do so the most. With no change in demand for pollution permits or corrective tax policies, the price of pollution will change as a result of the conditions set by these policies, and the quantity will change according to the adoption of more efficient technology.
#SPJ11
Answer:
$18,510.
Explanation:
Book Balance $6,100
Adjustments:
Add: Transposition Error 15,600
Less: NSF 3,100
Bank Service Charges 90
Adjusted Book Balance $18,510
Transposition Error - Company has understated its Cash Balance by recording 17,300 instead of 1,700. So, add the error to the Account.
NSF - Company has recorded a collection of receivable. But the bank termed the Check as "NSF" because of insufficient funds. So, deduct it from the Cash balance.
Deposit in-Transit and Outstanding Checks are already recorded in the Company's books of accounts. These transactions should be adjusted in the Bank Account.
Answer:
We can find the capital gains yield from the following formula:
Capital Gains Yield = Increase or decrease in the share price divided by Original cost of the shares when purchased
By putting values
Capital Gains Yield = ($52 - $36)/$52 = -30.7%
Explanation:
We can see that there is a decrease in the share price and this is also evident form the capital gains yield formula.