Joan is a single individual who works for Big Petroleum, Inc. During all of 2019, she is stationed in West Africa. She pays West African taxes of $20,000 on her Big Petroleum salary of $92,000. Her taxable income without considering her salary from Big is $36,000. How should Joan treat the salary she receives from Big Petroleum on her 2019 U.S. tax return?

Answer: The eight-firm concentration ratio in this industry is 0,7.

Explanation: The concentration ratio measures the proportion of total production produced by, in this case, the first eight largest companies in an industry. It is calculated by dividing the market share of the first eight firms in the industry by the total market share.

So: The first 8 firms sell: 3 each 12%.  The next 3 each 8%.  And thirdly 2 firms each 5%.

Then we calculate: (3x12) + (3x8) + (2x5) = 70%  These companies represent 70% of the industry's total output.

So the concentration ratio is = = 0,7

Answer:

In this situation, most of the NASA workforce would still be composed of austronauts with jet fighter experience because they would be lured by the higher wages offered to them.

However, the difference would lie in that there would also be some austronauts without jet figther experience, who would still try to get into NASA, despite being offered lower wages.

This is a different situation to the current one, where jet fighter experience is an requirement to become a NASA austronaut, which means that those without this type of experience are barred from entering NASA, no matter how low of a wage they would be willing to take.

Final answer:

Offering higher salaries to astronauts with jet fighter experience may attract more qualified candidates with these skills, as these prepare them for the extremes of space travel. Yet, this could create salary disparity and undervalue other essential astronautical skills and experience.

Explanation:

If NASA were to revise their hiring strategy and offer higher salaries to astronauts with jet fighter experience, it might increase the number of qualified applicants with this specific type of experience. Jet fighter experience and the associated G-force training in simulators is highly valuable in the space industry as it prepares individuals for the extreme forces experienced during space travel. Furthermore, adapting to zero G (free fall or weightlessness), another specific aspect of astronaut training, could be an easier transition for those with jet fighter background.

However, this kind of strategy might create a salary disparity among astronauts, potentially leading to dissatisfaction among those without jet fighter experience. It's important to remember that there are many valuable skills and experience required in space exploration, not just those gained through jet fighter training. Higher salaries based purely on jet experience might overlook other important attributes and qualifications.

Learn more about Salary strategies here:

brainly.com/question/34099403

#SPJ11

Answer:

$2069

Explanation:

Given

Applied overhead costs of Goods sold = $59,300

Applied overhead cost of finished goods = $38,000

Overhead Balance = $97,300

Overhead Cost = $92,000

Overapplied Overhead = Overhead Balance - Overhead Cost

Overapplied Overhead = $97,300 - $92,000

Overapplied Overhead = $5,300

Allocated Amount = (Applied Overhead * Finished Goods /(Overapplied Overhead)

Allocated Amount = ($5,300 * $38,000) ($59,300 + $38,000)

Allocated Amount = ($5,300 * 38,000) (97,300)

Allocated Amount = $2069

Answer:

The over applied overhead which is allocated to finished goods inventory is $ 1,488.54

Explanation:

Determination of over or under applied overhead

Applied Manufacturing overhead                                      $ 97,300      

Actual factory overhead incurred                                      $ 92,000

Overapplied manufacturing overhead                              $    5,300

Allocation of over applied overhead is on basis of values in Cost of goods sold and Finished goods inventory.

Cost of goods Sold                     $ 59,300

Finished Goods inventory          $ 38,000

Sum of COGS and Inventory      $ 97.300

Over applied Overhead      $ 5,300

Allocation Finished Goods inventory

$38,000/ $ 97,300 * $ 5,300 = $ 1,488,54

Allocation Cost of Goods sold

$ 59.300/ $ 97,300  * $ 5,300 = $ 3.811.46

Answer:

Total increase in deposit  = $54,200,000

Explanation:

given data

deposits = $20 million dollars

bank reserve = 10%

solution

we know that Deposit in bank A  is = $20,000,000

and  Reserve @ 10%   = $2,000,000

so

Bank A loans or bank B deposit  will be = $20,000,000  - $2,000,000

Bank A loans or bank B deposit  = $18,000,000

here  Reserve @ 10%  = $1,800,000

so

Bank B loans or Bank C deposit  will be here = $18,000,000  - $1,800,000

Bank B loans or Bank C deposit = $16,200,000

so that

Total increase in deposit will be = Bank A + Bank B + Bank C     ...............1

put here value we get

Total increase in deposit  = $20,000,000 + $18,000,000 + $16,200,000

Total increase in deposit  = $54,200,000

Answer: employees

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is $41.2

Explanation:

This will be solved by Dividend Discount Model which is one of the ways of valuing the price of shareholders' equity.

Here, the future value of dividend payment are discounted using the cost of equity.

Ke = D1/Po + g

Where Ke is the cost of equity

D1 is future dividend payment.

Po is the current share price or stock price

g is the growth rate.

To find the current price of stock price, we need to re write the equation;

Po = D1 ÷ (Ke - g)

D1 = Do x 1.03

= $2 x 1.03

=2.06

Ke = 8% or 0.08

g = 3% or 0.03

So we have;

2.06 ÷ (0.08 -0.03)

$2.06 ÷ 0.05

$41.2