Nietzsche, the German philosopher, is well-known by his sentence “god is dead”. This words should not be taken literally since what Nietzsche wanted to say was that he never believed in God so he (God) could have never died as he never existed, so this sentence is a metaphor. Nietzsche wanted to express that the Christian God is no longer the believable source of faith of absolute moral principles.
Nietzsche was an atheist during his adult life, so he never believed in God’s existence. Throughout his sentence, Nietzsche express not only the fact that God died, but also the fact that the human being killed him with the purpose of reaching a greater understanding of the universe. In other words, when the human being question himself, he killed God. But, for Nietzsche, the dead of God unleashes a certain crisis since society was born and established with these moral principles.
With that being said, the “overman” is understood by Nietzsche as the person who is able to create his/her own principle’s system by identifying as “good” everything that proceeds from his/her own genuine will of power. Thus, traditional principles represented by Christianism subdue the weakest people to a “slave morality”. Nietzsche thought these principles should disappear in order to find new ones that could represent his prototype of the ideal human being, “the overman”.
B) A concurring opinion asserts that two similar cases should be aligned and ruled on together, while a dissenting opinion insists that the case being heard is singular and unique.
C) A concurring opinion demands that all justices rule in the same way on a case, while a dissenting opinion explains the differing opinions of justices who ruled the same way on a case.
D) A concurring opinion explains why a justice disagrees with the majority decision, but abstains from ruling on the case, while a dissenting opinion describes the feelings of the majority.
Answer:
A)
Explanation:
The main difference between these two terms is that a concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority. Each of which tends to ocurr often in court cases where various judges analyze and pass judgment of another judges decision on a specific case. With a concurring opinion most, if not all, judges agree with the decision that has been made but tend to give different reasons as to why they believe the decision was justified.
Answer:
A: A concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority.
Explanation:
I did the quiz. here's proof:
Social welfare can be measured by adding up the utilities of people when the benefits are distributed in such a way that no person derives utility at the cost of another person.
It should be noted that social welfare systems give assistance to people through programs such as health care, unemployment compensation, food stamps, child care assistance, etc.
The government can estimate the welfare of government policy through interpersonal comparison of utility.
Learn more about welfare on:
Answer:
Social well-being can be measured by the "sum" of public services provided to people.
Explanation:
A government, as well as policy makers, that promote efficient public policies aiming at the positive social and economic promotion of its population is promoting social welfare and the degree of that social welfare can be measured by the "sum" of the public services provided.
This is because public services, when performed in efficient ways, allow for the reduction of the needs of a society. A community that has all its needs met is a society with a high degree of social well-being, which can achieve very beneficial and uplifting standards of living.
Answer:
Multilateral diplomacy not only offers better opportunities for dealing with complex tasks, it is also better able to legitimise the results achieved and thus tends to make them more sustainable, since they emerge from joint efforts.
It will do so by first discussing the definition of multilateral diplomacy and its implementation in the United Nations, followed by an in-depth analysis of what can be seen as the major unique challenges: decision making, legitimacy, representation and bureaucracy; whilst systematically working through other factors
mark me brainliesttt
Answer:
Based of off the Ten Commandments of Hinduism, some laws include:
Satya (Truth)
Ahimsa (Non-violence)
Brahmacharya (Celibacy, non-adultery)
Asteya (No desire to possess or steal)
Aparighara (Non-corrupt)
Shaucha (Cleanliness)
Santosh (Contentment)
Swadhyaya (Reading of scriptures)
Tapas (Austerity, perseverance, penance)
Ishwarpranidhan (Regular prayers)
Brainliest if i was helpful? uwu