Help.........idk..........
help.........idk.......... - 1

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

1=Osle because its lower in C than the other city

2=-12 because its below not above

3=28 because its above not below Hope this helps

Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

1=Osle because its lower in C than the other city

2=-12 because its below not above

3=28 because its above not below Hope this helps

Step-by-step explanation:


Related Questions

If the statement shown is rewritten as a conditional statement in if-then form, which best describes the conclusion? When a number is divisible by 9, the number is divisible by 3.
Can answer this 1/2 + 2/5=​
a technician charges 25$ per hour plus 50$ for a house call to repair home computers. make a table and a graph to show the cost for 1,2,3, and 4 hours of home computer repair service. is there a direct variation?
The weather report says the temperature is 20°C and will drop 5°C per hour for the next 6 hours. Daryl plans to begone for at least 6 hours, and he has a plant outside. If he wants the plant to remain in temperatures above -10°C,should Daryl move his plant to a warmer location before leaving?An inequality to model the problem isThe solution is​
Four runners are training for long races. Noah ran 5.123 miles, Andre ran 6.34 miles, Jada ran 7.1 miles, and Diego ran 8 miles.What is the total running distance of the four runners?

A damsel in distress is being

Answers

Check the picture below.


make sure your calculator is in Degree mode.

In a city known for many tech start-ups, 311 of 800 randomly selected college graduates with outstanding student loans currently owe more than $50,000. In another city known for biotech firms, 334 of 800 randomly selected college graduates with outstanding student loans currently owe more than $50,000. Perform a two-proportion hypothesis test to determine whether there is a difference in the proportions of college graduates with outstanding student loans who currently owe more than $50,000 in these two cities. Use α=0.05. Assume that the samples are random and independent. Let the first city correspond to sample 1 and the second city correspond to sample 2. For this test: H0:p1=p2; Ha:p1≠p2, which is a two-tailed test. The test results are: z≈−1.17 , p-value is approximately 0.242

Answers

Answer:

Null hypothesis:p_(1) - p_(2)=0  

Alternative hypothesis:p_(1) - p_(2) \neq 0  

z=\frac{0.389-0.418}{\sqrt{0.403(1-0.403)((1)/(800)+(1)/(800))}}=-1.182    

p_v =2*P(Z<-1.182)=0.2372  

Comparing the p value with the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we see that p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say that we don't have significant difference between the two proportions.  

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation  

X_(1)=311 represent the number college graduates with outstanding student loans currently owe more than $50,000 (tech start-ups)

X_(2)=334 represent the number college graduates with outstanding student loans currently owe more than $50,000 ( biotech firms)

n_(1)=800 sample 1

n_(2)=800 sample 2

p_(1)=(311)/(800)=0.389 represent the proportion of college graduates with outstanding student loans currently owe more than $50,000 (tech start-ups)

p_(2)=(334)/(800)=0.418 represent the proportion of college graduates with outstanding student loans currently owe more than $50,000 ( biotech firms)

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)  

p_v represent the value for the test (variable of interest)  

\alpha=0.05 significance level given

2) Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if is there is a difference in the two proportions, the system of hypothesis would be:  

Null hypothesis:p_(1) - p_(2)=0  

Alternative hypothesis:p_(1) - p_(2) \neq 0  

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:  

z=\frac{p_(1)-p_(2)}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)((1)/(n_(1))+(1)/(n_(2)))}}   (1)  

Where \hat p=(X_(1)+X_(2))/(n_(1)+n_(2))=(311+334)/(800+800)=0.403  

3) Calculate the statistic  

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:  

z=\frac{0.389-0.418}{\sqrt{0.403(1-0.403)((1)/(800)+(1)/(800))}}=-1.182    

4) Statistical decision

Since is a two sided test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(Z<-1.182)=0.2372  

Comparing the p value with the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we see that p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say that we don't have significant difference between the two proportions.  

Billy finished his history assignment in 1/4 hours. Then he completed he’s chemistry assignment in 1/3 hours. What’s the total amount of time bill spent doing these 2 assignments

Answers

Answer:

7/12 of an hour

Step-by-step explanation:

you add them, by finding the common denominator.

1/3=4/12

1/4=3/12

3/12+4/12=7/12

5% of what number is 63?

Answers

To find the percentage of a number, you take the percent - 5% - and change it to a decimal by moving the percent over 2 times to the left and multiplying it by the number. So...

.05 x 63
= 3.15

Answer: 5% of 63 is 3.15

5.3 divided by 37.63

Answers

7.1 is the correct answer
0.1408450704That is the answer.

6 is subtracted from a number. The result is divided by 4. This result is added to 10 to give 30. What is the number?A. 4
B. 80
C. 86
D. 16

Answers

Answer: 86

Explanation: I started with 30 then reversed everything so I subtracted 10, multiplied by 4, and then added 6, and got the number 86. Then I checked the answer by subtracting 6 from 86, then divided it by 4, added it to 10, and the final number equaled 30.

I hope this is the answer you were looking for! I’m so sorry if it’s wrong!