Answer:
The word is sparse
Explanation:
In 1750, the population of New France was very sparse, even if it had grown substantially since the seventeenth century, when the first colonists arrived.
The reason was the northernly location of the population centers of the colony, which were mostly in what is now Quebec. The harsh winters and difficult conditions kept many people from emigrating. Another reason is that the colony only allowed Catholics to settle there.
In 1750, New France was populated mainly by fur traders and trappers, with a limited number of farmers and soldiers. Relations with local indigenous populations were crucial for the settlers' survival. Some French Catholic priests attempted to convert indigenous populations to Christianity.
The population of New France in 1750 was primarily composed of fur trappers and traders, a limited number of farmers, and soldiers. The French had established New France as a royal colony in the mid-17th century, focusing mainly on the fur trade. Relations with the local indigenous populations, such as the Algonquian, were crucial for the survival of the French settlers, who largely saw Canada as a harsh and challenging environment. It is also important to note that there were efforts made by a limited number of French Catholic priests to convert local indigenous populations to Christianity.
The word that best describes the population of New France in 1750 is limited. France controlled immigration to Canada in order to keep the population limited to fur trappers, traders, farmers, and soldiers. The sparse French presence in New France meant that the colonists depended on the local native Algonquian people for survival.
#SPJ11
b. Being able to find inexpensive labor
c. Increased competition
d. Being influenced by other cultures
b. the Hindu Renaissance.
c. jealous hostility.
d. concern.
Answer:
c. jealous hostility.
Explanation:
Here's a more detailed explanation:
Jealous Hostility:
During the colonial era when British academics studied India, there was a notable sense of resentment and hostility among some Indians. This reaction was fueled by various factors:
1. Colonial Context: The British colonial rule over India had a significant impact on Indian society, culture, and economy. British scholars were often associated with the colonial administration, leading to skepticism and suspicion.
2. *Cultural Superiority: British scholars sometimes approached the study of India with a sense of cultural superiority. Their interpretations and portrayals of Indian culture were not always accurate or respectful, leading to offense among Indians.
3. Cultural Identity: Many Indians saw the British academic study as an intrusion into their cultural identity. They were concerned that British scholars might misrepresent or misinterpret Indian history, religion, and traditions.
4. Exploitation: There was a perception that British scholars were exploiting Indian culture and history for their own academic and political agendas, contributing to negative feelings.
5. *Loss of Autonomy: As India was under colonial rule, the study of India by outsiders was seen as an extension of the colonial dominance and control over the nation's narrative.