Help me!!!!!Please!!!

Answer: The Federalists felt that this addition wasn't necessary, because they believed that the Constitution as it stood only limited the government not the people. Both Hamilton and Madison argued that the Constitution didn't need a Bill of Rights, that it would create a "parchment barrier" that limited the rights of the people, as opposed to protecting them. The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government too much power, and without a Bill of Rights the people would be at risk of oppression. One faction opposed the Constitution because they thought stronger government threatened the sovereignty of the states. Others argued that a new centralized government would have all the characteristics of the despotism of Great Britain they had fought so hard to remove themselves from. And still others feared that the new government threatened their personal liberties.

Explanation:

Answer:

The commander in chief role deals only with the military, while the chief executive role is broader.

Explanation:

The commander in chief is the highest authority of the armed forces. In the case of the United States, a civilian, the President, is the Commander in Chief. Supposedly, this decision is meant to keep the military in check.

Chief executive is about the political branch in which the President is also the highest power. In the United States, we have 3 branches of power (The executive, judiciary, and legislature). The president is the highest authority of the executive power.

Final answer:

The president as the chief executive sets the agenda for domestic policy and appoints key officials. As the commander in chief, the president makes major military decisions and directs defense policy. There are checks and balances to limit the power in both roles.

Explanation:

The roles of the president as the chief executive and commander in chief differ in several ways. As chief executive, the president is the head of the executive branch of the federal government, and is responsible for executing and enforcing federal laws. This includes appointing key federal officials and setting the agenda for domestic policy.

On the other hand, as the commander in chief, the president is the highest-ranking official in the U.S. Armed Forces. The president has the authority to deploy troops, make significant military decisions, and develop the country's defense policies. This role often becomes more prominent during times of war or conflict.

It's important to note that while the president has significant powers in these roles, they are subject to checks and balances from the other branches of the U.S. government to prevent abuse of power.

Learn more about Presidential Roles here:

brainly.com/question/30710619

#SPJ3

Answer:

1) would it be accurate to use this analogy as a way to understand the 330 million gods of hinduism? (why or why not? )

Yes, the analogy is quite accurate. The 330 million gods in hinduism represent vastly different things, they are like the color of a rainbow, but they come from a single entity.

2) what would be another nonreligious example to illustrate the one essence yet the presence of multiple gods?

In a way, it would be like the evolution of biological species: Animals, plants, bacteria, fungi, archaea, and protista, represent the six biological kingdoms, and include very different species, however, they all have one common ancestor from which they evolved.

Answer:

Negligent hiring

Explanation:

A school hired a bus driver without conducting a multistate criminal background check; the school conducted a background check only in the state in which it is located. Subsequently, the driver was convicted of kidnapping one of the children who traveled in his bus. The prosecution in the case revealed that the driver had been convicted 10 years ago for a similar case in another state. In this scenario, the school is guilty of negligent hiring

Negligent hiring is a legal claim made against an employer which is based on the fact that the employer knew or should have known about the employee's background i.e,the employer should have known about the employee's background of violent behavior.In this scenario, the school is guilty of negligent hiring because they fail to do a proper criminal background check on potential employees and also check employment and personal references of the driver in order to validate his employment history

Answer:

The correct option is B

The resignation was accepted and the withdrawal is too late.

Explanation:

A withdrawal may only take place before the offer reaches. In this respect, it could be concluded that a withdrawal prevents an offer from becoming effective.

Since the superintendent's acceptance letter was sent before the teacher's withdrawal letter, the teacher's resignation has been accepted. The fact that the withdrawal letter has not been received by the superintendent before the teacher received the acceptance letter, the withdrawal offer is null an void. Except the superintendent officer wants to take a reconsideration.

Answer: B - The resignation was accepted and the withdrawal is too late.

Explanation: From the above question, the teachers resignation was accepted by the superintendent before the teacher decided to withdraw her resignation.

The superintendent has already received and accepted the resignation letter before she withdrew it. That was why she revived her resignation acceptance on day six after her withdrawal letter was sent in this n day five

Answer:

Option C

Explanation:

It evolved from the intermingling of various Indian traditions and beliefs.

I hope this helps