How are the expressed or enumerated powers of Congress different from the implied powers of Congress?A. The expressed or enumerated powers of Congress are those that Congress exercises publicly, while the implied powers are those that Congress exercises in private sessions attended only by its own members.


B. The expressed or enumerated powers of Congress are those that Congress is granted in the original text of the Constitution, while the implied powers are those that Congress is granted in the Bill of Rights and other amendments to the Constitution.


C. The expressed or enumerated powers of Congress are those that the federal government grants to Congress, while the implied powers are those that Congress receives from each individual state government.


D. The expressed or enumerated powers of Congress are those that are clearly stated in Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution, while the implied powers are those that are not clearly stated, but that interpretation of the Constitution grants to Congress.

The correct answer is letter B

The main characteristics of the painting are:

Perspective: figure art, in drawing or painting, the different distances and proportions between objects seen at a distance, according to the principles of mathematics and geometry;

Use of chiaroscuro: painting some areas of light and others in the shade, this game of contrasts reinforces the suggestion of volume of the bodies;

Realism: the Renaissance artist no longer sees man as a mere observer of the world that expresses the greatness of God, but as the greatest expression of God himself. And the world is thought of as a reality to be understood scientifically, and not just admired;

The use of canvas and oil paint begins;

Both painting and sculpture, which previously appeared almost exclusively as details of architectural works, become independent manifestations;

Emergence of artists with a personal style, different from the others, since the period is marked by the ideal of freedom and, consequently, by individualism.

A criticism of interest group pluralism is "its class bias in favor of those with greater financial resources".

One of the criticisms of interest group pluralism centers around imbalances that may hold on, in this way discoloring popularity based goals.  

Ideally, interest group pluralism alludes to the conflicting interest groups that work with the administration to make a social and law based parity for all. Be that as it may, interest group pluralism, as rehearsed, moves toward becoming discolored with cash and power. On the off chance that one gathering is favored among another gathering, the parity shifts. This can happen regularly with cash. On the off chance that the administration favors one gathering over another as a result of powers of cash or power, vote based system can come into inquiry. In this manner, there turns into a disparity in the portrayal of society overall. The incredible interest group can pressure the administration, and the legislature may start to settle on choices that don't support an equalization of sentiments and thoughts.

One criticism of interest group pluralism is its class bias in favor of those with greater financial resources.

This critique suggests that interest groups with more money and resources have a greater ability to shape policy outcomes, potentially marginalizing the interests of less affluent individuals or groups. Critics argue that this creates an imbalance in the democratic process, as the influence of wealth can overshadow the voices of those with limited financial means.

Another criticism is that interest group pluralism favors the interests of large states over those of small states. This concern arises from the notion that interest groups with a larger membership or more resources may have a stronger impact on policymaking, potentially leaving the concerns and needs of smaller states underrepresented.

However, it is important to note that these criticisms do not reflect the views of all individuals or scholars, and there are varying perspectives on the impact and implications of interest group pluralism in democratic societies. The nature and effects of interest group influence can vary across different contexts, and debates continue about how best to balance the representation of diverse interests within democratic system

To know more about interest  here

brainly.com/question/29451175

#SPJ6

Answer:

Yea I DEFINETLY would ;)

Answer:

Iceland has a relatively mild and steady climate despite its high altitude Because of oceanic influences such as the North Atlantic DriftThe rugged northern coast offers many good natural harbors  Icelandic rivers are mainly of two types: glacial and clear-water rivers.

Explanation:

I hope I helped you

Answer:

c. The increased number of people through whom information must pass

Explanation:

Options include "a. Reductions in morale tend to prevent employees from communicating effectively, b. The fewer number of subordinates reporting to each manager, c. Reductions in production discourage employees from sharing information, d. The increased number of people through whom information must pass, e. The smaller number of managers as compared to line workers"

The researchers give a reason that in case of tall organization, the information must pass through all the people in the hierarchy due to which there are high chances of distortion from original version. In case of flat structure, all can be communicated directly and it is more open in regard to culture.

Answer:

Increase

Explanation:

After a scientific research, carried out by both A.F Williams and K.A Lancaster, in 1995, with a title: "The prospects of daytime running lights for reducing vehicle crashes in the United States." These researchers, however, made various conclusions, one of which, amongst other things, stated that Daytime running lights INCREASE visual contrast between vehicles and their background, which enhance their noticeability and detectability.

Therefore, the correct answer is INCREASE.