The man himself can be responsible for environmental crises through human activities like pollution, deforestation, and unsustainable resource extraction.
The man himself can be held responsible for environmental crises through various human activities. Pollution, oil spills, deforestation, and unsustainable resource extraction are examples of actions that directly contribute to environmental degradation. Additionally, the choices and behaviors of individuals, such as wasteful consumption and lack of environmental awareness, also play a role in exacerbating environmental issues.
#SPJ11
Answer:
The Acts of Navigation were acts of Parliament designed to promote the self-sufficiency of the British Empire, restricting colonial trade to England and reducing dependence on imported foreign products. It was one of the most important political attitudes taken by the government of Oliver Cromwell.
Explanation:
The Acts of Navigation consisted of any commercial product being transported to European countries by sea must be made by a vessel belonging to England or the country of origin of the exported product. The reason for creating this law was mainly to eliminate competition. What happened was that the Netherlands was achieving a high level in maritime trade thanks to the use of its vessels to be brought and brought supplies from the New World. The Dutch naval power was so great that it could reach anywhere on the entire planet, and of course with that gained much clearly recognized profit in the capital of the Netherlands named Amsterdam, which was often represented as the capital of finance and not to mention that the Netherlands was the largest power in the world.
Answer:
Option D
Explanation:
Strict scrutiny is a decision usually imposed on a law established by the government, some will say it is a time when the judiciary disagrees or questions the government on a particular decision.its usually place by the judiciary to determine the constitutional decision of a particular law.
We see the kind of decision from the judiciary when someone sues the government on a particular case.
b. We can never observe the cause and effect at the same time.
c. We can never observe a necessary connection between events.
d. We can never observe the atoms that make up the cause and the effect of events.
Answer:
c. We can never observe a necessary connection between events.
Explanation:
According to Hume, he argues that we can never conceive any necessary connection between the events of cause and effect. This is as a result that there is no other impression to which our idea may likely be traced.
So, according to Hume, he believes that when we have an experience of one event that it likey leads to assume an "unobserved" cause.
Answer:
c. We can never observe a necessary connection between events.
Explanation:
Hume argues that assumptions of cause and effect between two events are not necessarily real or true. It is possible to deny causal connections without contradiction because causal connections are assumptions not subject to reason.
We cannot justify our assumptions about the future based on past experience unless there is a law that the future will always resemble the past. No such law exists. We can deny the relationship without contradiction and we cannot justify it with experience. Therefore, we have no rational support for believing in causation. Hume suggests that our assumptions are based on habit, not reason, and that, ultimately, our assumptions about matters of fact are based in probability.