Answer:
He wrote letters indicating that New England might secede from the U.S. and join the British Empire
Explanation:
just took the quiz
Answer:
c
Explanation:
he wrote letters indicating that New England might secede from the U.S. and join the British empire just took this quiz
The correct answer is True.
It is true that a production possibilities frontier represents the different choices or trade-offs a society faces.
In an economy, a production possibilities frontier or PPF is a transformation curve where economist can identify the máximum number of possibilities of two goods when resources are fixed. This serves a Company that has limited resources to make a decision on two things. The graphic shows a curve; one good in the “x” axis and the other one is in the “y” axis.
Answer:the answer is A
Explanation:
The Songhaye mpire replaced the Mali empire.
Further explanations:
The Mali Empire was among the most relevant kingdom of West Africa established by Sundiata Keita and is believed to have existed somewhat around 1200 CE. Though in the beginning the Kingdom started as a small faction but was soon able to expand its territories to the areas of the Niger River. The early history of the empire is not clearly stated but the empire was able to flourish itself through the trans- Saharan trade route during the 14th century having trade with both national and international kingdoms.
During 1460’s civil war broke in the kingdom because of the trade routes construction. It weakened the administration of the Kingdom and opened the door for the foreign invaders. The demise of the Mali Empire became the reason for the strengthening of the Songhai Empire. They captured the territories of the Mali Empire and established themselves as one of the largest empires of its era.
Learn more
Answer Details
Grade: High school
Subject: US History
Chapter: Mali Empire
Keywords:
Mali Empire, West Africa, Sundiata Keita, Niger River, trans- Saharan, trade route, national, international,kingdoms, foreign, invaders,
Songhai Empire,
b. A microhistorian might interview only members of a specific subgroup of unemployed people, while a comparative historian might count all the unemployed people in a single city during one year of the Great Depression.
c. A microhistorian might document one day in a town that experienced particularly high unemployment levels, while a comparative historian might graph unemployment levels in several cities throughout the Great Depression.
d. A microhistorian might count all the unemployed people in a single city during one year of the Great Depression, while a comparative historian might interview only members of a specific subgroup of unemployed people.