True or False
Answer:
false
Explanation:
Answer:
false I believe...............
What is he known for?
We took a picture next to the bronze sculpture Charging Bull."
B.
We took a picture next to the bronze sculpture Charging Bull.
C.
We took a picture next to the bronze sculpture Charging Bull.
D.
We took a picture next to the bronze sculpture "Charging Bull."
Mrs. Coates
B.
Rosal Simpson
C.
Bud Searcy
D.
Lisbeth Searcy
BUD SEARCY WAS THE ONE WHO TOLD TRAVIS TO WATCH OUT FOR THE HYDROPHOBIA
My opinion:
I honestly think that teenagers should be charged the same as adults. I think this, based on how teens are today compared to back then. Nowadays teens are "used to" or "know" what gang life is and think things like going to jail is a joke or makes them tough. I believe an important factor in determining a juvenile offenders punishment should be whether or not they had a motive towards their action.
The teenage brain significantly differs from an adult's, particularly in judgment and impulse control. Whether teens should be charged as adults for crimes is a complex issue, dependent on crime severity, legal history, and age. Generally, there's consensus for more rehabilitative, rather than punitive methods for teenage offenders, due to their higher potential for change.
The teenage brain is indeed different from the fully mature adult brain. Numerous studies in neurobiology have shown that teenage brains are in a constant state of development and are particularly susceptible to influences from their environment. More specifically, the frontal lobe, the area of the brain responsible for judgment and impulse control, is one of the last areas to mature.
While it's true that teenagers' brains operate differently from adults, it is a complex issue on whether they should be charged as adults for their actions. Factors like the serious nature and severity of the crime, a teenager's previous history with the law, and their age at the time of the offense should be considered when deciding punishment. A balance must be struck between understanding the inherent differences in brain development and holding individuals accountable for their actions.
However, many argue that because the teenage brain hasn't yet fully developed, it is unfair to treat teenagers with the same punitive measures as adults. Instead, many advocate for more rehabilitative methods that take into account a teenager's potential for change and growth.
#SPJ2
her family's homeland that she has never seen is the meaning of the allusion unglimpsed phantom Faridpur.
The writer of the essay, was born in Indian . The excerpt reflects her present feelings. Now, she is living in the U.S and she thinks she has been able to settle down. However, she sees herself as part of her family's homeland. She wants to write about immigrants and inform the American readers about them. As regards the allusion, she refers to the town,Faridpur, as the place where her father was born. The writer was educated in Calcutta in a walled -off school; the school was run by Irish nuns. As Bharati Mukherjee could not grow up in Faridpur, today is in Bangladesh, she felt the town as a ghost -phantom- . In fact, she was brought up to emmigrate. She was kept away from her Indian hometown.
These options are wrong:
-the ghost of her homeland calling her back. In fact, the writer does not want to get back to India. She has found her way in America. Her hometown and Manhattan have merged.
-her vivid memory of where she was born . The writer could not live in her hometwon. She was shut up in an Irish school.
-another town near Manhattan. Faridpur is in Bangladesh, India.
I think the answer is her family's homeland that she has never seen