Why do justices use precedents in majority opinions and dissents?A. To show that other cases with similar circumstances came to a similar decision
B. To review the main points that were originally presented in the case
C. To familiarize themselves with cases that had opposite outcomes
D. To emphasize the importance of the judicial process in making a

The correct answer is A.

A precedent is a legal case that establishes what is called "principle or rule." This principle is used by the court when deciding later cases with similar issues or facts. This is because the Courts in the U.S. legal system wish to have consistent rulings in similar cases.

By relying on precedents, justices ensure consistency, predictability, and fairness in legal decisions, upholding the credibility of the judicial process. Here option A is correct.

Justices use precedents in majority opinions and dissents primarily to demonstrate that other cases with comparable circumstances have arrived at similar legal conclusions.

This practice is fundamental to the common lawsystem, which relies on the principle of stare decisis, meaning "to stand by things decided." By referencing prior cases, justices establish consistency and stability in legal interpretations.

It provides a framework for predicting how the law will be applied in similar situations. This approach also respects the principle of fairness and equality before the law, as it ensures that similar cases are treated similarly.  Here option A is correct.

To learn more about justices

brainly.com/question/25756666

#SPJ6