Member countries of the Paris Agreement are required to monitor their greenhouse gas emission and there are indeed different requirements per nation.
Nations that are members of the Paris Agreement, will monitor the greenhouse gases that they emit and try to implement methods that will reduce these emissions.
As developed countries contribute more to emissions, they are required to reduce more emissions.
Find out more on the Paris Agreement at brainly.com/question/7484470.
#SPJ2
Answer:
Member countries were required to monitor greenhouse gases and actively try to reduce them. yes, they are different requirements for more developed countries as they contributed to a lot of it.
Explanation:
The correct option is A
A river is a natural stream of water that flows with continuity. It has a certain flow, is rarely constant throughout the year, and flows into the sea, into a lake or into another river, in which case it is called a tributary. The final part of a river is its mouth. Sometimes they end up in desert areas where their water is lost by infiltration and evaporation due to the intense temperatures.
Rivers are the most practical way to establish borders, due to their natural character, their stability over time, difficulty of franqueability and the division they geographically make, with regions on one side or the other of their course. Although the rivers are used as border lines, they do not culturally separate the peoples, since through different elements, they maintain constant communication that allows a fluid interaction.
Answer:
The first pharmaceutical book, the Tang Materia Medica.
Explanation:
B. They allowed hate groups such as the Ku Klux Klan to terrorize blacks.
C. They refused to establish schools for blacks.
D. They allowed blacks to vote and hold political office.
I personaly think it's D. But I don't know.
They refused to established schools for blacks , C
I hope that's help !
Answer:
The correct options are:
Explanation:
According to the economic theory in vogue, we live in a society of freedom of investment, where the imagination and commitment of individuals in the founding of companies can be realized; here, it is said, personal initiative is not restricted, as it does in centrally planned economies, in which the state controls and limits capital. Thus, the strategists of the current model, based on the neoliberal doctrine, assume that ordinary men take the economy in their hands, freely, according to their abilities and inventiveness. Adam Smith in his Wealth of Nations advocates individual investment against monopolies such as the East India Company, which controlled England's trade with its Asian colonies. In revolutionary France, the ascending bourgeoisie that freed itself from feudal oppression, consecrated in the famous law Le Chapelier, 1791, free citizenship as an inalienable right of citizens. With time, this principle incarnated in many cases in the youthful stage of capitalism; in it it was possible. For example, in the United States with the small businessmen who arrived at the 13 colonies, or entrepreneurs who prospered as ranchers in the lands they obtained almost as gifts in the center and west, or exploiting gold veins in California. But that time is over! This idyllic world of opportunities for all, an illusion of many, democratic and inclusive and that attracts the imagination, is increasingly chimerical.
Corporations in U.S. history had advantages over small businesses in access to capital, risk diversification, economies of scale, and limited liability.
In the context of U.S. history, corporations held several advantages over small businesses. Firstly, they had greater access to capital, enabling them to invest in advanced technology, larger staff, and broader marketing efforts. Another advantage was their ability to diversify risk. By operating in different geographic areas and business sectors, corporations mitigated the risk of financial losses. They also had larger economies of scale, which meant they could buy and produce goods more cheaply and efficiently as a result of their size. In the event of financial difficulty, corporations had a critical advantage of 'limited liability,' where investors were only liable for their investment amount, protecting personal assets from corporate financial failure.
#SPJ6