Which of the following is an example of the evils of totalitarian government in Nazi Germany? A.
military factories


B.
concentration camps


C.
prisons


D.
free speech

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Concentration camps are an example of the evils of totalitarian government in Nazi Germany. The correct option is b.

What are the Nazi concentration camps?

From 1933 to 1945, Nazi Germany operated more than a thousand concentration camps on its territory and in parts of German-occupied Europe.

The first camps were established in March 1933 immediately after Adolf Hitler became Chancellor of Germany. Following the 1934 purge of the SA, the concentration camps were run exclusively by the SS via the Concentration Camps Inspectorate and later the SS Main Economic and Administrative Office. Initially, most prisoners were members of the Communist Party of Germany, but as time went on different groups were arrested, including "habitual criminals", "asocials", and Jews. After the beginning of World War II, people from German-occupied Europe were imprisoned in concentration camps.

More than 1,000 concentration camps were established during the history of Nazi Germany and around 1.65 million people were registered prisoners in the camps at one point.

Learn more about camps, here:

brainly.com/question/15943629

#SPJ3

Answer 2
Answer: B. Concentration Camps
The Nazi Party was notorious for their use of Concentration Camps in their extermination of the Jews.

Related Questions

As odd as it sounds, what was just as valuable as gold in the Songhay Empire was it salt, copper, rice, or water?
Should the United States have signed the treaty and thus joined the League of Nations? Explain
What was the main accomplishment of the Manhattan Project during World War II? the discovery of the uses of radar the mobilization of the labor force the passage of the Selective Service Act the development of the atomic bomb
which statement best describes why king Arthur is a heroic figure in morte D'arthur by sir thomas malory?
What was the basis of Lee Yick's appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court after his conviction for running an illegal laundry in San Francisco? A. Fire marshals had not inspected his laundry before declaring that he was operating in an unsafe manner. B. The requirement that laundries be housed in brick buildings was an unfair burden on Chinese immigrants. C. The local sheriff had arrested Chinese laundry owners but not white laundry owners who committed the same offense. D. At his trial, he had not been permitted to

What are the 3 types of nationalist movements

Answers

There's more than 3 ;)

1. Romantic Nationalism
2. 
Ethnic Nationalism
3. 
Cultural Nationalism
4. State Nationalism 
5. 
Religious Nationalism
6. 
Diasporic Nationalism

What did Florence Kelley and W.E.B. DuBois have in common?a. Both fought for child labor reform.
b. Both worked for improved wages for workers.
c. Both believed in racial equality.
d. Both pressured politicians to accept collective bargaining

Answers

Florence Kelley and W.E.B. DuBois both believed in racial equality. They are both famous for their social and political reformations in the mid to late 1800's.

Both believed in racial equality

From what general areas did the new immigration come

Answers

The new inagration came from the Southern to Eastern Europe. Hope this helped you. 

Where did Abraham come from; where was his home that he left to go to Canaan?

Answers

Answer:

According to the biblical book of Genesis, Abraham left Ur, in Mesopotamia, because God called him to found a new nation in an undesignated land that he later learned was Canaan. He obeyed unquestioningly the commands of God, from whom he received repeated promises and a covenant that his “seed” would inherit the land.

Final answer:

Abraham, a significant figure in Judaic, Christian, and Islamic traditions, was believed to have come from the city of Ur in Mesopotamia. According to the Hebrew Bible, he leaves Ur for Canaan at the age of 75. These accounts are primarily based on biblical sources and subject to scholarly debate regarding its historical authenticity.

Explanation:

Abraham, a central figure in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, is believed to have originated from the Mesopotamian city of Ur, based on writings in the Hebrew Bible. Although there is limited archaeological evidence to confirm this, the Bible details his migration from Ur to Canaan in the eastern Mediterranean when he was 75 years old. Throughout the centuries, in oral and later written form, Abraham is narrated to have left his home city to Canaan, marking a pivotal moment in the history of the Hebrews.

Abraham is noted as a patriarch and recognized for his unwavering commitment to worship one God. His legacy is traced to his children, grandchildren, and beyond, shaping the foundation of Hebrew lineage according to the biblical accounts. It is important to note that all the information about Abraham's origin and journey is primarily derived from scriptural sources, and there is an ongoing scholarly debate about the factual basis of these accounts.

Learn more about Abraham here:

brainly.com/question/18268914

#SPJ11

By what rate do the spanish monarchs claim the americas as their own territory

Answers

The Spanish monarchy claimed the Americas as their own through the doctrine of "terra nullius," which means "land belonging to no one." They believed that they had the right to claim the land based on their discovery and exploration. This claim was supported by the Pope through the issuance of papal bulls, such as the Treaty of Tordesillas in 1494, which divided the newly discovered lands between Spain and Portugal. The Spanish monarchy asserted their control over the Americas through colonization, establishing settlements, and exploiting the resources of the region.

Which best summarizes the Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education?Public school choice was no longer legal.

Separate but equal schools were inherently unequal and unconstitutional.

School curriculum must include information on the civil rights movement.

The principle of separate but equal schools was acceptable

Answers

The correct answer is: "Separate but equal schools were inherently unequal and unconstitutional".

Brown v. Board of Education was a case dicussed by the US Supreme Court, which  led to the enactment of a landmark decision  in 1954.  

The case was about the constitutionality of the "separate but equal" principle that was accepted in a former decision enacted by the US Supreme Court in 1896 in the Plessy v. Ferguson case. Such decision allowed the proliferation of segregated schools under the belief that, if facilities were equal in quality, such education system was not violating the equality of rights provision that had been guaranteed for all US citizens by the Reconstruction Amendments to the US Constitution.  

Brown v. Board of Education overturned the abovementioned previous Supreme Court decision and declared segregation unconstitutional, claming that, in practice, it actually deprived black students. The court published a deadline and all public schools nationwide had to abolish such practice and to adopt racial integration.