Answer:
The correct answer to the question lies in the fact that vegetarians, and most vegan trends, do not eat any product in which animal meat, produce that is meant to feed young animals (like milk), and products in which animal labor has been used, can be consumed.
Because all these are principles and values on which the vegan and vegetarian lifestyles are based, then the moral question becomes if the product to be consumed may have any of these conditions in it, or not. From here, will they be able to tell if eating something specific is morally right or not. And because there are so many different vegetarian and vegan ideologies that vary on minute details, the moral question really comes down to if the consumption of such an item violates one of their principles.
Since essentially an animal cracker is made out of parts of animals, like bone remains, since the vegan principle is not to consume anything that comes from an animal´s body, then, it would not be morally right to consume that cracker. However, if the cracker is a simple one, with no animal body parts involved, and it is simple wheat, or another grain, then it would be morally right.
Answer:
To help others change their attitudes, you can change the conditions that precede the inappropriate behavior or Change the consequences that follow the behavior
Explanation:
To help others in changing their attitude, we need to understand how we can help others change their attitude.
Helping others change their attitudes can really go a long way to change the persons behavior. There are two known powerful tools that can help you in shaping people in the direction intended for them. It includes:
1. The Change of the conditions that precede the behavior.
2. The Change the consequences that follow the behavior.
By Changing of the conditions, we actually mean that if you want a person to change their attitudes, you therefore note down the behaviors that shows the poor attitudes and then change or alter the conditions that comes before the behavior. While the Change the consequences simply means that alternative way to help a person change their attitudes is to change or alter what happens after they have shown or displayed the behavior you are trying to alter. In this case, when an experience is followed or accompanied by positive consequences, the person in question would likely repeat the behavior but when it is followed by negative consequences, the person is very likely to stop the behavior.
Conclusively, we can therefore say that to help others change their attitudes, you can change the conditions that precede the inappropriate behavior or Change the consequences that follow the behavior.
You can learn more about attitudes from:
b. focus more on individuals and their specific circumstances
c. have a stronger emphasis on sameness and wish to make people more similar
d. understand that many crimes are related to drug and alcohol addiction
Answer:
B. Focus more on individuals and their specific circumstances
Explanation:
Organic solidarity is a theory developed by Emile Durkheim which explains that it is the individual efforts of people that lead to a thriving society. Individuals, although different with their peculiarities contribute to growth through a network of interdependence.
Mechanical solidarity on the other hand attributes social cohesion to the sameness of individuals. Organic solidarity employs restitutive sanctions, while Mechanical solidarity employs repressive sanctions.
Organic solidarity, found in complex, modern societies, emphasizes the specifics of individual circumstances when it comes to social sanctions. They lean more toward rehabilitative social sanctions, with the aim for integrating individuals back into society.
The concept of organic solidarity and mechanical solidarity comes from the sociologist Émile Durkheim who used these terms to explain different types of societies. Organic solidarity is characteristic of modern, complex societies where people are interconnected through a web of different roles and professions. Such societies tend to have a greater emphasis on individuals and their specific circumstances, which informs their approach to social sanctions. Rehabilitative social sanctions are more common, as these societies understand that a punishment system needs to take into account the individual's unique circumstances, not just the act itself. These societies are generally interested in rehabilitating individuals and reintegrating them into society rather than simply punishing them.
#SPJ3
Answer:
Explanation:
White collar crimes are a problem due to their significant financial, societal and institutional consequences. Reducing these crimes requires stronger regulations, stricter penalties and resource-infused legal systems.
White collar crimes, broadly defined as non-violent crimes committed by individuals or organizations in business environments, are indeed a problem in society. The main reason for this is that white collar crimes often involve deception, fraud, or breach of trust and can result in significant financial loss for individuals, companies, and even countries. Moreover, these crimes can have wider societal impacts, eroding trust in institutions and causing social harm.
In terms of what can be done to reduce white collar crimes, several strategies can be effective. First, there needs to be stronger and more detailed regulation of business and financial practices to prevent fraudulent activities. Second, enforcing stricter penalties for those convicted of white collar crimes can act as a deterrent. Finally, there is a need to invest more in law enforcement agencies and legal systems to ensure they have the resources to detect and prosecute these crimes effectively.
#SPJ3
Malcolm X
Rosa Parks
Thurgood Marshall
The Malcolm X was a civil rights leader who believed that change should come "by any means necessary. Thus option (B) is correct.
The term leader is someone who inspires passion and motivation in followers. A leader is someone with a vision and the path to realizing as we see there are different types of leaders who are there as we see in.
As in the civil rights movement, Malcolm x is a leader as well, He supported black nationalism. He was always protecting black Americans from white Americans. As there are any means necessary is there in it, There would the stances are there which often put him at odds.
Therefore, The right option (B) is correct.
Learn more about leaders here:
#SPJ6
Answer:
Malcolm X
Explanation:
He said this on June 28, 1964
In Stanley Milgram’s obedience research, the person playing the part of the “learner” was an accomplice, or Confederate of the experiment.
Conclusively, we can say that in Stanley Milgram’s obedience research, the person playing the part of the “learner” was an accomplice, or Confederate of the experiment.
Learn more from:
In Milgram's experiment, the 'learner' was actually a confederate, or an accomplice. The 'learner' was secretly part of the research team and helped to manipulate conditions to study obedience to authority. Confederates acted as if they were receiving shocks to convince real participants they were causing harm.
In Stanley Milgram's obedience research, the person playing the part of the "learner" was an accomplice, or a confederate, of the experiment. He was aware of the true purpose of the research, never received shocks, and was acting according to Milgram's instructions.
Milgram's research was to test obedience to authority, inspired in part by Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann's defense of "just following orders." The experiment demonstrated that many people would inflict perceived harm on others if instructed by an authority figure. Confederates, who were a part of the research team, pretended to be participants and helped manipulate the research conditions.
The term confederate in this context refers to a person who is informed about the experiment and works for the researcher, manipulating social situations as part of the research design. In this experiment, the confederates would act as if they were receiving shocks when given incorrect answers, further convincing the true participants of the illusion.
#SPJ11
research has suggested that emotions: are felt less intensely by members of eastern than western cultures.
The legacy of social norms, ethical ideals, conventional traditions, religious systems, political systems, artefacts, and technologies of the Western world is known as Western culture, often referred to as Westerncivilisation, Occidental culture, or Western society. The phrase refers to nations and civilizations outside of Europe whose history have endured significant contact with Europeans through immigration, colonisation, or impact. Greco-Roman, Germanic, and Christian cultures have the most profound effects on Western culture.
Greek culture's dissemination throughout the Hellenistic world of the eastern Mediterranean resulted in a synthesis of Greek and Near Eastern cultures, significant advancements in literature, engineering, and science, and provided the foundation for the growth of early Christianity and the Greek New Testament.
learn more about western cultures here
#SPJ4