Local government can use home rule in Georgia to changeA. federal laws.
B. state laws.
C. tax laws.
D. local laws

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Local government can use home rule in Georgia to change local laws. Option D is correct.

The state government of Georgia, as well as the federal government of the United States, is made up of three branches, such as an executive, legislative, and judicial. Furthermore, Georgia's separation of powers existed prior to the federal government's. The Georgian Law on Self Government defines a municipality as a settlement.

Answer 2
Answer: b state taxs hope ium right

Related Questions

Denied powers are those powers not given by the Constitution to .... A. the state or federal government. B. the Supreme Court. C. the executive branch. D. the legislative branch.
What is the first recorded declaration of human rights?
What hardships did the south face after the civil war????
QuestionDrag each tile to the correct definition.Tilesclosed primaryopen primarygeneral electioncaucusa system for choosing a party nominee in which any registered voter may participatea meeting of members of a political party to select candidatesa system for choosing a party nominee in which only party members may participateelection for an open office
Based on this chart, which of the following statements is true

In the 1840s the main argument and Congress over the transcontinental railroad concerned

Answers

In the 1840s the main argument and Congress over the transcontinental railroad concerned the impact it would have on individual towns, since the railroad caused a major disturbance in many of the towns it passed through. 

In the 1840s the main argument and Congress over the transcontinental railroad concerned the way it could impact individual  small towns and villages. The problem was that the railroad created many problems and unnecessary noise and rush in many of the towns it passed through. 

The Articles of Confederation-America's first attempt at a Constitution-was an absolute failure.
What is the function of the dashes in this sentence?

Answers

Answer:

The function of the dashes in this sentence is to seperate the thought, to almost act as parentheses. The dashes help seperate the bit of information which describes or clarifies the previous noun.

Who authorized a bombing campaign against Cambodia, resulting in increased opposition to the war in Vietnam?Lyndon B. Johnson

John F. Kennedy

Richard Nixon

Henry Kissinger

Answers

Richard Nixon, authorized a bombing campaign against Cambodia, resulting in increased opposition to the war in Vietnam. Thus, option (c) is correct.

Nixon's decision to launch the Cambodian campaign was shown on television, sparking a wave of antiwar protests that erupted into a national crisis when four students were shot at a demonstration at Kent State University in Ohio.

Nixon had been covertly bombing Cambodia since the middle of March 1969, expanding a Johnson-initiated operation that had begun in 1965, but this fact was unknown to the public. Nixon gave the go-ahead for an American military "incursion" into Cambodia, ironically escalating the country's involvement in the long-stagnant war there while also aiming to end it.

Therefore, option (c) is correct.

Learn more about on Richard Nixon, here:

brainly.com/question/199427

#SPJ2

President Lyndon B. Johnson was the president for most of the Vietnam war and was the one who authorized the bombing on Cambodia.

on what basis- area, population, or wealth- was the number of representatives in the house determined?

Answers

It is determined on Population.

If germany were to be attacked, which two countries would have defended her?

Answers

Answer:

Italy and Austria-Hungary

Explanation:

If Germany were to be attacked  Italy and Austria-Hungary would have defended her. Italy under the dictatorship of Mussolini supported Germany because of the treatment it received in the WWI in the hands of the Allied where they did not get what they had been promised. As for the Austria- Hungary, it was taken by Germany under the leadership of Hitler to break the treaty of Versailles.

probably italy and japan

Which was not an issue that divided the delegates to the Constitutional Convention? A. how to count slaves for representation B. the continuation of the slave trade C. representation for small and large states D. the need for a federal government with more power

Answers

Answer:

D. The need for a federal government with more power

Explanation:

The other options were very debated during the Constitutional Convention. Although the empowerment of the federal government was also debated, it was a general feeling after the events that happened with the Articles of Confederation that showed the lack of power that the central government had.

So, the need for a strong federal government was not an issue that divided the delegates of the Constitutional Convention.

I hope this answer helps you.

How to count slaves for representation, the continuation of the slave trade, and representation for small and large states (A,B,C) were all issues that divided the delegates. The issue of a need for a federal government with more power was also an issue that was debated, however, it was generally agreed that a new document was needed and therefore a federal government with more power was needed.