The Virginia plan called for a blank or system of courts to interpret the law.

Answers

Answer 1

Answer:

The Virginia plan called for a judicial branch , or system of courts to interpret the law.

Answer 2

Answer: The Virginia plan called for a Judicial Branch

Related Questions

The Gupta Empire resisted invasions by these people for a long time
In order not to slow down the economic recovery associated with the war effort, President Roosevelt and Congress decided to finance the war effort almost entirely by war bond drives without increasing income taxes.A) TRUE B) FALSE
On what date did the u.s declare war on germany?
What purpose did temples serve in ancient Egypt?
Which of the following is an example of government land management? a. the clean air act b. iso 14001 c. environmental management systems d. capitalism and consumer decisions

Which monarch ruled England when settlers arrived in Jamestown and Plymouth?

Answers

James the first (James I)

Answer is King James I

What happened in 1853 that showed Japan the importance of industrial power?

Answers

Germany bombed Japan

Which explains how merchants such as Levi Strauss became wealthy during the California Gold Rush? A.
Miners had no paper money so they used gold nuggets to pay for goods.

B.
Merchants ran their stores at night and panned for gold during the day.

C.
Government taxes and regulations forced competitors out of business.

D.
Demand for items in short supply allowed merchants to charge high prices.

Answers

Demand for items in short supply allowed merchants to charge high prices and this explains how merchants such as Levi Strauss became wealthy during California Gold Rush. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the last option or option "D". I hope this explanation helps you.

The correct answer is D. Demands for items in short supply allowed merchants to change high prices. Have a great day:)

Were the Alien and Sedition Acts constitutional or unconstitutional? Did they follow the meaning of the Constitution or did they violate it in some way? Be prepared to cite the Constitution in your response.Second, what would happen if the individual states chose to nullify these acts or any others? What would it mean for the country?
Lastly, should the United States institute some form of the Alien and Sedition Acts in today's post 9/11 world? Explain your answer and by the events surrounding the Alien and Sedition Acts to today.

Answers

The Alien and Sedition Acts were four bills passed by the Congress and signed by president John Adams in 1798. These bills made it harder for an immigrant to become a citizen, they allowed the president to imprison and deport non-citizens who were deemed dangerous or were from a hostile nation and criminalized making false statements that were critical of the federal government.

Critics of these acts argued that they were an attempt to suppress voters who disagreed with the Federalist Party and that they violated the right of freedom of speech in the First Amendment.

If any individual states chose to nullify these acts, it would be consider a serious sign of rebellion. This was almost the case, with the Kentucky and Virginia resolutions.

The United States should not implement these laws as their immigration system is already extremely strict. It is very unlikely that severe threats to security are being caused by immigrants, and if they were, the US already has significant power to deal with them. All of this makes new laws unnecessary.

The Alien and Sedition Acts were unconstitutional as it limited free speech, which is guaranteed in the first Amendment. If the individual states chose to nullify the acts, that would be a sign of rebellion. I do not think that the US should institute forms of the Alien and Sedition Act. It's America. The people here should be free to say what they want to say.

What are facts and opinions with president kenndy's campaign commercial

Answers

Answer:

The election of 1960 brought to the forefront a generation of politicians born in the twentieth century, pitting the 47-year-old Republican vice president Richard M. Nixon against the 43-year-old Democratic challenger John F. Kennedy. Kennedy's chief rival for the nomination was Hubert H. Humphrey from Minnesota, whose steadfast liberalism played well with many in the Midwest.

Explanation:

Question 14 of 20Which of the following describes a similarity between the Magna Carta and
the U.S. Constitution?
O
A. Both documents establish a constitutional monarchy.
B. Both documents moved away from placing all government power
in one role or institution.
C. Both documents are based on Enlightenment principles.
D. Both documents were created to replace governments that were
not powerful enough.