John owned an apartment and leased it to Steve. The lease agreement was for one year. After ten months, Steve told John that he was moving out of the apartment immediately. When John went to the apartment, he saw that Steve had put holes in the walls, ruined the carpets, and damaged the wiring. John was told that repairs would take at least two months. John sued Steve for damage to the apartment and for the rent payments for the last two months of the lease. Steve argues that the remaining rent owed should be offset by John's duty to find another tenant and mitigate his damages. The court would most likely rule in favor of(a) Steve, because John had a duty to mitigate his damages(b) John, because Steve argued against his recovery in their dispute(c) Steve, because John could have rented the apartment "as is"(d) John, because the apartment could not be rented for two months due to the damage

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

d. John, because the apartment could not be rented for two months due to damage.

Explanation:

The main parts of a lease agreement, is the leasea term, whis generally is 1 year, and in case an early termination exist, it should let the owner know with time. Then the deposit should be specified as a security for damages or unpaid bills. In case the deposit existed then the court eill rule in favoir of Steve.


Related Questions

The first and most widely publicized caucus today is held in the state of
A restaurant is ordinarily responsible for both the items and their unseen contents once a bailment has been established. a. Trueb. false
I will give the BRAINIEST Is it enough to be suspected of terrorism , or should these suspects have the right to a fair trial before being detained indefinitely?​
There arecolors used to produce seven different types of traffic signs,a) 7b) 8c) 9d) 10
Hamedah fled from an abusive relationship to her cousin's home at age 21 and says she regrets her decision to run errands for her cousin related to crack cocaine. Which goal of punishment presumes that citizens will choose not to commit a crime because they have observed the punishments that criminals have received, and they will conclude that the costs of crime

DNA evidence is typically easy to find at a crime scene.
True
False

Answers

DNA evidence is useful in solving crimes but it is not easy to find at crime scenes so this is false.

Why isn't DNA evidence more widely used?

Even though DNA evidence can help solve a crime faster, it is not very easy to find at crime scenes.

This is because not all can give the relevant material required for DNA testing, and there is also the issue of contamination.

Find out more on DNA evidence at brainly.com/question/17677132.

#SPJ2

Answer:

false

Explanation:

James Keller was an employee at Radical Boards, Inc Radical Boards is a surf and skateboard shop that also sells clothing. While employed there, Radical Board's principal shareholder discovered that Keller had created peep holes in the shop's dressing rooms. When confronted with the peep holes, Keller denied ever using them and indicated that they were there to prevent shoplifting. The shop manager was told to fire Keller. Shortly after Keller left, a 16-year-old and her mother filed suit because the teen learned, through conversations with Keller, that he had seen her in the dressing room while she was trying on swimming suits. Keller was able to describe her not-generally-seen birthmarks to her. Keller has applied for a position at a summer camp for girls, ages 14-18. The camp director had called Radical Board's manager and asked for a reference on Keller. A) Radical Board has no liability if it simply verifies Keller's employment there. B) Radical Board has liability for its failure to prosecute Keller. C) Radical Board has no liability for the actions of employees beyond their job description. D) Radical Board enjoys a privilege against defamation if it discloses the peep hole story. E)None of the above

Answers

Answer:

E. None of the above

Explanation:

Some employers think companies can only release dates of employment, salary and some other facts, but that is not the case. There are no federal laws restricting what an employer can or can´t say about former employees. Some states may have laws about what can legally disclose.  

So in this case Keller was fired so Radical Board can tell the Camp Manager what happened and that he was fired, and if he wants to he can also tell them about the suit against him.

Puzzle: Murder caseSolve this Murder case.....






Near Mangalore, a man was found murdred on 2-10-2013 wednesday afternon at 12:35 p.m. in his house...... His wife called police at 3:23 p.m..

Police questioned everyone..

Wife: I was sleeping..

son: i went for movies with my gf

Neighbours: We went 4 the marriage..

Driver: I went to atm withdraw cash..

Cook: I went to Wine shop to buy Wine..

gardener: i was in garden the whole time. i didnt hear anythng
.
Watch Man: I went to My relative's Marriage..

Police arrested the murderer immediately..♿▫

Who was it? ❓❔

"Reply with correct reason"
Ans !?❓

Answers

Answer:

it's the wife because if it was anyone else she would've heard them and called the police alot earlier

it’s most likely the wife, since if she knew that her husband died, then she would’ve called the police sooner. Or at least I think so....

I need help please.

Answers

Your objective: Provide the definition of each branch, and explain each of there roles

- The Law enforcement branch is responsible for enforcing laws. Law enforcement prevents people from breaking the law.

-The judicial branch is in charge of explaining the meaning of laws. They look at laws and see how can one apply them in a real life situation. They also check if the law breaks the Constitution.

-The correction branch is the criminal justices system. It is in charge of dealing with individuals that have broken the law. They also make sure that the individual sentence is carried out.

The fourteenth amendment is what

Answers

Answer:

The fourteenth amendment allows for anyone born in the US to be granted citizenship. It also guarantees protection.

Explanation:

The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1868, granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States—including former slaves—and guaranteed all citizens “equal protection of the laws.”

Grounds upon which the registrar can lawfully refuse to register a partnership in ghana

Answers

Answer:

Five grounds upon which the registrar can lawfully refuse to register a partnership in Ghana, include;

(a) the partnership is not one that can be registered under the Incorporated Private Partnerships Act, 1962 (ACT 152) ;

(b) the business which the partnership intends to practice or is presently practicing is unlawful;

(c) the name of the firm does not accurately represent it or is distasteful;

(d) any of the partners is a child or mentally unstable or a person who, in the last five  years, has been found guilty of a crime or illegal activity, whether convicted or not, in connection with any trade or business.

(e) the document filled by the partners is incomplete, not readable, inaccurate, irregular, or on paper insufficiently durable to  be suitable for registration.

Explanation:

The INCORPORATED PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS ACT, 1962 (ACT 152), which has undergone a series of amendments provides the rules with which Private partnerships can be duly registered in Ghana. The registrar according to the act is the Registrar-General or any other recognized assistant. The Partnership consist of two or more persons, who intend to run a business together.

For the registrar not to lawfully register the business, it means that the business might have one of the following faults;

  • it does not meet up to the criteria of a partnership.
  • it is illegal.
  • it has a name which does not accurately represent it or is misleading.
  • any of the participants is not psychologically fit to carry out the business.
  • the documentation is faulty.