The first and most widely publicized caucus today is held in the state of

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

The first and most widely publicized caucus today is held in the state of LOWA.

Explanation:

The Caucus means a meeting of political party members to decide candidates who will lead the election campaign. If you want to know where the caucus meeting is held you need to visit that states government website. For example, Lowa which is the midwestern united state had recent caucus about the election.

In presidential elections, primary election and caucuses held important role. Both are for electing the nominee for elections. But causes meeting will decide the nominee who will lead the government campaign for the party.


Related Questions

What are the main duties of the Financial services regulation in health
Which rights are protected by the Washington Declaration of Rights? Check all that apply.the right to privacythe right to employmentthe rights of victims of crimesthe right to Internet accessthe rights of children
Most courts: A) follow the requirements for promissory estoppel set forth in the "Restatement (Second) of Contracts" because the "Restatement" is the law. B) follow the requirements for promissory estoppel set forth in the "Restatement (Second) of Contracts" despite the fact that the "Restatement" does not carry the force of law. C) do not follow the requirements for promissory estoppel set forth in the "Restatement (Second) of Contracts" despite the fact that the "Restatement" carries the force of law. D) none of the above.
Why did anti-communist legislators view hollywood as a major concern?
Many state statutes authorize use of deadly force to prevent commission of a felony.​

Is the United state ready for a woman president?.

Answers

Answer:

Honestly, due to the fact that women don't usually get voted for presidentacy and people don't think women can be presidents, no because they wouldn't let that happen.

Explanation:

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

because women can do anything and make the world a better place.

One day, police officers were involved in a high-speed chase through city limits after a driver sped through a school zone. When they finally caught up with the driver, the police immediately arrested Betty at the scene. Because Betty was arrested at the scene and without a warrant, the court may hold a hearing during the first appearance to determine whether there was probable cause to arrest her. This hearing is known as:

a. Richardson hearing
b. Allen hearing
c. Lewis hearing
d. Gerstein hearing

Answers

Answer:

d. Gerstein hearing

Explanation:

  • Gerstein hearing is a process of hearing in which a court may summon an individual over criminal charges based on probable cause. The procedure of charging an individual with a criminal suit through a reasonable belief that the arrested individual is a potential criminal is called probable cause.
  • An individual may be summoned by a court for a Gerstein hearing even without a warrant to determine whether there was a probable cause to arrest his/her.

An individual is arrested for stealing mail from a UnitedStates Post Office located in the city of Orlando, Florida.
Which court would have original jurisdiction in this case?
Orlando City Court
Orange County Trial Court
United States District Court
Florida District Court of Appeals

Answers

Answer:

I think its United states district court

Explanation:

Answer:

United States District Court

Explanation:

I think it would be the United States District Court because this is the US mail we're talking about. If this was like a local UPS, FedEx, or Amazon truck it would probably be something different.

How has the supreme court’s original interpretation of the right to privacy changed because of griswold and roe?

Answers

Answer:

Hi im Sergeant von im here too help!!.The Supreme Court's original interpretation of the right to privacy has changed because of Griswold and Roe by increasing and expanding the right to privacy. After the landmark cases Griswold and Roe, privacy then included the right to control one's own body and family and home life. Hope this answer helps.

Answer: This was the sample response

The Supreme Court has increased or expanded the right to privacy. Originally, the right applied to the privacy of one's own thoughts and the freedom to be left alone. After the landmark cases Griswold and Roe, privacy then included the right to control one's own body and family and home life.

Explanation:

Which of the following is an example of self-incrimination? Select all that apply.

A. An elderly woman who had been arrested for fraudulently writing checks on a closed bank account had initially asserted her right to remain silent, but she later blurted out that she’d been part of a criminal enterprise after two detectives indicated she would be facing life in prison unless she confessed immediately.

B. The primary suspect in a hit-and-run collision was asked by investigators to prove she wasn’t at the scene of the accident or face being charged with obstruction of justice. When threatened, she replied, “Okay, I was there at that time, but I don’t think I hit anything.”

C. Two teenagers arrested for breaking into a house for sale confirmed that they had walked by the house several times and were curious about what had been left inside after the owners moved away, but they had never satisfied their curiosity.

D. A suspect in an auto theft said that he had had always feared being accused of stealing a car after a detective told him he looked like a car thief.

Answers

Answer:

B C & D

Explanation:

All of the suspects told the officers evidence that pointed mostly at them for the culprit but didn't confess

Answer:

A-  The primary suspect in a hit-and-run collision was asked by investigators to prove she wasn’t at the scene of the accident or face being charged with obstruction of justice. When threatened, she replied, “Okay, I was there at that time, but I don’t think I hit anything.”

D- An elderly woman who had been arrested for fraudulently writing checks on a closed bank account had initially asserted her right to remain silent, but she later blurted out that she’d been part of a criminal enterprise after two detectives indicated she would be facing life in prison unless she confessed immediately.

What are the benefits and drawbacks of selecting judges through popular elections? Can a judge who considers herself or himself a Republican or a Democrat render fair and impartial justice?

Answers

I believe it is irresponsible to elect anyone by a popular vote. To ensure that it is fair and has not been slashed or meddled with, they should employ the electoral college.

Why are judges appointed and not elected by the people?

All Justices hold their positions for life and are chosen by the President, who also proposes them to the Senate for confirmation. Justices are regarded as being shielded from political pressure while making decisions because they are not required to run for re-election or engage in re-election campaigns. Unless they retire, pass away, are impeached and found guilty by Congress, or resign themselves, justices may continue to serve.

The majority of the cases the Court hears are appealed, and because the Court is the last legal arbitrator of federal law issues in the United States, its rulings are final and cannot be appealed to any other body. The Court may, however, take into account appeals from the top state courts or from federal appellate courts. Notwithstanding the fact that every legal issue may be appealed to the Supreme Court.

Learn more about judges here:

brainly.com/question/1030749

#SPJ2

Answer:

I think that electing anyone through popular vote is not smart. They should use the electoral college to make sure it's unbaised and not hacked or medled in.

Explanation: