Most courts: A) follow the requirements for promissory estoppel set forth in the "Restatement (Second) of Contracts" because the "Restatement" is the law. B) follow the requirements for promissory estoppel set forth in the "Restatement (Second) of Contracts" despite the fact that the "Restatement" does not carry the force of law. C) do not follow the requirements for promissory estoppel set forth in the "Restatement (Second) of Contracts" despite the fact that the "Restatement" carries the force of law. D) none of the above.

Answers

Answer 1

Answer:

Answer:

Explanation:

The Restatement(Second) of Contracts is a general principles of contract common law.

Promissory Estoppel is a legal principle in contract law that stops a person on breaking the promise.

Courts forr promissory Estoppel mentioned in Restatement(Second) of Contracts because "Restatement" is the law and is frequently referred to.

Related Questions

Difference between first degree murder and second degree murder
News coverage that is manipulated (managed) by a campaign manager or political consultant to gain media exposure for a political candidate.
Jamie wanted to find out if the majority of people in Texas favored the death penalty. So, he surveyed 25 students in his criminal justice class and found that 85% of them strongly supported the death penalty. Jamie therefore concluded that Texans strongly support the death penalty. Which of the following is trueJamie's conclusion is not strongly supported based on her research
Victim assistance and victim compensation programs are well established in many jurisdictions, but are they enough to compensate victims for their losses?
You have stopped for a train at a railroad crossing that is marked with a Crossbuck sign. When the train has passed, A: You should wait until the departing train is at least 500 feet from the crossing before proceeding. B: You must not proceed until you are sure there are no other trains approaching on any of the tracks. C: You can proceed as soon as the departing train has cleared the crossing.

James Keller was an employee at Radical Boards, Inc Radical Boards is a surf and skateboard shop that also sells clothing. While employed there, Radical Board's principal shareholder discovered that Keller had created peep holes in the shop's dressing rooms. When confronted with the peep holes, Keller denied ever using them and indicated that they were there to prevent shoplifting. The shop manager was told to fire Keller. Shortly after Keller left, a 16-year-old and her mother filed suit because the teen learned, through conversations with Keller, that he had seen her in the dressing room while she was trying on swimming suits. Keller was able to describe her not-generally-seen birthmarks to her. Keller has applied for a position at a summer camp for girls, ages 14-18. The camp director had called Radical Board's manager and asked for a reference on Keller. A) Radical Board has no liability if it simply verifies Keller's employment there. B) Radical Board has liability for its failure to prosecute Keller. C) Radical Board has no liability for the actions of employees beyond their job description. D) Radical Board enjoys a privilege against defamation if it discloses the peep hole story. E)None of the above

Answers

Answer:

E. None of the above

Explanation:

Some employers think companies can only release dates of employment, salary and some other facts, but that is not the case. There are no federal laws restricting what an employer can or can´t say about former employees. Some states may have laws about what can legally disclose.

So in this case Keller was fired so Radical Board can tell the Camp Manager what happened and that he was fired, and if he wants to he can also tell them about the suit against him.

Your own thoughts about criminal justice system?

Answers

Answer:

The justice system does not respond to most crime because so much crime is not discovered or reported to the police. Law enforcement agencies learn about crime from the reports of victims or other citizens, from discovery by a police officer in the field, from informants, or from investigative and intelligence work.

Explanation:

Demitri has noticed a friend of his talking to his girlfriend He can be very jealous. One day he decides to teach this friend a lesson. Demitri takes his baseball hat and hits the boy on the head. The boy falls to the ground and Demitri continues to hit him. Upon the realization that the boy is falling in and out of consciousness he calls 911 because he had no intention to cause such severe injury. If he faces criminal charges for beating his friend will he be able to successfully use the defense of abandonment?

Answers

No, the charge would be aggravated Assult because it was with a weapon his attorney could try to use temporary insanity but there’s a high chance that wouldn’t succeed

Does mr.spock give character evidence

Answers

Where does mr Spock play in?

There arecolors used to produce seven different types of traffic signs,
a) 7
b) 8
c) 9
d) 10

Answers

The correct statement will be that there are seven different types of colors used to denote the different types of traffic signs. So, the correct option that matches the statement above is A.

The seven different colors used are the colors which are primary in nature as they are considered to be the brightest colors and help the drivers and people on roads to identify the traffic conditions.

The main three colors used for denoting the traffic signals are Red, Yellow and Green where Green signs to commute, Yellow denotes to turn on the ignition and the red denotes to stop at the signal.

However there are four other colors out of the colors of the rainbow that are used for denoting different signals of the traffics. The other four colors being Violet, Indigo, Blue and Orange.

The reason that these colors are used to denote the traffic signs is because these colors travel the farthest and enable the drivers to identify the traffic sign from a further distance.

Hence, the correct option is A that there are seven different colors used to denote the different types of traffic signs.

To know more about traffic signs, click the link below.

brainly.com/question/4729352

Answer:a 7

Explanation:

Dr. Jones has a client who is of a different culture and faith. He is not comfortable dealing with this patient due to past negative feelings from childhood. What are his ethical and legal obligations? Why are these legal and ethical obligations in place?

Answers

Dr. Jones has both ethical and legal obligations when it comes to treating patients from different cultures and faiths. From an ethical standpoint, it is his duty to provide quality care to all patients, regardless of their background, and to respect their beliefs and values. He must ensure that his personal biases do not interfere with the care he provides.

From a legal perspective, Dr. Jones must adhere to laws that prohibit discrimination based on race, religion, and culture. It is also essential for him to comply with patient privacy laws, ensuring that the patient's personal and medical information remains confidential.

These legal and ethical obligations are in place to ensure that all patients receive fair and equitable treatment regardless of their cultural or religious background. Discrimination can lead to substandard care and can have a negative impact on the patient's physical and emotional health. Therefore, it is essential for healthcare professionals to understand and respect the diverse backgrounds of their patients to provide them with the best possible care.

To know more about cultures click this link-

brainly.com/question/30447976

#SPJ11

Other Questions

Against utilitarianism, which of the following authors would object, “To maximize utility by imposing burdens on some individuals is to treat all of society like a single person. But society is not like a single person, and so utilitarianism is mistaken.

After a long illness, your uncle dies. He leaves a sizeable estate but no will is found for several weeks. Finally, one of his ex-wives appears with a document she claims to be a valid will. It shows her and her children by him receiving most of his property. Your parents and the deceased's other children contest the will. Should the federal or state courts handle this case? Why? Which court in which system is most likely to hear it?

What comes before the Articles of the Constitution?

9. What ultimately happened to Clarence Earl Gideon?