Which of the following describes the most important effect the tank had on World War I? The tank ended the use of trench warfare.
The tank caused the war to last longer by killing so many soldiers.
The tank proved to be ineffective against the bombs and guns of the Central Powers.
The tank increased use of trench warfare in World War II.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

The statement that describes the most important effect the tank had on World War I is that "The tank ended the use of trench warfare". Thus, option (A) is correct.

What was World War I ?

World War I is the conflict between the principal nations of the world, which is also referred to as Great War. The War began in 1914 after the assassination of Austria king and the war lasted till 1918. It was the War between Allies and central powers.

The first World War was won by the Allies consisting of the United Kingdom, France, United States, Japan, Italy.

This war made the use of the various technologies as well as the equipment. One of the important tools were the tanks. The tank's most significant impact on World War I was that it "put an end to trench warfare."

Therefore, it can be concluded that option (A) is correct.

Learn more about World War I here:

brainly.com/question/1449762

#SPJ2

Answer 2
Answer:

Answer: The tank ended the use of trench warfare.


The most important effect the tank had on World War I was that the use of these tanks ended the use of trench warfare.

One of the most important threat of these trench to the soldiers was disease.


Related Questions

What was so special about the 1940 presidential election?
Hammurabis code of laws un dynasty legalism are similar in that both promoted the idea that.. What?
What peace agreement between Egypt and Israel was a foreign policy highlight of the Carter administration?a. The Helsinki Accords c. The Camp David Accords b. The Jerusalem Compact d. The Cairo Accords
In what way did british leaders misunderstand the revolutionary war
Why were slaves that rebelled killed and beaten?

Which statement best describes the focus on abortion opponents today?

Answers

Answer: C They work both to restrict and to outlaw abortions.

Explanation:

Final answer:

Abortion opponents today focus on the rights of the unborn and endeavor to restrict or outlaw abortion through state legislation. They have been particularly successful in conservative states, where there is a marked increase in laws limiting abortion access or imposing outright bans with punitive measures. Their alignment with the Republican Party often brings expectations of reversing Roe v. Wade, though some are dissatisfied with the party's progress on this issue.

Explanation:

Today, the focus of abortion opponents largely emphasizes the protection of the rights of the unborn, which they believe are equal to the rights of the mother. To further their cause, they have historically targeted national legislation but have now turned their efforts successfully to state legislatures. After the shift in strategy, there has been a significant increase in the number of states implementing laws that place restrictions on abortions, requiring parental involvement in a minor's decision, allowing health-care providers to refuse performing abortions, and prohibiting the use of public funds for abortions.

Anti-abortion advocates describe the fetus as an unborn child and argue that personhood rights begin at conception. Moreover, these opponents have been staunch supporters of Republican governance, hoping for the reversal of Roe v. Wade. Their backing of Republican candidates comes with the expectation of legislative action to restrict or ban abortion, although some feel the party has not moved effectively enough on this front.

Consequently, many state laws have been enacted, especially in conservative regions, that maintain the legality of abortion but limit access to abortion services, which significantly affects poor women's ability to obtain safe and legal abortions. Also, very conservative states have moved to outright bans on abortion, with some establishing criminal penalties for those who undergo the procedure, undercutting a woman's right to choose and affecting her life prospects and citizenship rights such as voting.

Learn more about Abortion Opponents here:

brainly.com/question/8978357

#SPJ3

What is the basis of the name of Latin America? The spoken languages are based on Latin. The conquerors were from Latin. Most of the settlers were from Latin. Most of the people spoke Latin.

Answers

The languages that are spoken there were based on Latin (E.g. Spanish). This means they can be considered romantic or Latin languages.

Republicanism is similar to the idea of representative democracy because both (3 points describe forms of government where people vote on all choices refer to people electing leaders to make government decisions mean a form of government where the executive is supreme explain why people choose not to participate in government

Answers

The answer that best fits the blank provided above is the second option. We can say that democracy and republicanism are similar in the idea that both refer to people electing leaders and these people are trusted to make government decisions. 

What Spanish conquistador conquered the Incas a) Juan Ponce de Leon
b) Hernando Cortee
c) Hernado de Soto
d) Francisco Pizarro

Answers

Francisco Pizarro conquered the incas

Answer:

D Francisco Pizarro

Explanation:

Juan pence de Leon wasn’t in that group. Cortés conquered the Aztecs and Hernado de Soda explored the mississp River. therefo it must be Pizzaro

Let's start with an example from history. Listed below are a series of claims regarding United States President John F. Kennedy (1917-1963). Classify each statement according to whether or not it is falsifiable

Answers

Answer:

Statement 1 and 2 are falsifiable while that of statement 3 to 6 are not falsifiable.

Explanation:

As the statements are not given, the statements to be classified are as below

  1. - Kennedy was the 35th president of the United States
  2. - Kennedy died from a bullet in his brain
  3. - Kennedy's death was the will of God
  4. - The murder of John F. Kennedy was an act of evil
  5. - If he'd lived, Kennedy would have ended the Vietnam War
  6. - Kennedy's murder was orchestrated by an undetectable shadow government of the United States

First two statements are Falsifiable as the reasons are below

As for these two statements there are counter facts/cross checking facts from which the truthfulness of the statements can be identified. For the 1st statement, the historic facts can be used and for the 2nd statement, the medical records for the death of  Kennedy can be used to test the claim

However for the statements 3 to 6 ,the statements are consider not falsifiable as there is no appropriate counter checking to define the truthfulness of these statements.

Why did Tecumseh try to unify the Native tribes of North America?A. He felt it was their destiny.
B. He was tired of all the violence in the Indiana Territory.
C. He wanted to set up a powerful trading network to revival that of the Americans.
D. He knew that if the tribes remained divided they would eventually be conquered by the Americans.

Answers

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "D. He knew that if the tribes remained divided they would eventually be conquered by the Americans." Tecumseh try to unify the Native tribes of North America because D. He knew that if the tribes remained divided they would eventually be conquered by the Americans.