A high life expectancy and literacy rate are signs that a country’s economy is __________.A.

developed
B.

developing
C.

underdeveloped
D.

undeveloped

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

The correct answer is A. A high life expectancy and literacy rate are signs that a country’s economy is developed.

Explanation:

A developed country, in general, is a country that has a high standard of living (high human development). One of the most used indicators to consider a country as "developed" is the human development index (HDI). This index takes into account wealth, education and health.

Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

A. THE ANSWER IS DEVELOPED

Explanation:


Related Questions

What religion makes its way from India along the Silk Road to china?
Which is a major reason that Central Asia has been conquered repeatedly?
Süleyman was an Ottoman emperor who created a code of laws for his empire. A. True B. False
In the early 19c, which section of the country tended to oppose tariffs?:A the South. B New England. C the West. D the Middle Atlantic.
The Indian national congress was founded in 1885 to

Need ASAP!!! Make sure to respond in short essay format, fully answer what is being asked and use complete sentences.If you were advising Gov. Henry Markham of California in 1891, Would you have recommended that he sign or vetoed the ballot reform bill? What was the strongest arguments for and against the bill? Were there any better alternatives that you could have recommended?

Answers

Answer:

Explanation: Tis is all the information you will need have a nice day.

There were several arguments for and against the bill, and it's important to consider all perspectives before making a recommendation.

Arguments for signing the ballot reform bill:

1. Increased transparency: Supporters argued that the bill would promote transparency in the voting process by ensuring that ballots were counted accurately and efficiently.

2. Reduced fraud: The bill aimed to minimize fraudulent voting practices, such as ballot stuffing and voter impersonation, by implementing stricter regulations and safeguards.

3. Equal representation: Advocates believed that the bill would help ensure fair representation by preventing any manipulation of the voting system that could favor specific candidates or parties.

4. Public confidence: Signing the bill could help restore public trust in the electoral process, as voters would have greater confidence that their votes would be counted accurately.

Arguments against signing the ballot reform bill:

1. Restrictive measures: Critics argued that the bill could impose overly strict requirements on voters, potentially disenfranchising certain individuals, particularly those from marginalized communities.

2. Increased bureaucracy: Some opponents believed that implementing the bill's provisions could lead to increased bureaucratic processes, potentially making it more difficult for voters to participate in elections.

3. Costly implementation: The bill's opponents raised concerns about the potential financial burden of implementing the proposed reforms, including the need for additional staff and resources.

4. Unintended consequences: Critics suggested that the bill's provisions might inadvertently lead to new forms of fraud or manipulation, undermining the intended purpose of the reform.

Regarding alternative recommendations, there could have been several options depending on the specific concerns and priorities of Gov. Markham. For example, he could have proposed amendments to address the potential drawbacks of the ballot reform bill or explored alternative reform measures that aimed to improve the electoral process in different ways.

In conclusion, whether Gov. Markham should sign or veto the ballot reform bill would depend on his assessment of the arguments for and against the bill, as well as any alternative solutions that may have been available. It is essential to thoroughly evaluate the potential impact and trade-offs of any decision related to electoral reform.

Populists believed that bankers, landowners, and political parties

Answers

They believed that these institutions only serve the interests of the wealthy.  The movement was born out of the frustrations of the farmers who wanted reforms and their interests promoted.  They believed that by forming this party that they could achieve those goals.

Answer:

worked together to keep control of the US in the hands of the wealthy.

Explanation:

What term references a period of economic growth as measured by a rise in gdp

Answers

The term that references a period of economic growth as measured by a rise in GDP is an economic expansion. It is the increase in economic activity.

The men we call patriots would have been called traitors if England had won the war.Question 13 options:
a. True
b. False

Answers

A) that answer is true

true



I took the test so I know its true



The NAACP and the UNIA focused on African American communities in different places, even other countries. How did the focus of the NAACP'S efforts differ from the focus of the UNIA'S ?

Answers

The NAACP is a civil rights organization which was found in 1909 with the purpose of advancing justice for all African Americans.

The UNIA is a fraternal movement founded by Jamaican Marcus Garvey under the purpose of the advancement of all people of African descendant around the world.

With time, UNIA lost influence, as their leader, Marcus Garvey, was deported from the United States in 1927. On the other hand, the NAACP evolved as an organization who worked for the advancement of not only people of African descent but also other minority groups, as well as women.  

Obviously NAACP was looking for freedom but UNIA wanted to take over.

Because travel was safe and Rome built good roads, Christians were enabled to spread the gospel more easily.True
False
True is my answer.... Is this correct?

Answers

In general, yes, it is true that because travel was safe and Rome built good roads, Christians were enabled to spread the gospel more easily, since this allowed for a drop in crime, robbery, and death.