How might “Moctezuma II” have been different if the author chose to write the story of Moctezuma’s imprisonment as a poem?

Moctezuma II had been a sonnet, there would have not been as much detail in the example, and the sonnet would have been long and off-kilter, and elements of the story would have become mixed up in the organization.

What is the central idea of the poem?

In the event that it would have been a sonnet rather than a story, such a lot of enumerating of the example could not have possibly been conceivable and the length of the sonnet would have been extremely lengthy.

If rather than a story, the writer would have composed the detainment of Moctezuma II as a sonnet, it wouldn't had been a decent sonnet in light of the fact that the specific explanation of the detainment of the ruler was not exceptionally clear so it would have been an obstacle for choosing the subject of the sonnet.

Besides, the specifying that are conceivable in the story doesn't become conceivable in the sonnet a few times in light of the fact that the words and the rhyming plan makes it somewhat hard to teach everything in the sonnet which is conceivable in the story.

Concluding the subject of the sonnet would have been troublesome on the grounds that the explanation of detainment was not exceptionally clear.

For more information about Moctezuma II, refer the following link:

brainly.com/question/25938709

#SPJ6

Answer:

If "Moctezuma II" had been a poem, there would have not been as much detail in the lesson, and the poem would have been long and awkward, and features of the story would have gotten lost in the format.

Explanation: