What did the Know-Nothing Party support?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

Explanation:

was primarily an anti-Catholic, anti-immigration, and xenophobic movement, originally starting as a secret society. The Know Nothing movement also briefly emerged as a major political party in the form of the American Party


Related Questions

Which statement best describes a benefit of civic participation? It caters to people who have time and money to volunteer. It is often presented as an elective course in high school. It connects individuals with the larger community. It is only beneficial to society when citizens are well-informed. It often requires resources and additional fundraising
Which of the following terms best describes the use of environmentally friendly farming methods to conserve soil and water?a. slash-and-burn farming b. sustainable agriculture c. conservation d. ecology
The bilingual education act of 1974 provided: A) that all children should learn a second language B) funds to meet the language needs of non-English speaking students C) that each public school have at least one bilingual teacher D) none of the above
A person whose opinion is important enough to affect one's self-concept strongly is a _______________.
With regard to the Electoral College is it believed to be the most democratic way to elect the president and vice president, encouraging states to give responsibility for elections to the federal government?

It is always possible to identify all the causes of a problem completely. T or F

Answers

No, this statement is false

I can think of two specific situations in which all the causes are not possible to identify:

1) some information is lost (e.g. your program doesn't compile but you lost  your documentation )
2) the problem is too complex and it would take a long time (days, weeks) to identify all the causes.

Answer:

true

Explanation:

Which of the following statements is true of Singapore?A. Singapore is a major manufacturer of computer hard drives.
B. Singapore is member of the Federation of Malaysia.
C. Singapore's government condemned U.S. military actions in Afghanistan.
D. Singapore finally became self-governing

Answers

Singapore finally became self-governing, indicating that Singapore achieved independence and established its own governance system. Therefore, option D is correct.

Self-governing refers to the state or condition of having the ability to govern oneself autonomously, without external control or dependence on another governing entity.

It signifies that a region or entity has achieved a level of political independence and has the authority to make decisions and establish laws that govern its own affairs.

Self-governing entities have the power to determine their own internal policies, institutions, and systems of governance, allowing them to shape their own destiny and exercise autonomy in their socio-political and economic spheres.

Self-governing status typically entails a level of sovereignty and self-determination within a defined geographic area.

Therefore, option D is correct.

Learn more about self-governing here:

brainly.com/question/14934383

#SPJ6

Answer:

B.

Explanation:

Singapore is a member of the federation of Malaysia.

Does media reflect on south African democracy society or article 16 of South African bill of right

Answers

No, media is not reflected in the Article 16 of New South African's Bill of Right. The Article is more on the constitutional limitations. The Media is reflected instead in Article 4 of the Bill. The Article 4 is entitled "Freedom of Speech, Assembly, and information".

Section 1 states "there shall be freedom of thought, speech, expression and opinion, including a free press, which shall report and comment fairly and respect the right to reply."

Clarifying the issues of a problem is the _____ step in the problem-solving process.first
second
sixth
seventh

Answers

Clarifying the issues of a problem is the second step in the problem-solving process Option(b) is correct.

What is a Problem Solving process?

Problem solving is the way by which arrangements are created to eliminate a snag from accomplishing an extreme objective.

Problems needing arrangements range from essential private matters of "how would I turn on this machine to additional mind boggling subjects in the business and scholastic fields. Obstructions are not handily taken out when there is an absence of vital assets or information to accomplish the objective.

Miniature and large scale problems emerge continually and in this manner, problem solving is a crucial piece of life. Not every person can take care of a problem all alone. Attorneys, specialists, and experts are instances of those that assume the job of being problem solvers. Numerous organizations have been very effective by perceiving a problem and making an answer. The more individuals that are burdened by a problem, the more noteworthy the chance to foster an answer.

Therefore Option(b) is correct.

Learn more about Problem Solving here:

brainly.com/question/3418829

#SPJ5

second problem solving is the right answer.

How is an appeals court different then a traditional federal court?a.
There are three justices in an appeals court.

b.
There are no options after the appeals court.

c.
There are three justices in a traditional federal court.

d.
There are more chances to be heard at an appeals court.

Answers

Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson s writings in Feiner v. New York conclude that freedom of speech must be protected at all costs, including a breach of the peace. True or False

Answers

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Irving Feiner was a white student at Syracuse University who was arrested in 1949 for apparently inciting a breach of peace while delivering an inflammatory or provocative speech in which he promoted equal rights while talking in an insulting way about some local politicians, organizations, and President Truman. Apparently, the officials arrested him when they thought that a riot might occur.

In the Court, Feiner argued that his arrest violated his right to free speech stated in the First Amendment. However, the Court found him guilty. Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson supported this decision, in his writing he stated that a speaker can't be arrested based on the content of his speech, but of the reaction of the crowd towards it, therefore Feiner's arrest was valid because the crowd's reaction was a clear and present danger to the peace and order in the streets.

The statement is true. In the case Feiner v. New York, Chief Justice Fred Vinson discussed in his opinion that the Court has used the “clear and present danger” principle. The chief justice believes that the arrest of Feiner was necessary in order to protect “the interest of the community in maintaining peace and order on its streets”.