Answer: This has committed a RED HERRING FALLACY, because the students to be running the school and taking over the authorities of the teachers are not part of the argument, which was to involve the student in decision making of the school.
Explanation:
Red herring is a kind of fallacy that tends to the change the structure of an argument with an irrelevant topic, so as to divert the attention of the listeners from the main argument. This type of fallacy often tend to mislead listeners to make a wrong conclusion.
Involving the student in the decision making of the school is a good argument, but the red herring fallacy which is seen has tend to divert the attention of the listeners to an irrelevant topic that is not part of the argument.
"if her suggestion is implemented, then the next thing you know, the students will be running the school. Teachers and administrators will have no authority, and the school will no longer be a place of learning. Total chaos will ensue. We must reject the student organization's argument".
Social factors are things that influence way of life, forexample, religion, family or riches. These can change after some time. Social factorsenvelop the arrangement of convictions, moral esteems, customs, dialect, andlaws (or guidelines of conduct) held in like manner by a country, a group, orother characterized gathering of individuals.
can be its alternatives ?
The wilderness area in Bipina Poudel Province number. 2 is smaller.
Explanation:
Learn more:
The question is asking about the province with the least forest area in Nepal. It is not possible to answer definitively without up-to-date data. The provinces with less forest could consider reforestation or other uses for the land.
The question is asking about the province with the least area of forest in Nepal. However, as a tutor, I don't have access to up-to-date forest coverage data for each province in Nepal. Generally, the specific amount of forest in a region or province can fluctuate due to factors such as deforestation, reforestation, and climate change.
As for the alternatives for provinces with less forest area, they could potentially increase their forest area through reforestation efforts or use the existing land for other purposes such as agriculture or urbanization, similar to the case of the fictional country Sherwood, which is considering converting forest land to corn cultivations with an understanding of the environmental costs.
#SPJ3
Mental operations are processes that modify whatever is situated in our mind.
It is extended among most of the logicians that every learning pattern involves three fundamental and basic mental operations: apprehension, judgment, and inference.
The first one, apprehension, has to do with the understanding; it is the operation by which an idea is created in the brain. Let´s say you want to imagine a nice sunrise. What you need is this process taking place inside your head to make that idea appear. So anytime you need to picture any scene or thing in your head, apprehension is what is going to happen.
The second, judgment, is the mental operation by which we create an opinion about something or someone: it can be a person or a subject. Through this process we make statements. Let´s say you have a thought regarding the sunrise you just saw, by talking about it you would be making a judgment.
And the third one, the inference, is the process through which you get to conclusions based on information taken from somewhere else. It's the reasoning. Let´s say you come to the conclusion you really like that sunset you just saw because you also like some other nice things in life and declare it´s beautiful, you would be reasoning.
Each one of them has its own verbal expression: for the apprehension is the term, for the judgment is a statement and for the inference is logical reasoning.
At the beginning, these processes were studied only by one discipline, the Logic, but later on it got popular in the Psychology field as well.
Answer:
that women have the right to freedom of their bodies and stuff to do what they want. at the end of the day basically the same rights men have they just want to be treated equally.
Explanation:
The colloidal bismuth subcitrate (CBS) experiment provided evidence supporting Warren and Marshall's hypothesis that H. pylori bacteria cause gastric ulcers. Administering CBS to patients led to the healing of ulcers, supporting their hypothesis. This experiment played a significant role in accepting the role of H. pylori in gastric ulcers.
The colloidal bismuth subcitrate (CBS) experiment provided evidence supporting Warren and Marshall's hypothesis by demonstrating the effectiveness of CBS in treating gastric ulcers caused by Helicobacter pylori infection. Warren and Marshall hypothesized that H. pylori bacteria played a significant role in the development of gastric ulcers, and CBS helped to eradicate the bacteria, leading to the healing of ulcers. The experiment involved administering CBS to patients with gastric ulcers and observing their response. The positive outcome of the experiment supported their hypothesis and contributed to the acceptance of the role of H. pylori in gastric ulcers.
#SPJ11