What did Randolph mean when he wrote “shake it to its foundations”?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

weaken or destroy government


Related Questions

Defend the logging company's reasons for taking action in the following scenario:A logging company discovers a patch in the forest that has a number of sick trees. After diagnosing the problem, they discover that the sickare not contagious. However, they are blocking sunlight from reaching underlying plants. The loggers cut down the sick trees and plantseedlings in their place.
Which of the following is NOT A change that occurred in the late 1800s?
Describe a discriminatory situation that you experienced or witnessed. Identify the individual aspects of this discrimination. Describe any institutionalized racism that you have observed or experienced.
Carnegie Hall was built
The leading cause of death and disability in children and young adults is: Unintentional Injuries Who primarily benefits from first aid training? Onself Properly applied, first aid may mean the difference between: Rapid recovery and long hospitalization, life and death, temporary disability and permanent injury If the victim is unresponsive, permission to give first aid is known as: Implied Consent In cases of psychiatric emergencies, who has authority to restrain and transport a person against the person's will? Police Officer Deviation from accepted standards of care that results in further injury to the victim is known as: Negligence Which statement concerning duty to act is correct? Follows the guidelines for standards of care, when employment requires it, when a pre-existing relationship exists A first aider who breaks his or her responsibility to a victim by failing to provide the type of care that another person with similar training would provide commits: Breach of Duty Which of the following statements concerning the Good Samaritan laws is true? They protect first aiders acting in good faith What level of care is a first aider expected to give? Proper medical care, standard of care, exceptional care __________ encourage(s) people to assist others in distress by granting them immunity against lawsuits. Good Samaritan Laws

Juvenile parolees are required to meet set standards of behavior, and if the rules are violated, the juvenile may have his or her parole revoked and be returned to an institution. This type of procedure is known as _____.

Answers

The correct answer is Community correction

Correction programs that supervise offenders outside of prison and are administered by agencies or courts with legal authority.

Community corrections include probation - correctional supervision within the community, rather than prison or prison - and probation - a period of probation and supervised release from prison.

Rewrite the sentence with the correct capitalization.every summer, my dad teaches a science class about sea turtles in the atlanic ocean.

Answers

Answer:

Every summer, my dad teaches a science class about sea turtles in the Atlantic Ocean

Explanation:

Every summer, my dad teacher a science class about sea turtles in the Atlantic Ocean.

When Mrs. Dalton is in the classroom, the students are obedient and controlled. When she steps into the hall to talk with a parent or administrator, the students talk, avoid work, tease each other, and waste time. The students are exhibiting

Answers

Answer:

Psychology of Compliance

Explanation:

The students will behave accordingly because the teacher is expecting this of them. When she leaves they no longer have to do what she expects of them. This type of compliance is called social compliance, it speaks to the expectation that an individual has on a group or crowd. The individuals in the group feel obligated to do what the single individual tells them to do or believes that s/he expects them to behave in a certain way. Whenever the individual leaves the order is broken down and there is no more an expectation or a requirement. This is mostly seen in school aged persons and is a phenomenon to observe.

In Griswold v. Connecticut, a case from 1965 concerning whether married people had the right to purchase and use contraception, the Supreme Court used the argument of "marital privacy" to assert the right to purchase and use contraception. The opinion drew on the Ninth Amendment. The Justices wrote: The Ninth Amendment to the Constitution may be regarded by some as a recent discovery, and may be forgotten by others, but, since 1791, it has been a basic part of the Constitution which we are sworn to uphold. To hold that a right so basic and fundamental and so deep-rooted in our society as the right of privacy in marriage may be infringed because that right is not guaranteed in so many words by the first eight amendments to the Constitution is to ignore the Ninth Amendment, and to give it no effect whatsoever. Moreover, a judicial construction that this fundamental right is not protected by the Constitution because it is not mentioned in explicit terms by one of the first eight amendments or elsewhere in the Constitution would violate the Ninth Amendment, which specifically states that "[t]he enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." This passage references what are called "unenumerated rights." Based on reading the passage, an unenumerated right is

Answers

Answer:

Based on reading the passage, an unenumerated right is a right considered implicit, natural and inherent to man. Therefore, there is no need to write it in a constitution or a law, or it arises as a direct consequence of the rights that are legally stated.

For example, as arises from the ruling in Griswold v. Connecticut, the marital privacy right, which arises from the marriage institute itself as well as from the generic right to privacy. In other words, the right to marital privacy is not explicitly stated, but derives from rights that indeed are.

In short, certain rights do not need to be introduced into laws, but are evident in the face of a correct interpretation of the Constitution and the laws that complement it.

Answer: Based on reading the passage, an unenumerated right is a right that is not mentioned in explicit terms, occurring naturally to an individual. This makes sense to say unenmerated right is a right that is possible with the use of common sense, like an unwritten rule.

Jen decides that Marla is a nice person because she comes from the same state as Jen. This is an example of:______ a. negative prejudice. b. stereotyping. c. positive prejudice. d. discrimination.

Answers

Answer:

B

Explanation:

How does Nathanson argue that killing in self defense is compatible with respect for the dignity of human life?

Answers

Answer: Nathanson says that there is no way to respect the dignity of both people’s right

Explanation:

Killing is not an easy thing to do, but there is a great difference between self-defense and outright killing, but either ways, someone will definitely die. Nathanson says that there is no way to respect the dignity of both people’s right.

Final answer:

Nathanson argues that killing in self-defense is compatible with the respect for the dignity of human life by upholding the right to bodily autonomy and moral considerations. Killing in such circumstances is seen as a response to an immediate threat to one's life and not as an act of aggression.

Explanation:

The explanation of how Nathanson argues that killing in self defense is compatible with respect for the dignity of human life lies in the concept of the sanctity of human life, the right to bodily autonomy, and moral and rational considerations. According to Nathanson, killing in self-defense is morally justified when one's life is in immediate threat or danger. In such cases, the dignity of human life is respected as the act of self-defense is carried out in preservation of one's own life.

Nathanson suggests that every individual has a right to bodily autonomy – the right of individuals to determine what happens to their bodies. When the life of an individual is threatened, they have the right to defend themselves, which may at times involve killing as a last resort. This act of killing is seen as a response to an immediate danger and not as an act of aggression.

Moreover, Nathanson's argument can also be connected to moral reasoning. He doesn't argue that killing is generally acceptable, but rather, only under very specific circumstances such as self-defense where it's seen as the lesser of two evils. Thus, recognizing the sanctity and dignity of human life while also acknowledging situations where self-defense is necessary involves a complex interplay of moral, ethical and personal considerations according to Nathanson.

Learn more about Nathanson's Argument here:

brainly.com/question/37686850

#SPJ11