Answer:
B. Focus more on individuals and their specific circumstances
Explanation:
Organic solidarity is a theory developed by Emile Durkheim which explains that it is the individual efforts of people that lead to a thriving society. Individuals, although different with their peculiarities contribute to growth through a network of interdependence.
Mechanical solidarity on the other hand attributes social cohesion to the sameness of individuals. Organic solidarity employs restitutive sanctions, while Mechanical solidarity employs repressive sanctions.
Organic solidarity, found in complex, modern societies, emphasizes the specifics of individual circumstances when it comes to social sanctions. They lean more toward rehabilitative social sanctions, with the aim for integrating individuals back into society.
The concept of organic solidarity and mechanical solidarity comes from the sociologist Émile Durkheim who used these terms to explain different types of societies. Organic solidarity is characteristic of modern, complex societies where people are interconnected through a web of different roles and professions. Such societies tend to have a greater emphasis on individuals and their specific circumstances, which informs their approach to social sanctions. Rehabilitative social sanctions are more common, as these societies understand that a punishment system needs to take into account the individual's unique circumstances, not just the act itself. These societies are generally interested in rehabilitating individuals and reintegrating them into society rather than simply punishing them.
#SPJ3
Psychoanalytic theories of personality focus on the unconscious mind and unresolved childhood conflicts while humanistic theories focus on the inherent goodness of people and their drive for self-actualization.
Psychoanalytic theories of personality emphasize the unconscious mind and unresolved conflicts from childhood. They are deeply rooted in the work of Sigmund Freud who posited that personality is largely determined by the interaction of three key components: the id, the ego, and the superego. The id represents instinctual needs, the ego tries to satisfy those needs in a societally acceptable way, and the superego serves as our moral conscience.
On the flip side, humanistic theories of personality emphasize the inherent goodness of humans and their drive towards self-actualization. They focus on human potential and purpose in life, giving special importance to the concepts of free will and individual experience. Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow were key contributors to this field, with Maslow's hierarchy of needs being a major component of humanistic theories.
#SPJ6
Answer:
because us dollor is consedered as the medium of international exchange
Explanation:
pls dont judge me if i'm wrong
Portugal took control of the Indian Ocean by force.
c.
The Philippines were used as a gateway to trade American silver with Asian economies.
b.
The Dutch did not try to impose anything but trade onto the Chinese.
d.
Europeans waited for civil war to collapse the Mughal Kingdom, then moved in to India.
Answer:
D.
Europeans waited for civil war to collapse the Mughal Kingdom, then moved in to India.
Explanation:
During the colonial period, colonial powers had a significant effect on Southeast Asia. ... The arrival of Christianity that brought by the Europeans have affected Southeast Asian society and culture. In addition, a large demand for labor resulted in mass immigration that caused the demographical change.
Treaty gave France control of most of territory in southern Vietnam. ... European nations needed raw materials, European leaders wanted power and land, and they believed in social Darwinism.
Between 1945 and 1960, three dozen new states in Asia and Africa achieved autonomy or outright independence from their European colonial rulers. There was no one process of decolonization. In some areas, it was peaceful, and orderly. In many others, independence was achieved only after a protracted revolution.
Answer:
That statement is false.
Explanation:
Babies that are considered slow-to-warm-up are just extremely cautious if they're in new environment or if they're near the people that they're unfamiliar with. It's a form of survival mechanism that is designed to help infants to deal with unknown stimulus.
That's being said, their emotions in the face of new stimulus do not necessarily can be considered as Negative. It's just how they personally deal with the stimulus.
The given statement "babies who are considered slow-to-warm-up tend react to stimulation with negative emotions" is true as they may initially exhibit negative emotions before gradually adapting to the new situation.
Babies with a "slow-to-warm-up" temperament tend to exhibit initial hesitancy and discomfort when confronted with novel situations or stimuli. They might display signs of shyness, withdrawal, or fussiness when faced with unfamiliar people, places, or experiences. Over time, as they become more accustomed to the situation, they gradually warm up and show a more positive response.
This temperament style contrasts with "easy" babies who readily adapt to new situations and "difficult" babies who might react strongly and negatively to various stimuli. Understanding these different temperamental tendencies can help caregivers provide appropriate support and create a nurturing environment that suits each baby's unique needs.
Know more about slow-to-warm-up here
#SPJ3
Answer: Trade affects all of the social classes of Egypt because so many different kinds of resources were traded. For example, peasants needed cheap food to survive on, while Artisans used ebony, linen, iron, and copper for their crafts. Scribes traded for better food, such as meat, beer, and fish.
Explanation:
Trade was dangerous in Egypt due to political instability, banditry and robbery on trading routes, and external threats such as plagues which impacted commerce and led to socio-economic disruptions.
Trade in Egypt was perilous for several reasons, throughout different epochs. During the end of the New Kingdom era, Egypt's command over the trade routes in Canaan and Syria dwindled, making trade more treacherous due to increasing instability in commercial centers and banditry on the roads. For example, an Egyptian envoy on a trade mission to Phoenicia was reportedly robbed by his own crew, denied promised supplies, and attacked by migrants. As Egypt's regional influence weakened, such predicaments became more frequent.
In the Mamluk era, trade routes through the Nile delta suffered due to intense political instability. This was in part triggered by the plague, whose effects were worsened by accompanying food shortages. Populations migrating to cities like Cairo and Alexandria for employment, thereby, increased their chances of contracting the plague.
Moreover, banditry and robbery were persistent threats due to the lucrative potential of traded goods. Inadequate security for traders resulted in trade routes veering away from risky territories. This was especially profound in weakly governed states, where caravansaries (inns for traders) were not sufficiently secured, creating additional hindrances to the smooth functioning of trade.
#SPJ2
Her argument about study alone is very strong. She probably have an average B, she made some C courses and because of this situation this makes her argument become a little weak because of that courses.