1. The impact of the fall of the Roman Empire in 476 on Western Europe was B. Trade and commerce in Western Europe declined.
2. The reason Pope Urban II called for a Holy War or Crusade in 1095 CE was C. To free Palestine and Jerusalem from Muslim rule.
3. The Book of Kells contains A. The New Testament of the Bible.
4. The Great Schism between the Eastern and Western Christian Church was caused by B. The use ofunleavened bread and the power of the Pope.
The fall of the Roman Empire did not weaken the Church. There was an absence of a centralized government. Germanic invaders seized the opportunity to devastate European cities and monsteries.
Gradually, power shifted from the palace to the Church and enabled her to possess too much political influence which later resulted in the Great Schism.
The Great Schism referred to the splitting of the Church into Western Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches.
The Great Schism, which hovered over Ecclesiastical differences, started in 1053.
Thus, we can conclude that the fall of the Roman Empire empowered the Church in Western Europe.
Learn more about the fall of the Roman Empire and Western Europe at brainly.com/question/2033361
#SPJ1
The United States is the nation that supported the Nationalist Party in the Chinese Civil War.
The main reason for United States supporting the Nationalist Party was in their quest trying to stop communism from spreading.
Hence, the United States is the nation that supported the Nationalist Party in the Chinese Civil War.
Therefore, the Option C is correct.
Read more about communism
Answer:
Read Exp:
Explanation:
The U.S as well as France and the Soviet Union (But U.S mainly..)
Answer:
In many respects, the strongest arguments for PR derive from the way in which the system avoids the anomalous results of plurality/majority systems and is better able to produce a representative legislature. For many new democracies, particularly those which face deep societal divisions, the inclusion of all significant groups in the legislature can be a near-essential condition for democratic consolidation. Failing to ensure that both minorities and majorities have a stake in developing political systems can have catastrophic consequences, such as seeking power through illegal means.
PR systems in general are praised for the way in which they:
Faithfully translate votes cast into seats won, and thus avoid some of the more destabilizing and ‘unfair’ results thrown up by plurality/majority electoral systems. ‘Seat bonuses’ for the larger parties are minimized, and small parties can have their voice heard in the legislature.
Encourage or require the formation of political parties or groups of like-minded candidates to put forward lists. This may clarify policy, ideology, or leadership differences within society, especially when, as in Timor-Leste at independence, there is no established party system.
Give rise to very few wasted votes. When thresholds are low, almost all votes cast in PR elections go towards electing a candidate of choice. See Voluntary Party Candidate Quotas to read who may determine the selection process in political parties. This increases the voters’ perception that it is worth making the trip to the polling booth at election time, as they can be more confident that their vote will make a difference to the election outcome, however small.
Facilitate minority parties’ access to representation. Unless the threshold is unduly high, or the district magnitude is unusually low, then any political party with even a small percentage of the vote can gain representation in the legislature. This fulfils the principle of inclusion, which can be crucial to stability in divided societies and has benefits for decision making in established democracies, such as achieving a more balanced representation of minorities in decision-making bodies and providing role models of minorities as elected representatives.
Encourage parties to campaign beyond the districts in which they are strong or where the results are expected to be close. The incentive under PR systems is to maximize the overall vote regardless of where those votes might come from. Every vote, even from areas where a party is electorally weak, goes towards gaining another seat.
Restrict the growth of ‘regional fiefdoms’. Because PR systems reward minority parties with a minority of the seats, they are less likely to lead to situations where a single party holds all the seats in a given province or district. This can be particularly important to minorities in a province which may not have significant regional concentrations or alternative points of access to power.
Lead to greater continuity and stability of policy. The West European experience suggests that parliamentary PR systems score better with regard to governmental longevity, voter participation, and economic performance. The rationale behind this claim is that regular switches in government between two ideologically polarized parties, as can happen in FPTP systems, makes long-term economic planning more difficult, while broad PR coalition governments help engender a stability and coherence in decision making which allow for national development.
Make power-sharing between parties and interest groups more visible. In many new democracies, power-sharing between the numerical majority of the population who hold political power and a small minority who hold economic power is an unavoidable reality. Where the numerical majority dominates the legislature and a minority sees its interests expressed in the control of the economic sphere, negotiations between different power blocks are less visible, less transparent, and less accountable (e.g. in Zimbabwe during its first 20 years of independence). It has been argued that PR, by including all interests in the legislature, offers a better hope that decisions will be taken in the public eye and by a more inclusive cross-section of the society.
Explanation:
you, each asking you to write a letter to the sultan in charge of the Ottoman Empire. One group wants you
to convince the sultan that he should begin pushing the empire toward industrialization. The other group
wants just the opposite, to convince the sultan to continue resisting the
influence of the Industrial
boulonne qedearning and price 216 344
10 sono per learning. Tout
Revolution,
Since both groups are offering good wages, you decide to help both! Write two short letters to the leader
of the Ottoman Empire. The first should provide convincing evidence that his empire would benefit from
industrialization. The second should warn him of the harm that will come to the Ottoman Empire if he
decides to industrialize. In each letter, support your argument with evidence of how industrialization has
affected Great Britain. (10 points)
Answer:
Dear sultan, the leader of the Ottoman Empire. I am writing on your behalf to inform you that your country will greatly benefit from industrializing your country. You will become one of the most powerful countries in the Mediterranean and Europe. By industrializing your country you will gain all the essentials you will need to become your own powerful country in the means of military, economic, and political power. If Germany were to win the war you might be able to expand into Russia.
Dear sultan, the leader of the Ottoman Empire. I am writing to you on behalf of your country to inform you of the dangers if you decide to industrialize your country. If Germany were to lose your country would fall and Russia would expand into your country. If you industrialize you will be using up resources that you may not have, you may lose some of your people due to war that will come. And your people may get sick from all the pollution and may run out of resources
Explanation:
True or False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
January 1492, the Spanish monarchs, flush with victory, agreed to support his voyage.
Answer:
Orcoquiza
Explanation:
The Karankawa tribe lived near the Texas coast, ate shellfish, and used alligator oil as a mosquito repellent. The tribe adapted to their specific environment, which included using materials and resources available to them in innovative ways.
The tribe that lived near the coastal regions of Texas and had a diet including shellfish, and used alligator oil as a mosquito repellant was the Karankawa tribe. The Karankawa were Native American people concentrated in southern Texas along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico. They were known to be skilled fishers and hunters, shellfish being a staple in their diet. As a way to protect themselves from mosquito bites, they discovered and applied alligator oil onto their skin. The tribe is known to have lived in autonomous clans and adapted to environmental conditions specific to their living regions.
#SPJ12
What key event influenced the writing of this document?
a.Meiji Restoration
b.Cold War
c.Industrial Revolution
d.Russian Revolution
Answer:
The correct answer is C. The Industrial Revolution infuenced the writing of this document.
Explanation:
The Industrial Revolution was a set widespread societal and technological changes that started in the UK in the early 1750s. The process in England was linked to the enclosure movement, the privatization of public rights that caused many small farmers to lose their livelihood. It provided both investment capital for landowners, who were richer, and laborers who were forced to enter the cities.
Useful steam engines were developed in the 18th century. Initially, they were useful for operating machines in the textile industry and in the mining industry. After a quarter, steamships and railways with steam locomotives were common, and allowed transport to take place to a greater extent. During the 19th century, the industrial upheavals were spread to Western Europe, North America and Japan.
In the process, there was an extensive relocation of the popular tradition. Many people move from the countryside to the urban and industrial communities that have been built up. Thus begin a process of urbanization. Broadly speaking, the industrial revolution was a transformation from a peasant society with an emphasis on agriculture, to an industrial society with an emphasis on industrial production.
The Industrial Revolution was a widespread social and technological change that began in the UK in the early 1750s.
The industrial revolution was a transition from an agricultural society focused on agriculture, to an industrial society with a strong emphasis on industrial production.
The English process was linked to a fenced-in organization, the practice of public rights that caused many smallholder farmers to lose their livelihoods.
It provided both investment funds to landowners, the wealthy, and the workers who were forced to move into the cities.
Useful steam engines were developed in the 18th century. Initially, they were useful for machinery in the textile industry and in the mining industry.
Therefore, these transformations were seen during the industrial revolution. Option C is the correct answer.
To learn more about Industrial revolution, refer: