LAW COLLEGE

When the Constitution entitles all citizens to “due process” of law, what does this phrase mean?It is C) Every citizen has the right to a trial

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

D: all of the above

Explanation:

Related Questions

Your opinion on Free public transport for senior citizens.
What is needed to prove that there is defamation as is suggested by shelly and tony?
If the police arrive at Larrys office without probable cause or a warrant and demand to search the premises, which amendment protects him from this type of search?
How many witnesses are required to convict someone of treason
Which of the following guidelines should a supervisor follow to create and maintain a harassment-free workplace? (Select all that apply.)A. Know, publicize and enforce the district’s sexual-harassment policy and complaint procedure.B. Identify potential problems and address them promptly.C. Address only confirmed incidents of sexual harassment.D. Help resolve issues that stem from sexual-harassment acts and allegations.E. Serve as a role model to others.

What type of law regulates government bureaucracies?O A. Criminal law
B. Administrative law
O c. Procedural law
O D. Civil law

Answers

Answer:

B. Administrative law

Final answer:

Administrative law regulates government bureaucracies, governing the operations of administrative agencies and enforcing regulations.

Explanation:

The type of law that regulates government bureaucracies is Administrative law. This area of law deals with the activities of administrative agencies of government including rule-making, adjudication, or the enforcement of a specific regulatory agenda. For instance, administrative laws govern the operations of the Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Communications Commission, and many other governmental bodies.

Learn more about Administrative Law here:

brainly.com/question/32964837

#SPJ2

There arecolors used to produce seven different types of traffic signs,
a) 7
b) 8
c) 9
d) 10

Answers

The correct statement will be that there are seven different types of colors used to denote the different types of traffic signs. So, the correct option that matches the statement above is A.

The seven different colors used are the colors which are primary in nature as they are considered to be the brightest colors and help the drivers and people on roads to identify the traffic conditions.

  • The main three colors used for denoting the traffic signals are Red, Yellow and Green where Green signs to commute, Yellow denotes to turn on the ignition and the red denotes to stop at the signal.

  • However there are four other colors out of the colors of the rainbow that are used for denoting different signals of the traffics. The other four colors being Violet, Indigo, Blue and Orange.

  • The reason that these colors are used to denote the traffic signs is because these colors travel the farthest and enable the drivers to identify the traffic sign from a further distance.

Hence, the correct option is A that there are seven different colors used to denote the different types of traffic signs.

To know more about traffic signs, click the link below.

brainly.com/question/4729352

Answer:a 7

Explanation:

Select Yes if the item describes a society that functions under the rule of law.Select No if the item does not describe a society that functions under the rule of law.
People are treated equally under the law
V
Procedures for creating laws are done in private
People in government govern based on their wants/needs
Everyone must obey the laws
People are held accountable to the law

Answers

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

I don't think I have any explanation

21. All bills start in a committee, but the ideas for them can begin elsewhere. Ideas for laws canstart in all of these places EXCEPT: *
NEEDED FOR A TEST ASAP
a.With the president
b.With foreign leaders
c.With regular US citizens
d.With members of Congress

Answers

Answer:

C. :)

Explanation:

Answer:

b. With foreign leaders

Explanation:

Ideas for laws that CAN start in all of these places:

c. With regular US citizens  ⇒  You and I can come up with ideas for laws. In fact, most of the ideas for laws come from just regular US citizens.

d. With members of Congress  ⇒  Within Congress, representatives can come up with ideas for laws to help benefit the country. Members of the House of Representatives and the Senate can both do that.

a. With the president  ⇒  The president comes up with laws because he’s the one responsible for our country. So the president does still come up with ideas for laws to help with our country. But it’s not like the president gets to come up with anything he wants to and he can just sign the bill and it becomes a law. Every idea for a law always goes to Congress where the members decide if it’s good or not, including the president’s ideas.

Ideas for laws that CANNOT start in this place (the correct answer):

b. With foreign leaders  ⇒  Foreign leaders are leaders that are outside of our country. That’s what foreign means: overseas, distant, away, etc. Foreign leaders can’t come with ideas for laws because there not even in/part of our country.

In case you still don’t understand:

Example: Let’s say there is a King in England (there isn’t a king in England but this is just an example). Now, does the King of England get to come up with ideas for laws for our country? Absolutly not! He’s totally from a different country, and he doesn’t have the right to be in America’s business in making laws. He deals with his own country, not ours.

Hence,

Ideas for laws can start in all of these places EXCEPT:

b. With foreign leaders

Hope this helps! :D

Select the three legal requirements for mutual rescission to take place.

Answers

Answer:

killing killing killing

Explanation:mark me brainliest

A president attempting to influence congress to pass a legislative program might employ all of the following strategies except

Answers

Answer:

Denying campaign reelection funds to legislators who oppose the President's policy stand

Explanation:

The framers of the constitution of the United States of America, positioned the president in article 2, section 3 of the constitution to be the chief legislator, granting him the power to alter policy and make remarkable influence on which bills the house can pass at any time.  

Whether the president is popular or not, he or she can use the media to draw attention to the program of the legislature. Above all the possible means to influence the congress, the president is expected to refrain from denying legislative members who oppose his policies their respective campaign re-election funds.  

Final answer:

A president attempting to influence congress to pass a legislative program would not typically employ the strategy of ignoring Congress.

Explanation:

In order to influence Congress to pass a legislative program, a president can employ various strategies. However, one strategy that a president would not typically use is ignoring Congress. Ignoring Congress would not be an effective way to promote policy proposals and secure legislative achievements. Instead, presidents often employ strategies such as negotiation, persuasion, compromise, media attention, and leveraging their popularity to influence members of Congress.

Learn more about President's strategies to influence Congress here:

brainly.com/question/14365568

#SPJ12
Other Questions
Project: Lulu the Runaway DogProject Part A: Lulu the Runaway Dog Let's review the runaway dog example. When you see Lulu escape, you shout, "Come back, Lulu!" but Lulu the Labrador has already run through one neighbor's yard and is racing down the street. You decide that pursuing her in your fuel-efficient Focus would be the best course of action. However, you can't possibly end your phone conversation. After all, you are discussing the latest Dame Daisy video and analyzing it minute by minute. With your phone in one hand, car keys in the other, you rev up your car and head off to find Lulu. Jamie, Lulu's ten-year-old owner whom you are also babysitting, jumps in the car with you. As you are driving (a little faster than the speed limit) and talking on your phone, an annoying fly starts to buzz around your head. You shake your head and as you refocus and look ahead, there is Lulu—right in front of your car. You slam on your brakes and turn the wheels of the car sharply to the right with all your might to avoid hitting Lulu. A motorist opposite you drives onto the curb and bangs up the side of his car as he avoids hitting your vehicle. You slam into a utility pole, which was badly in need of repair, and knock it down. The pole hits a tree that smashes into a house and severely damages the front porch. Luckily, Lulu is fine. So is the motorist, who is very angry. Jamie is complaining that her wrist feels like it is all twisted. You cannot help thinking, "Oh boy, am I in trouble!" But you are "just a kid," right? Where do you start to sort out this mess? You start by contacting your cousin, Marjorie, who is a first-year law student at State University. You tell her every little detail you remember, including all events leading up to the accident. She wants to help you determine to whom you may have owed a duty of care and to whom you breached this duty. She sends you an email with the questions listed below. Please answer them. Marjorie's Questions: Who was involved in the accident? Did you owe a duty to anyone? If so, what duty or duties and to which particular individuals? Which duties did you breach? Were your actions the cause of any injuries? Were you actions an actual cause or a proximate cause, or both? For what damages could you be held liable? Are there any defenses against potential plaintiffs? If so, what are they? Provide a brief four- to five-paragraph answer. Project Part B: A Fire near Gidgits Galore Gidgits Galore borders a privately owned ten-acre forest. Pete owns the land. It is zoned "mixed," so businesses and residences can be found throughout the neighborhood. Through the forest is a multiresidence apartment building. Danny, a high-school senior who lives in one of the apartments, has crammed all night for his economics final and needs a break. He has decided to take a morning walk down one of the forest's paths, prodding the piles of leaves and clumps of moss with his walking stick. He sees what appeared to be a recently-used campfire, and pokes around it with his stick. As he wanders farther, he doesn't realize that he has reignited the fire. To make matters worse, it is unexpectedly windy that day. As the wind picks up, the flames leap over 200 feet to a storage shed used by the apartment building's maintenance workers. One of them, Don, has just arrived to get his lawnmower. He calls 911. While waiting, he tries to extinguish the flames with his jacket, but he stops when his work shirt catches fire. The flames also reach the tent of Cassie, the camper who lit the campfire the previous night. Cassie thought she had extinguished the fire as she set up her tent nearby. Cassie wakes up coughing from smoke inhalation and manages to exit the tent before it is destroyed by fire. One of Gidgits Galore's managers, Dianne, arrives to open up the store but is detoured by the smoke she sees in the distance. Soon she too is overwhelmed by its acrid smell, which brings on a severe asthma attack. As quickly as the flames started, the wind stops, and they die down. Firefighters who arrive on the scene are able to quickly extinguish the fire. You are a member of a mock jury in a negligence case. As a juror, one of your duties is to find the facts from the evidence presented and determine if there is enough evidence to show that the defendant was negligent. Sort out the facts in the present case. Prepare a brief argument (three to four paragraphs) outlining why Danny could be held negligent against the potential plaintiffs listed below. Don the maintenance worker Cassie the camper Dianne the GidgitsGalore employee Pete the landowner Prepare a brief argument (two to three paragraphs) showing why Danny's conduct did not amount to negligence against any of the potential plaintiffs listed above.
Which branch of government decides if a law violates the constitution?
James Keller was an employee at Radical Boards, Inc Radical Boards is a surf and skateboard shop that also sells clothing. While employed there, Radical Board's principal shareholder discovered that Keller had created peep holes in the shop's dressing rooms. When confronted with the peep holes, Keller denied ever using them and indicated that they were there to prevent shoplifting. The shop manager was told to fire Keller. Shortly after Keller left, a 16-year-old and her mother filed suit because the teen learned, through conversations with Keller, that he had seen her in the dressing room while she was trying on swimming suits. Keller was able to describe her not-generally-seen birthmarks to her. Keller has applied for a position at a summer camp for girls, ages 14-18. The camp director had called Radical Board's manager and asked for a reference on Keller. A) Radical Board has no liability if it simply verifies Keller's employment there. B) Radical Board has liability for its failure to prosecute Keller. C) Radical Board has no liability for the actions of employees beyond their job description. D) Radical Board enjoys a privilege against defamation if it discloses the peep hole story. E)None of the above
Es un organismo Humanitario imparcial de carácter internacional que ofrece sus servicios a las partes en conflicto armado, protegiendo a las victimas de la guerra y de la violencia interna.