Which branch of government decides if a law violates the constitution?

Answers

Answer 1

Answer:

The branch of government that decides if a law violates the Constitution is the Judicial branch. The Judicial branch, specifically the Supreme Court, has the power of judicial review, which allows it to determine the constitutionality of laws and government actions. If the Supreme Court finds that a law violates the Constitution, it can declare the law unconstitutional and render it invalid.

The judicial branch is that branch of the governmentthat interprets the law, settles disputes and administers justice to all citizens. The judicial branch is considered the watchdog of democracy, and also the guardian of the Constitution. The judicial branch has the authority to render a law invalid if the law seems to violate the constitution.

To learn more about "Branch of the government" visit: brainly.com/question/8480333

#SPJ11

Answer 2

Answer:

Answer: The correct answer is the Judicial Branch.

Explanation:

The Judicial branch of the government decides whether laws are unconstitutional, among other things.

Related Questions

The mac group does not replace the primary functions of eocs or other dispatch organizations. T/F?
HELP ASAP!!!!! LIMITED TIME TEST!!!! COLLEGEColleges will sometimes include Expected Student Contributions intheir financial aid packages. This is a sample aid estimate fromStanford University. How much is Stanford asking this student tocontribute toward their education by working a job during theacademic year?Select one:47, 3315,5682, 200
what is the Visual and Non-verbal Elements of the 2020 presidential Debate and the Possible Soundbites.
Identity theft maylower credit interestreduce credit balancesaffect the credit scorecancel debt-to-credit ratio
I need help please.

Select Yes if the item describes a society that functions under the rule of law.Select No if the item does not describe a society that functions under the rule of law.
People are treated equally under the law
V
Procedures for creating laws are done in private
People in government govern based on their wants/needs
Everyone must obey the laws
People are held accountable to the law

Answers

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

I don't think I have any explanation

John owned an apartment and leased it to Steve. The lease agreement was for one year. After ten months, Steve told John that he was moving out of the apartment immediately. When John went to the apartment, he saw that Steve had put holes in the walls, ruined the carpets, and damaged the wiring. John was told that repairs would take at least two months. John sued Steve for damage to the apartment and for the rent payments for the last two months of the lease. Steve argues that the remaining rent owed should be offset by John's duty to find another tenant and mitigate his damages. The court would most likely rule in favor of(a) Steve, because John had a duty to mitigate his damages(b) John, because Steve argued against his recovery in their dispute(c) Steve, because John could have rented the apartment "as is"(d) John, because the apartment could not be rented for two months due to the damage

Answers

Answer:

d. John, because the apartment could not be rented for two months due to damage.

Explanation:

The main parts of a lease agreement, is the leasea term, whis generally is 1 year, and in case an early termination exist, it should let the owner know with time. Then the deposit should be specified as a security for damages or unpaid bills. In case the deposit existed then the court eill rule in favoir of Steve.

Describe the experience of being a criminal defendant.

Answers

Answer:

eh, you face a lot of descrimination and hate especialy from people of the defendent family.

Explanation:

WILL MAKR BRAINLIESTPerson A is riding on a bus. Person B walks up to person A, and pulls out a knife, then says "Get out of MY seat or I'll stab you." What crimes, if any, have been committed? (Refer to legislation)

Answers

Answer:

threatening

Explanation:

no need. someone explained above

21. All bills start in a committee, but the ideas for them can begin elsewhere. Ideas for laws canstart in all of these places EXCEPT: *
NEEDED FOR A TEST ASAP
a.With the president
b.With foreign leaders
c.With regular US citizens
d.With members of Congress

Answers

Answer:

C. :)

Explanation:

Answer:

b. With foreign leaders

Explanation:

Ideas for laws that CAN start in all of these places:

c. With regular US citizens ⇒ You and I can come up with ideas for laws. In fact, most of the ideas for laws come from just regular US citizens.

d. With members of Congress ⇒ Within Congress, representatives can come up with ideas for laws to help benefit the country. Members of the House of Representatives and the Senate can both do that.

a. With the president ⇒ The president comes up with laws because he’s the one responsible for our country. So the president does still come up with ideas for laws to help with our country. But it’s not like the president gets to come up with anything he wants to and he can just sign the bill and it becomes a law. Every idea for a law always goes to Congress where the members decide if it’s good or not, including the president’s ideas.

Ideas for laws that CANNOT start in this place (the correct answer):

b. With foreign leaders ⇒ Foreign leaders are leaders that are outside of our country. That’s what foreign means: overseas, distant, away, etc. Foreign leaders can’t come with ideas for laws because there not even in/part of our country.

In case you still don’t understand:

Example: Let’s say there is a King in England (there isn’t a king in England but this is just an example). Now, does the King of England get to come up with ideas for laws for our country? Absolutly not! He’s totally from a different country, and he doesn’t have the right to be in America’s business in making laws. He deals with his own country, not ours.

Hence,

Ideas for laws can start in all of these places EXCEPT:

b. With foreign leaders

Hope this helps! :D

Do you know any good websites to practice law? Please write them down with a link.

Answers

Answers is a link it helps with all your answer it gives you the answers I always use it you should try it it’s free

Other Questions

You have stopped for a train at a railroad crossing that is marked with a Crossbuck sign. When the train has passed, A: You should wait until the departing train is at least 500 feet from the crossing before proceeding. B: You must not proceed until you are sure there are no other trains approaching on any of the tracks. C: You can proceed as soon as the departing train has cleared the crossing.

is the most common screening test used to look for HIV antibodies. a) Western blot assay b) Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) c) Radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) d) Indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA)

Who was the first hispanic to serve on the supreme court

How to stop the wars in Asia?