The experimenter conducts the statistical analyses and finds that participants in the experimental condition (i.e., those who consumed 3 alcoholic beverages) reported more positive emotions than did participants in the neutral condition (i.e., those consumed 3 non-alcoholic beverages). Importantly, this observed difference in emotional responses surpassed the threshold for significance (p <.05). 1. Given this evidence, the researcher should accept the null hypothesis. A. True • B. False C. Not enough information .
2. Given this evidence, the researcher should reject the null hypothesis. A. True B. False C. Not enough information .
3. Given this evidence, the researcher should accept the alternative hypothesis. A. True B. False C. Not enough information . . .
4. Given this evidence, the researchers should reject the alternative hypothesis. A. True B. False C. Not enough information .

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

1. False

2.True

3.True

4.false

Explanation:

Given that the difference surpasses the threshold level it means the experiment is highly significant according to statistics a p-value less than 0.05 (p ≤ 0.05) is statistically significant.

This shows that the null hypothesis is less than a 5% probability correct and the alternative is more than 95% correct.

Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis, and accept the alternative hypothesis as the correct hypothesis


Related Questions

In Bronze AgeBronze was present in ------------------ Mountains. People in the UAE region traded that with Mesopotamia, which led to economic growth.
Correspondence from Bernardo de Gálvez to John Campbell.And I, who am indignant at my own credulity and the noble manner in which it is pretended to hallucinate me, must not, nor do I wish to, hear other propositions than those of surrender, assuring your Excellency, that as it will not be my fault, I shall see Pensacola burn with the same indifference, that I shall see its cruel incendiaries perish upon its ashes. God keep your Excellency many years. Island of Sta. Rosa, March 22, 1781.–“Diary of the Operations against Pensacola,”Bernardo de GálvezWhich statement best explains Gálvez’s intentions for the remainder of the siege?He vows to protect the city at all costs even if it means losing the fight.He intends to keep fighting until Campbell surrenders, even if the city burns.He declares his troops will go into hiding to escape the fires Campbell has set.He plans to honor their agreement to protect the city, even if Campbell does not.
Describe America’s position and goals post World War II, including what assumptions were made. 2. Describe the Soviet Union’s position and goals post World War II.
A technique that many teachers have taught their students to promote metacognition is?
How did people in the South feel about scalawags?

Connie is a concrete operational thinker whereas Forrest is a formal operational thinker. Which of the following statements is most likely to be true? Forrest is better than Connie in abstract reasoning. Connie is better than Forrest in combinatorial reasoning. Forrest is more likely than Connie to focus on the tangible and real aspects of a task. Connie is better than Forrest at hypothetical reasoning.

Answers

Answer:

Forrest is better than Connie in abstract reasoning.

Explanation:

Formal operational thinker, is a term that describes an individual, speifically those from age 12 into adulthood.

Formal operational thinker are characterized by their ability to reason in an abstract manner or concept. It is often associated with ability to formulate ideas or hypothesis and test them to reach a definite conclusion.

On the other hand, Concrete Operational thinker are characterized by people often kids of age seven or eight, whereby they start to perform mental operations in a way that involves physical world rather than abstract concept.

For example, a child knows a primary 1 mathematics teacher who is tough, another primary 2 mathematics teacher, who is also tough, and the same is true for a primary 3 mathematics teacher. The child may conclude that primary mathematics are tough.

Hence, in this case, the right answer is: Forrest is better than Connie in abstract reasoning.

The Constitution states limits on the powers of the national government. What type of governmental system does this reflect

Answers

Answer:

I believe it is Federalism.

Explanation:

I hope the image helps.

What was the 27th amendment

Answers

Answer:

The 27th Amendment prohibits any law that increases or decreases the salary of members of Congress from taking effect until the start of the next set of terms of office for representatives.

Explanation:

This amendment was created to prevent members of Congress from giving themselves pay raises.

No Law varying the compensation for the services of the senators and representative shall take affect until an election of representatives shall have intervened

sorry if that’s sound off tryna get points :,)

How is a concurring opinion different from a dissenting opinion? A) A concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority.


B) A concurring opinion asserts that two similar cases should be aligned and ruled on together, while a dissenting opinion insists that the case being heard is singular and unique.


C) A concurring opinion demands that all justices rule in the same way on a case, while a dissenting opinion explains the differing opinions of justices who ruled the same way on a case.


D) A concurring opinion explains why a justice disagrees with the majority decision, but abstains from ruling on the case, while a dissenting opinion describes the feelings of the majority.

Answers

Answer:

A)

Explanation:

The main difference between these two terms is that a concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority. Each of which tends to ocurr often in court cases where various judges analyze and pass judgment of another judges decision on a specific case. With a concurring opinion most, if not all, judges agree with the decision that has been made but tend to give different reasons as to why they believe the decision was justified.

Answer:

A: A concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority.

Explanation:

I did the quiz. here's proof:

As an academic economist, Professor Boudreaux is certainly familiar with performing research. Why didn't he simply perform the research on pediatric gastroenterology necessary to acquire the same level of knowledge as Dr. Bostwick and diagnose his son on his own?

Answers

Answer:

Check the explanation

Explanation:

Professor Boudreaux started working less as an economist that he was initially trained as and hiring the services of Dr. Bostwick which would make him have to give up to stop working and learn pediatric gastroenterology, which at best the outcome would have been all the same.

A. Dr. Bostwick was able to offer medical services that rarely or did not meet up or satisfy his own wants, so he traded those services for money which he later on used to purchase things that satisfied his wants.

Juanita has taken six courses at Valley Community College, and she has a grade average of B so far. All the courses she has taken have been in sociology and psychology. She’s thinking of enrolling in another course next term, and she expects to make at least a B in whatever she takes. Suppose that when she took the previous courses, Juanita had done all her studying alone because she didn’t know any of the other students at Valley but that now she knows several good students and plans to study with them when she takes her next course. Would her argument be stronger or weaker than if she were planning to study alone? Discuss

Answers

Her argument about study alone is very strong. She probably have an average B, she made some C courses and because of this situation this makes her argument become a little weak because of that courses.