What's the nearest integer and the nearest tenth
What's the nearest integer and the nearest tenth - 1

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

nearest integer 27 by 4


Related Questions

The figure below is a scale drawing of a garden. If the scale used 1/4 inch = 3 feet, then what is the perimeter of the actual garden?
Factor completely: 4d^3+3d^2-14d
If f(x) = 2x2 +5./(x-2), complete the following statement:f(0) =
In a study of 788 randomly selected medical malpractice​ lawsuits, it was found that 494 of them were dropped or dismissed. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that most medical malpractice lawsuits are dropped or dismissed.Which of the following is the hypothesis test to be conducted?A.Upper H 0 : p less than 0.5Upper H 1 : p equals 0.5B.Upper H 0 : p greater than 0.5Upper H 1 : p equals 0.5C.Upper H 0 : p equals 0.5Upper H 1 : p not equals 0.5D.Upper H 0 : p equals 0.5Upper H 1 : p less than 0.5E.Upper H 0 : p not equals 0.5Upper H 1 : p equals 0.5F.Upper H 0 : p equals 0.5Upper H 1 : p greater than 0.5What is the test statistic?Z =(Round to two decimal places as needed.)What is the conclusion about the null hypothesis?A. Reject the null hypothesis because the P-value is greater than the significance level, alpha.B. Fail to reject the null hypothesis because the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level, alpha.C. Fail to reject the null hypothesis because the P-value is greater than the significance level, alpha.D. Reject the null hypothesis because the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level, alpha.What is the final conclusion?A.There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that most medical malpractice lawsuits are dropped or dismissed.B.There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that most medical malpractice lawsuits are dropped or dismissed.C.There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that most medical malpractice lawsuits are dropped or dismissed.D.There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that most medical malpractice lawsuits are dropped or dismissed.
Refer to Problem 5.22. How many cookies in a batch of 100should the manager expect to discard if company policy requiresthat all chocolate-chip cookies sold have at least four chocolate-chipparts?

HELP 100 PointsIf △NMK ≅ △TRP, then answer the following questions:
a. Complete the congruence statement: △MNK ≅ △_______
b. What side is congruent to ≅ ______
c. Solve for x. _____

Answers

The given statements to be completed are completed as follows;

A) △MNK ≅ △RTP

B) TR ≅ NM

C) x = 7

We are given that;

△NMK ≅ △TRP

This means that Triangle NMK is congruent to Triangle TRP.

A) The naming of △NMK is now △MNK. Thus, we have to now re-name Triangle TRP to match the naming of △MNK. Thus;

△MNK ≅ △RTP

B) From the 2 given triangles, we can see that TR and NM are the same length and also perpendicular lines.

Thus they are congruent to each other and as such;

TR ≅ NM

C) Since TR and NM are congruent to each other. Then;

TR = NM

Thus;

3x - 1 = 20

3x = 20 + 1

3x = 21

x = 21/3

x = 7

Read more at; brainly.com/question/13547762

Answer:

A-△MNK ≅ △RTP

B- TR≅NM

C- X=7

Step-by-step explanation:

I did the assignment loves.

The amount of chlorine needed to treat a swimming pool is directly proportional to the volume of the poolWhat is the constant of proportionality for this relationship

Answers

The amount of chlorine needed to treat a swimming pool is directly proportional to the volume of the poolWhat is the constant of proportionality for this relationship

The answer to this question is 0.002

How to convert from point slope form to slope intercept form

Answers

Answer:

y=mx+(y_1-mx_1), b=y_1-mx_1

Step-by-step explanation:

The point slope form of the equation of a line is given as:

y-y_1=m(x-x_1)

The slope-intercept form of the equation of a line is given as:

y=mx+b

where: m=slope, b=y-intercept.

To convert from the point slope form to slope intercept form, follow these steps:

Step 1: Distribute the right hand side

y-y_1=m(x-x_1)\ny-y_1=mx-mx_1

Step 2: Isolate the y variable

y=mx-mx_1+y_1\ny=mx+(y_1-mx_1)

This is the slope-intercept form. We can evaluate y_1-mx_1 $ given values for $(x_1,y_1)$ and slope, m

-x + 3y = 3

x - 3y = 3

Does this system have a solution?

Answers

Answer:

No solution

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope-Intercept Form: y = mx + b

Step 1: Write out systems of equations

-x + 3y = 3

x - 3y = 3

Step 2: Rewrite equations into slope-intercept form

3y = 3 + x

y = 1 + x/3

-3y = 3 - x

y = -1 + x/3

Step 3: Rewrite systems of equations

y = x/3 + 1

y = x/3 - 1

Since we have the same slope for both equations but different y-intercepts, we know that both lines are parallel. If that is the case, they will never touch or intersect each other. Therefore, we have no solution.

A survey in Men’s Health magazine reported that 39% of cardiologists said that they took vitamin E supplements. To see if this is still true, a researcher randomly selected 100 cardiologists and found that 36 said that they took vitamin E supplements. At α = 0.05, test the claim that 39% of the cardiologists took vitamin E supplements. A recent study said that taking too much vitamin e might be harmful how might this study make the results of the previous study invalid?

Answers

Answer:

z=\frac{0.36 -0.39}{\sqrt{(0.39(1-0.39))/(100)}}=-0.615  

The p value for this case would be:

p_v =2*P(z<-0.615)=0.539  

For this case since the p value is higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion is not different from 0.39

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

n=100 represent the random sample taken

X=36 represent the number of people that take E supplement

\hat p=(36)/(100)=0.36 estimated proportion of people who take R supplement

p_o=0.39 is the value that we want to test

\alpha=0.05 represent the significance level

z would represent the statistic

p_v represent the p value

Hypothesis to test

We want to test if the true proportion is equatl to 0.39 or not, the system of hypothesis are.:  

Null hypothesis:p=0.39  

Alternative hypothesis:p \neq 0.39  

The statistic is given by:

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{(p_o (1-p_o))/(n)}} (1)  

Replacing the info we got:

z=\frac{0.36 -0.39}{\sqrt{(0.39(1-0.39))/(100)}}=-0.615  

The p value for this case would be:

p_v =2*P(z<-0.615)=0.539  

For this case since the p value is higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion is not different from 0.39

Which sequence is geometric?1, 5, 9, 13,
2. 6, 8, 10,
5, 7, 9, 11,
ОО
4. 3. 16. 32

Answers

4.3.16.32 is geometric