Answer:
i have to see the question more explain please.
Explanation:
Yes, this statement is true in this regard.
Explanation:
Article III of the United States constitution deals with the judicial power which explains that the whole judicial power is vested in the Supreme Court is the higher authority for the legal solutions. This article also express that the congress can establish the other inferior or lower level court from time to time.
Although the constitution creates Supreme Court but it gives power to the Congress to decide the functioning and organization of the Supreme Court. In the Judiciary Act of 1789, the congress used this power under this act the congress created a supreme court with 6 judges and also created a lower federal court.
Answer:
True
Article III (3)
Answer:
The justice system does not respond to most crime because so much crime is not discovered or reported to the police. Law enforcement agencies learn about crime from the reports of victims or other citizens, from discovery by a police officer in the field, from informants, or from investigative and intelligence work.
Explanation:
the right to employment
the rights of victims of crimes
the right to Internet access
the rights of children
Right to privacy and the rights of victims of crimes are some rights those are protected by the Washington declaration of rights.
Right is the power given to a person to own, possess, commit, acquire or hold somethings by virtue of some title. To every right there is equal duty of some other person to fulfil such right of the person.
Right to privacy as explained under section 7 of washing declaration of rights as, no person shall be disturbed in his private affair or has his home invaded without the authority of law. In layman language the right to privacy can be understood as a right of an individual to have his private affairs and secrecy to his business, that only he is entitled to disclose.
The rights of victims of crimes are those rights which are conferred upon the persons who has suffered the physical or emotional harm, property damage or economic loss as a result of some crime. The concept of the right of crimes has been discussed under section 35 of the Washington declaration of rights.
Article I of the Washington State Constitution is termed as the Washington declaration of rights. It is a formal declaration enumerating the rights of the citizen, which confers a range of rights to its citizen.
To know more about rights here,
#SPJ2
Answer:
I believe it is a, c and possibly e
Explanation:
Its not the other answer.
Answer:
You are considered positive
Explanation:
Answer:
I write this letter to talk to you about your nephew Jhonny and to emphasize the importance of having you as a support for his academic life.
As you may already know, Jhonny is a spectacular teenager who shows a strong talent for English and literature classes, although he has difficulties in other subjects, which is normal for most young people. We all believe that Jhonny has a bright future ahead of him, but unfortunately he has no resources of his own to move forward with his dreams, needing a lot of your support.
You more than I know that Jhonny cannot count on his parents to support his studies, since you are the closest and most important relative in this regard. Adult support is highly important for academic development and a promising future professional life.
I am sure that Jhonny is very grateful for everything you do for him and is very sad and shaken by the possibility of losing his support, but he has difficulties in telling you, which motivates me to write this letter.
I appreciate your understanding and hope that I have managed to change your opinion.
Kind regards,
Agatha Melly.
Explanation:
When a person dies without a will, their assets are distributed based on state intestacy laws. The state courts would handle a will contest in this scenario, and the court in the state where the deceased person resided would likely hear the case.
When a person dies without a will, it is referred to as dying intestate. In such cases, the court will distribute the assets based on state intestacy laws. Each state has its own set of laws that determine who will receive the property. In this scenario, where your uncle's ex-wife claims to have a valid will, it would be up to the state courts to handle the case.
State courts have jurisdiction over probate matters, including will contests. They have the authority to determine the validity of the will and decide how the estate should be distributed. The court in the state where your uncle resided at the time of his death would be the most likely to hear the case.
#SPJ12
A. An elderly woman who had been arrested for fraudulently writing checks on a closed bank account had initially asserted her right to remain silent, but she later blurted out that she’d been part of a criminal enterprise after two detectives indicated she would be facing life in prison unless she confessed immediately.
B. The primary suspect in a hit-and-run collision was asked by investigators to prove she wasn’t at the scene of the accident or face being charged with obstruction of justice. When threatened, she replied, “Okay, I was there at that time, but I don’t think I hit anything.”
C. Two teenagers arrested for breaking into a house for sale confirmed that they had walked by the house several times and were curious about what had been left inside after the owners moved away, but they had never satisfied their curiosity.
D. A suspect in an auto theft said that he had had always feared being accused of stealing a car after a detective told him he looked like a car thief.
Answer:
B C & D
Explanation:
All of the suspects told the officers evidence that pointed mostly at them for the culprit but didn't confess
Answer:
A- The primary suspect in a hit-and-run collision was asked by investigators to prove she wasn’t at the scene of the accident or face being charged with obstruction of justice. When threatened, she replied, “Okay, I was there at that time, but I don’t think I hit anything.”
D- An elderly woman who had been arrested for fraudulently writing checks on a closed bank account had initially asserted her right to remain silent, but she later blurted out that she’d been part of a criminal enterprise after two detectives indicated she would be facing life in prison unless she confessed immediately.