Roxanne wants to save up enough money so that she can buy a video game. The game costs $59. Roxanne has $22 saved from mowing the grass. In order to make more money, she plans to pressure wash her neighbors’ driveways. She plans to charge $5 for each driveway she pressure washes, and any extra money she makes beyond $59 she will save to buy another video game. How many driveways does she need to pressure wash to reach her goal?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: Roxanna will have to wash 8 driveways giving her a total of $62 to go towards her new video game. She’ll have $3 left over.

Related Questions

Work out the highest common factor (HCF) of 8 and 20.​
QuestionComplete the hypothesis about the product of two rational numbers.Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.The product of two rational numbers is a rationalequivalent to the ratio of two integersnumbernumber because multiplying two rational numbers is3 which is an irrational
Please helpWith this question for algebra
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST ONLY HAVE 30 MINUTES
An experiment is pulling a ball from an urn that contains 3 blue balls and 5 red balls. a.) Find the probability of getting a red ball. b.) Find the probability of getting a blue ball. c.) Find the odds for getting a red ball. d.) Find the odds for getting a blue ball.

A cable that weighs 6 lb/ft is used to lift 500 lb of coal up a mine shaft 400 ft deep. Find the work done. Show how to approximate the required work by a Riemann sum. (Let x be the distance in feet below the top of the shaft. Enter xi* as xi.)

Answers

The work done to lift the coal is 6.8*10^5 ft-lb

Data;

  • weight of cable = 6lb/ft
  • weight of coal = 500lb
  • length of mine shaft = 400ft

Let the distance (ft) below top of the shaft be represented by x

The weight of the coal  to be lifted from mine = 500lb

Work Done

The work done to lift the coal is

work = force * displacement\nw=fx\nforce f(x) = 500 + 6x\nw_i= f(x_i)=[500+6x_i]\delta x\n

Taking the summation limit

w =  \lim_(0 \to 400) \sum [500+6x_i]\delta x\n \delta w = f(x) \delta x\n

we can take the integration of both sides where x will the range from 0 to 400.

\int \delta w = \int f(x) dx\n\int\limits^(400)_0{(500+6x)} \, dx \nw=[500x+3x^2]_0^4^0^0\nw=500(400-0)+ 3(400^2-0^2)\nw= 680000\nw=6.8*10^5 ft-lb

From the calculations above, the work done is 6.8*10^5 ft-lb

Learn more on work done on a lift here;

brainly.com/question/10247507

brainly.com/question/7203062

Answer:

8.2 *10^5 ft lb

Step-by-step explanation:

Wcoal = 800*500  = 400000 = 4*10^5 ft lb

Wrope =\int\limits^(400)_0 {6(400-y)} \, dy

Using a right Riemann sum

The width of the entireregion to be estimated = 400 - 0 = 400

Considering 8 equal subdivisions, then the width of each rectangular division is 400/8 = 50

F(x) = 6(400-y)

\left[\begin{array}{cccccccccc}x&0&50&100&150&200&250&300&350 &400\nf(x)&2400&2100&1800&1500&1200&900&600&300&0\end{array}\right]

Wrope = 50(2100) + 50(1800) + 50(1500) + 50(1200) + 50(900) + 50(600)

+ 50(300) + 50(0) = 420000 = 4.2 * 10^5 ft lb

Note: Riemann sum is an approximation, so may not give a accurate value

work done =  Wcoal + Wrope= 4*10^5+ 4.2 * 10^5 = 8.2 *10^5 ft lb

Consider a random sample of ten children selected from a population of infants receiving antacids that contain aluminum, in order to treat peptic or digestive disorders. The distribution of plasma aluminum levels is known to be approximately normal; however its mean u and standard deviation o are not known. The mean aluminum level for the sample of n = 10 infants is found to be X = 37.20 ug/l and the sample standard deviation is s = 7.13 ug/1. Furthermore, the mean plasma aluminum level for the population of infants not receiving antacids is known to be only 4.13 ug/1.(a) Formulate the null hypothesis and complementary alternative hypothesis, for a two-sided test of whether the mean plasma aluminum level of the population of infants receiving antacids is equal to the mean plasma aluminum level of the population of infants not receiving antacids.(b) Construct a 95% confidence interval for the true mean plasma aluminum level of the population of infants receiving antacids.(c) Calculate the p-value of this sample (as best as possible), at the a=.05 significance level.(d) Based on your answers in parts (b) and (c), is the null hypothesis rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis, at the a = .05 significance level? Interpret your conclusion: What exactly has been demonstrated, based on the empirical evidence?(e) With the knowledge that significantly elevated plasma aluminum levels are toxic to human beings, reformulate the null hypothesis and complementary alternative hypothesis, for the appropriate one-sided test of the mean plasma aluminum levels. With the same sample data as above, how does the new p-value compare with that found in part (c), and what is the resulting conclusion and interpretation?

Answers

Answer:

a. Null hypothesis: The mean plasma aluminum level of the population of infants receiving antacids is equal to the mean plasma aluminum level of the population of infants not receiving antacids.

Complementary alternative hypothesis: The mean plasma aluminum level of the population of infants receiving antacids is different from the mean plasma aluminum level of the population of infants not receiving antacids.

b. (32.1, 42.3)

c. p-value < .00001

d. The null hypothesis is rejected at the α=0.05 significance level

e. Reformulated null hypothesis: The mean plasma aluminum level of the population of infants receiving antacids is equal to the mean plasma aluminum level of the population of infants not receiving antacids.

Reformulated complementary alternative hypothesis: The mean plasma aluminum level of the population of infants receiving antacids is higher than the mean plasma aluminum level of the population of infants not receiving antacids.

p-value equals < .00001. The null hypothesis is rejected at the α=0.05 significance level. This suggests that being given antacidsgreatly increases the plasma aluminum levels of children.

Step-by-step explanation:

a. Null hypothesis: The mean plasma aluminum level of the population of infants receiving antacids is equal to the mean plasma aluminum level of the population of infants not receiving antacids.

Complementary alternative hypothesis: The mean plasma aluminum level of the population of infants receiving antacids is different from the mean plasma aluminum level of the population of infants not receiving antacids. This may imply that being given antacids significantly changes the plasma aluminum level of infants.

b. Since the population standard deviation σ is unknown, we must use the t distribution to find 95% confidence limits for μ. For a t distribution with 10-1=9 degrees of freedom, 95% of the observations lie between -2.262 and 2.262. Therefore, replacing σ with s, a 95% confidence interval for the population mean μ is:

(X bar - 2.262\frac{s}{\sqrt{10} } , X bar + 2.262\frac{s}{\sqrt{10} })

Substituting in the values of X bar and s, the interval becomes:

(37.2 - 2.262\frac{7.13}{\sqrt{10} } , 37.2 + 2.262\frac{7.13}{\sqrt{10} })

or (32.1, 42.3)

c. To calculate p-value of the sample , we need to calculate the t-statistics which equals:

t=\frac{(Xbar-u)}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{10} } } = \frac{(37.2-4.13)}{\frac{7.13}{\sqrt{10} } } = 14.67.

Given two-sided test and degrees of freedom = 9, the p-value equals < .00001, which is less than 0.05.

d. The mean plasma aluminum level for the population of infants not receiving antacids is 4.13 ug/l - not a plausible value of mean plasma aluminum level for the population of infants receiving antacids. The 95% confidence interval for the population mean of infants receiving antacids is (32.1, 42.3) and does not cover the value 4.13. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected at the α=0.05 significance level. This suggests that being given antacids greatly changes the plasma aluminum levels of children.

e. Reformulated null hypothesis: The mean plasma aluminum level of the population of infants receiving antacids is equal to the mean plasma aluminum level of the population of infants not receiving antacids.

Reformulated complementary alternative hypothesis: The mean plasma aluminum level of the population of infants receiving antacids is higher than the mean plasma aluminum level of the population of infants not receiving antacids.

Given one-sided test and degree of freedom = 9, the p-value equals < .00001, which is less than 0.05. This result is similar to result in part (c). the null hypothesis is rejected at the α=0.05 significance level. This suggests that being given antacids greatly increases the plasma aluminum levels of children.

Justine already owns 90 hair bands, and additional hair bands are priced at 5 for a dollar. With $124 to spend on new hair bands, how many total hair bands can Justine own? Write and solve an equation to find the answer.

Answers

Answer:

710 hairbands

Step-by-step explanation:

Total hairbands = (5*dollars spent) + 90

Max hairbands = (5 * 124) + 90

Find two numbers whose sum is 30, and whose difference is 26

Answers

x + y = 30
x - y = 26
--------------add
2x = 56
x = 56/2
x = 28

x + y = 30
28 + y = 30
y = 30 - 28
y = 2

ur 2 numbers are : 28 and 2

Find the length of side
x in simplest radical form with a rational denominator.

Answers

The length of sides x in the simplest radical form is 2√2

Properties of a right angled triangle:

  • One of the angle is equals to 90 degree.
  • The sides can be found using Pythagoras theorem
  • Trigonometric ratios can be used to find the angles.

Let's find x using trigonometric ratios

sin ∅ = opposite / hypotenuse

Therefore,

sin 30° = √2 / x

x sin 30° = √2

x = √2 / sin 30°

x = (√(2) )/((1)/(2) )

x = √(2) × 2

x = 2√2

learn more on right angle triangle: brainly.com/question/15948053?referrer=searchResults

1/ 7     what is the probability that the state will not be hit by a major tornado in the next ten​ years?

Answers

Final answer:

Probability of not witnessing a major tornado hit over the next ten years would be derived from historical data based on frequency of such events. Probability is a measure of uncertainty and these estimates can change as more information becomes available. Actual probability calculations can involve complex concepts such as Poisson distributions and conditional probabilities.

Explanation:

The question asks for the probability of not witnessing a major tornado hit over the next ten years. Probability in this context would typically be derived from historical data on frequency of such events. The data provided seems unrelated, so I'll provide a hypothetical example instead. If historical data shows that the state gets hit by a major tornado every 20 years on average, you could argue there's a 50% chance (1 out of 2 decades) that the state will not be hit by a major tornado in the next ten years.

However, keep in mind that probability is a measure of uncertainty, not certainty. Probabilities are estimates based on what we currently know and can change as more information becomes available. For example, if climate change leads to more severe weather events, the chance of a tornado might increase.

This is a simplified model and actual probability calculations can be much more complex, involving things like Poisson distributions and conditional probabilities which are often used in analyses of rare events such as natural disasters.

Learn more about Probability here:

brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ12