Answer:
The mercantilist nations believed that the more gold and silver they acquired, the more wealth they possessed. Smith believed that this economic policy was foolish and actually limited the potential for "real wealth," which he defined as "the annual produce of the land and labor of the society."
Explanation:
i dont know if you still need this but uh there ya go lol
The debate over counting the slave population in the United States resulted in the Three-Fifths Compromise, which counted enslaved individuals as three-fifths of a person for representation and taxation. This arrangement caused an imbalance of power in favor of the slave-holding states and led to controversy around congressional reapportionment. This situation changed following the abolition of slavery, when formerly enslaved individuals were fully counted towards their state's populations.
The issue of counting the slave population arose during the birth of the United States. It was centered around the question of whether or not to count enslaved individuals as part of a state's total population for both representation and taxation purposes.
This debate resulted in the Three-Fifths Compromise in the 1787 Constitution, agreeing to count enslaved people as three-fifths of a person for congressional representation and taxation. This was a controversial compromise because it effectively gave additional political power to the slave-holding states.
As part of this compromise, Three-Fifths of the enslaved population would be counted when determining a state's population for taxation and representation. The north and south continued to disagree on whether the 'extra' population of enslaved people should be counted, resulting in an imbalance of power in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College. Despite the abolition of slavery, the effects of this arrangement persisted into the 1920s, creating controversy around the process of congressional reapportionment.
Last but not least, it's important to highlight the change in the political landscape following the abolition of slavery. Once slavery was abolished, the states that once benefited from the three-fifths counting rule now faced a challenging situation. These states had population increases with the formerly enslaved individuals being counted fully towards their respective states' total population.
#SPJ12
O Funding for public schools has increased.
o Performance of minority groups has
increased.
o Schools have become less segregated,
DONE
Answer:
Performance of minority groups has increased
Explanation:
NCLB stands for No Child Left Behind. It was a program created by the Congress to help disadvantaged students get through their school.
This act mostly aimed for minority groups students. The reason being, minority students often came from lower income family. This tend to be associated with lesser attention from the parents, lack of proper nutrition, and social discrimination that they have to pass everyday. All of these contribute to their lower grade.
Ever since the NCLB was enacted, performance of students from minority groups has increased. This also reflected in their increasing average salary as they entered the job market.
Answer:
Explanation:
The correct answer is the following.
The factors that caused Europeans to seek new trade routes to Asia were that the Ottoman Turks blocked the trade route to the city of Constantinople in 1453. This happened because the Ottoman Army had captured that part of Constantinople that was located in the famous Silk Road between Europe and Asia. Then, European traders began to look for new routes that could take them and their products to the East. The closure of the road by the Ottomans to boycott trade also serve as the beginning of the Age of Discovery, when explorers navigated the sea in order to find new routes for its products.
The SIlk road was a series of roads that were established for trade and transportation purposes during the Chinese Han Dynasty. The Silk Road was the main road that united the West and the East form 130 BCE to 1453 CE.
beliefs are most like their own.
B. The media are for-profit businesses, unable to be fair or objective in the interest of the public.
C. Candidates already in office receive more media attention than those who are trying to take their
positions.
D. People always vote for the person the media determine is most qualified, rather than the candidate
who can bring about change.
Answer:
B. The media are for-profit businesses, unable to be fair or objective in the interest of the public.
Explanation:
The media's objective is to sway the public into believing what they say, and to essentially (though the term may be harsh) brainwash the viewer to see the situation as the media see's it, instead of allowing them to have their own objective view. Of course, it does not work 100% like this, but the way the media portrays events can definitely affect the view of a person.
For example, in recent events, President Trump proposed a tax deduction to help small businesses and the ordinary person to survive through the wake of the Corona-virus and the stay-at-home order. However, while it may seem like a good thing, the media sways the public's opinion to believe that the tax cuts were only beneficial to the wealthy. This sways people's beliefs of whether the tax cut was beneficial as a whole or not, but Trump did a tax cut, which is all that matters.
Another example can be found in a not-as-recent event, where President Obama signed tax cuts into law. Most media coverage of it was neutral at most, even positive sometimes. This shows that there is bias inside the media, and those who read, listen to, or watch certain media would be accustom to their way of thinking as well.
Remember, all media is there to make a profit, and to do so, they must 1) have large amounts of viewers, and 2) be able to influence others into seeing events the way they see it. There is no objective views in the media, for everybody has their own opinions, and own set of beliefs.